Saving Teens: Using a Policy Discontinuity to Estimate the Effects of Medicaid Eligibility
Laura Wherry1 Bruce Meyer2
1UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine 2University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy
Saving Teens: Using a Policy Discontinuity to Estimate the Effects - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Saving Teens: Using a Policy Discontinuity to Estimate the Effects of Medicaid Eligibility Laura Wherry 1 Bruce Meyer 2 1 UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine 2 University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy AcademyHealth ARM June 26, 2017
1UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine 2University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
2 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
3 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
4 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
5 / 16
Average Years of Childhood Eligibility 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Oct−79 Jan−80 Apr−80 Jul−80 Oct−80 Jan−81 Apr−81 Jul−81 Oct−81 Jan−82 Apr−82 Jul−82 Oct−82 Jan−83 Apr−83 Jul−83 Oct−83 Jan−84 Apr−84 Jul−84 Oct−84 Jan−85 Apr−85 Jul−85 Oct−85 Jan−86 Apr−86 Jul−86 Oct−86 Jan−87 Apr−87 Jul−87 0−24% FPL 25−49% FPL 50−74% FPL 75−99% FPL 100−124% FPL 0.22 years 2.01 years 3.44 years 4.57 years 0.43 years Size of discontinuity = 0.19 years of eligibility 125−150% FPL Birth Cohort
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Age in Years Share of Birth Cohort Eligible for Public Health Insurance 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Ages 4−7 Ages 8−14 Ages 15−18
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
8 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
9 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
10 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Black, Ages 8−14
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Black, Ages 15−18
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
Black, Ages 19−23
∗∗∗p < 0.01,∗∗ p < 0.05,∗ p < 0.1 11 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3
White, Ages 8−14
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
White, Ages 15−18
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2
White, Ages 19−23
∗∗∗p < 0.01,∗∗ p < 0.05,∗ p < 0.1 12 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Black, Ages 8−14
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 4 5 6 7 8
Black, Ages 15−18
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 9 10 11 12 13
Black, Ages 19−23
∗∗∗p < 0.01,∗∗ p < 0.05,∗ p < 0.1 13 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
White, Ages 8−14
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0
White, Ages 15−18
Jun−80 Feb−82 Oct−83 Jun−85 Feb−87 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5
White, Ages 19−23
∗∗∗p < 0.01,∗∗ p < 0.05,∗ p < 0.1 14 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
White External Mortality, Ages 8−14
β ^ at September 30, 1983 = 0.075 Frequency 5 10 15 20 25 30 −0.15 −0.1 −0.05 0.05 0.1 0.15
Black Internal Mortality, Ages 15−18
β ^ at September 30, 1983 = −0.441 Frequency 5 10 15 20 25 30 −0.4 −0.2 0.2 0.4
15 / 16
Introduction Policy Discontinuity Data and Methods Results Conclusions
16 / 16