search for new physics search for new physics with b
play

Search for New Physics Search for New Physics with B-Mesons with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Search for New Physics Search for New Physics with B-Mesons with B-Mesons Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee 1 Stefan Spanier Energy budget of Universe Dark Energy: ~70% Dark Matter: ~25% ~25% Antimatter: 0% ~70% 2


  1. Search for New Physics Search for New Physics with B-Mesons with B-Mesons Stefan Spanier University of Tennessee 1 Stefan Spanier

  2. • Energy budget of Universe Dark Energy: ~70% Dark Matter: ~25% ~25% Antimatter: 0% ~70% 2 Stefan Spanier

  3. • Understanding the Small = Understanding the Big ? matter In Big-Bang Cosmology Universe  initially contained equal amounts anti-matter  of matter, anti-matter and photons photons Most particles & anti-particles annihilated each other while the   Universe was still very dense to  form photons. Today’s (visible) Universe has a lot of cosmic micro- wave photons and a tiny bit of matter:  One baryon per  10 9 microwave photons. Only one anti-particle per 10 9 particles. T< 3K Sometime a process distinguishing particles from anti-particles was at work… 3 Stefan Spanier

  4. • Baryogenesis 3 fundamental conditions to construct a baryon asymmerty A. Sakharov Toy Model of Baryogenesis _ Rate r _ q q,l Condition II : r  r CP Violation _ _ Condition I q q,l _ Rate r _ B anti-symmetric q q q _ _ q q q _ freeze out q q _ q q q _ q q q Condition III B symmetric Non-equilibrium Standard Model provides the ingredients ! 4 Disclaimer: There are many realizations, but all need CP violation. Stefan Spanier

  5. • Standard Model - CP Symmetry C : charge conjugation (particle – antiparticle) -x P : parity P x = -x , P( x  v ) = ( x  v ) x For decay of particle X into final state f: _ _ CP ( X  f ) = X  f • A difference between decay rates of a particle and its Anti-particle implies CP violation.  CP violation can be ingredient to explain ratio of matter to anti-matter. - C and P maximally violated in the Standard Model - 1964 CP violation observed in neutral kaon decays ! 5 Stefan Spanier

  6. 10 -35 s 10 28 K Grand Unification Transition It may have happened 10 -10 s 10 15 K Electroweak Era (100 GeV) 10 -6 s 10 13 K Quark-Hadron transition here ! But … (1 GeV) 10 9 K Nucleosynthesis 1 min light elements created SM Higgs is heavy (125 GeV [LHC]) 1 Byr 20 K Galaxies form  no departure from thermal equilibrium 14 Byr 3 K Today CP violation in the Standard Model is 10 orders of magnitude too small ! Something else has happened ! B-factory can reach > 10 16 K … ~ 6 Stefan Spanier

  7. • Standard Model of Particle Physics particles anti-particles _ _ _ Charge Charge u c t d s b + 2/3 + 1/3 Quarks _ _ _ - 1/3 - 2/3 d s b u c t B=1/3 B=-1/3 C Baryon number e -     _ _ _  e     -1 0 Leptons e +      e     0 +1 L=1 L=-1 Lepton number Standard Model mass _ C: Charge conjugation symmetry p : anti-proton _ u _ _ C p = p d _ u In today’s accelerators (cosmic rays) particles and anti-particles are created and annihilate in pairs ! 7 Stefan Spanier

  8. • CP Violation in the Standard Model W b c,u u c t CKM matrix - parametrize transitions with  d 3 strengths and one complex phase  s  b ~ 1     ,  (  ) the phase is accessible   arg( ) with B mesons ! t d _  b d arg( ) u b   DK, K  … J/  K 0 ,  K 0 , D*D* … (0,0) (1,0) CP magnitude ~ triangle area) Branching Fractions < 10 -4 / 8 Stefan Spanier

  9. • CP Violation Phenomenology Quantum Mechanics 101 To observe CP-violation (phase) a particle decay needs to depend on at least two complex amplitudes A 1 and A 2 decay rate  amplitude 2 • Only one amplitude: |A 1 | 2 = |a 1 e i  1 | 2 = |a 1 | 2  rate not sensitive to phase • Two amplitudes: |A 1 + A 2 | 2 = |a 1 e i  1 + a 2 e i  2 | 2 2 + a 2 2 + 2 a 1 a 2 cos(  1 –  2 ) = a 1  rate depends on phase 9 Stefan Spanier

  10. • Relevant Amplitudes in B-Meson Decays Tree amplitude Penguin Amplitude e.g. B 0  J/  K 0 e.g. B 0   K 0 S S _ W _ _ _ _ b c t J/   b s c s B 0 W gluon B 0 _ _ _ s s K 0 K 0 d d S d d S weak coupling * * ~V cb V cs ~V tb V ts • Penguins allow for Physics Beyond ~ _ _ g s  s b b s the Standard Model ! b d ( δ 23 RR ) ~ + η ’ b • Different Penguins in different ways R s s ~ g s 0 s B _ R e.g. additional Phase from s s s Supersymmetry ? Ks K 0 d d d S d d d Study Penguins !!! new coupling 10 Stefan Spanier

  11. • Direct CP Violation _ _ Rate(B 0  f )  Rate(B 0  f ) •CP violation  hadronic time    i i A a e e i i i i  : weak phases  : strong phases i i Rate difference:          R R - 2 a i a sin( ) sin( ) j i j i j i , j Short range, long range (rescattering) hadronic interactions need to be understood ! New Physics can change the expected rates. 11 Stefan Spanier

  12. _ • Direct CP Violation in B 0  K +  - (B 0  K -  + )  From 454 million neutral B decays reconstruct 1606 signals. Challenge: distinguish K +  - from  +  - and K + K - which are also present.     - 0 N K-  + N K+  - B K B A B AR      0 Asymmetry B K N K-  + N K+  - + = -0.133  0.030 stat  0.009 syst 4.2  [ Phys.Rev.Lett. 93 (2004) 131801]  Significant asymmetry (13%) is 100,000 stronger than the one measured in neutral kaon decays.  Bang on Standard Model expectation 12 Stefan Spanier

  13. _ • B 0 B 0 Oscillation Measurement _ B 0 , B 0 can oscillate (mix) into each other  one more amplitude  e W - e - t c b d _ D - W W 0 0 B d B d Box amplitude: - - - - t c d b * ~ V tb V td W + e + Characteristic decay products tag the B 0 flavor:  e unmix – mix A mix (  t) = unmix + mix N(e + e - ) – N(e - e - /e + e + ) = N(e + e - ) + N(e - e - /e + e + ) D  D cos (  m d  t)   (  t) 6.3 ps 12.6 ps  m d = 0.493  0.012 stat  0.009 sys ps -1 13 Stefan Spanier

  14. • CP Violation in Interference between Mixing and Decay Observe as an asymmetry between transitions of particle % anti-particle. The cleanest way is via a decay of B 0 into a CP eigenstate: flavor tag _ Quantum B 0 entangled S /  K 0 J/  K 0 B 0 S e + e -  Y(4S) (golden modes) _ B 0 time mixing  contains CP phase) sin2  = 0 : no CP violation S and  K 0 sin2   0.7 : expected in Standard Model for J/  K 0 S with 4% theoretical uncertainty in SM, only. 14 Stefan Spanier

  15. • CP Violation in Interference between Mixing and Decay Observe as an asymmetry between transitions of particle % anti-particle. The cleanest way is via a decay of B 0 into a CP eigenstate:  flavor tag _ Quantum B 0 entangled B 0 e + e -  Y(4S)  K 0 _ S B 0 time mixing + direct CP violation 15 Stefan Spanier

  16. • B Meson Production Use Electron-Positron collider _ – Y(4S) resonance decays nearly 100% into B-meson pairs (B + B - ,B 0 B 0 ) – Accelerator can be tuned in; production just above threshold  – Clean environment _ – Coherent B 0 B 0 production b e + d  L = 1 e - [CLEO] - d e +  hadrons b e - Y(4s) uu,dd,ss ~ 2.1 nb d ~ 30  m cc ~ 1.3 nb bb ~ 1.05 nb PEP-II B A B AR Off On (energy) mass(B) = 5.28 GeV/c 2  E M ( MeV )  CM ( 4 S ) 16 Stefan Spanier

  17. • Asymmetry Measurement with BaBar   , e  , K  LEP/CDF Flavor tag Partial reconstruction perfect B  time e + 3 GeV resolution   e - : 9 GeV K S B    resolution function J/   e   z L     B Decay Time (ps) Full reconstruction B Factories e      perfect time resolution Lorentz Boost  =0.56  z> = <  t>  c ~ 250  m .. instead of ~ 30  m in CM  B Decay Time Difference (ps) 17 Stefan Spanier

  18. 330 M BB pairs Run5 BaBar integral luminosity fb -1 Run4 1650 mA e - 2500 mA e + 4 ns bunch spacing Run3 ~ 8 BB pairs / s Run2 Run1 Y(4s) - 40 MeV 18 2000 2006 Stefan Spanier

  19. • BaBar Collaboration • 10 countries • 63 institutions • ~550 physicists 19 Stefan Spanier

  20. • BaBar Detector Silicon Vertex Tracker 5 layers of double sided Si strips DIRC 144 synthetic fused silica bars 11000 PMTs e + Drift Chamber 40 axial stereo layers e - 1.5T Solenoid Electromagnetic Calorimeter Instrumented Flux Return 6580 CsI(Tl) crystals 19 layers of RPCs Limited Streamer tubes in upper/lower barrel sextant 20 Stefan Spanier

  21. • The Cherenkov Detector   , e  , K  B  (~80%) cos  C (  ) =      v/c  n(  ) identify particle also by measuring the identify particle by measuring  C , number of photons N with momentum p is known from tracking: N  L sin 2  C L = pathlength in medium Number of photons Cherenkov angle [rad] in quartz for certain d track momentum [GeV/c] track momentum [GeV/c] 21 Stefan Spanier

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend