Search Strategy - II Dr. V. V. Subrahmanyam Associate Professor, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

search strategy ii
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Search Strategy - II Dr. V. V. Subrahmanyam Associate Professor, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Search Strategy - II Dr. V. V. Subrahmanyam Associate Professor, SOCIS, IGNOU Mismatch Between Information Need and Search Results Problems of online searching identified by Fenichels study (1980-81) are: Approaches to searching


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Search Strategy - II

  • Dr. V. V. Subrahmanyam

Associate Professor, SOCIS, IGNOU

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mismatch Between Information Need and Search Results

  • Problems of online searching identified by

Fenichel’s study (1980-81) are:

– Approaches to searching vary from user to user – Major problems are with the search strategy and not with the mechanics of the retrieval system – Most of the users do not make full use of online interactive facilities – Lack of skills, charging policy, search environment and nature of question

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Major causes for deviation

(Guinchat and Menou, 1990, p.314)

  • Information need as perceived by end-user
  • Information need as expressed in end-user’s

query

  • Information need as interpreted by

Information Specialist

  • Query formulation in the language of the

system

  • Formulation of search expression and strategy
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Contd…

  • Search and retrieval operations
  • Intermediate results
  • Final results
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Major Approaches in Searching

(Markey and Atherton, 1981; Harter, 1986, Hartley 1990)

  • Briefsearch
  • Block-building method
  • Successive fractions method
  • Citation Pearl Growing method
  • Starting a search with the most discriminating

facet first

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Contd…

  • Starting the search with the lowest posted or

the most specific term as measured against the file

  • A combination of two or more of the above

methods which is useful in actual practice of searching.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Briefsearch

  • It is a quick and relatively less expensive way
  • f getting a rough idea about what a database

holds about a subject.

  • With the help of many more additional terms

derived from the first briefsearch further search steps can be proceeded.

  • One may not adopt this technique for a full

fledged search.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Building Block Method

  • Reduce a request into a series of sub-

problems.

  • This strategy is logical in construction of

search mechanism but takes time in keying-in and requires knowledge of the appropriate vocabulary.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Example

  • Software packages for information retrieval

– S1 software OR packages OR software packages – S2 information retrieval – S3 S1 AND S2 *OR and then AND

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Successive Fractions Strategy

  • This approach is a way of reducing a large set

created using AND or NOT

  • Example:
  • Swimming and physical fitness of women

– S1 swimming AND (wom?n OR female?) – S2 S1 AND fit? – S3 S2 AND year >= 1995

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Citation Pearl Growing Method

  • It begins with a very small initial set, even a

single term known to be relevant to the query.

  • The resultant retrieval provides additional

relevant terms.

  • These can be used to carry out further

searches on the subject.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Precision Devices

  • Precision devices are used to restrict the no.
  • f records retrieved.
  • Such devices enable the coordination of

linking information at various stages of document indexing, search, and retrieval processes.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recall devices

  • Recall devices are used to increase the no. of

relevant references retrieved by a search expression.

  • The devices includes synonym control,

hierarchical term linkage, associative term linkage, control of work forms, summation of document sets and bibliographic coupling.