sato tate groups of higher weight motives

play

Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives Kiran S. Kedlaya - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May 31, 2023 •474 likes •1.47k views

Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives Kiran S. Kedlaya Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego (visiting ICERM) kedlaya@ucsd.edu http://kskedlaya.org/slides/ Explicit Methods for Modularity of K3 Surfaces and Other

Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives Kiran S. Kedlaya Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego (visiting ICERM) kedlaya@ucsd.edu http://kskedlaya.org/slides/ Explicit Methods for Modularity of K3 Surfaces and Other Higher Weight Motives Institute for Computational and Experimental Research in Mathematics Providence, October 19–23, 2015 Supported by NSF (grant DMS-1501214), UCSD (Warschawski chair), Guggenheim Foundation (fellowship). Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 1 / 31
Contents Overview 1 Construction of the Sato-Tate group [S, BK1, BK2] 2 Example in weight 1: abelian varieties [FKRS] 3 Example in weight 2: K3 surfaces [?] 4 Example in weight 3: hypergeometric motives [FKS] 5 References 6 Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 2 / 31
Overview Contents Overview 1 Construction of the Sato-Tate group [S, BK1, BK2] 2 Example in weight 1: abelian varieties [FKRS] 3 Example in weight 2: K3 surfaces [?] 4 Example in weight 3: hypergeometric motives [FKS] 5 References 6 Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 3 / 31
Overview Motivation: equidistribution for L -functions For a motive M (with Q -coefficients), consider its L -function in the analytic normalization: � � F p ( p − s ) − 1 , L ( s ) = L p ( s ) = F p ( T ) = 1 − a p T + · · · . p p Conjecture (generalized Sato-Tate conjecture; Serre, 1994) The polynomials F p ( T ) are equidistributed for the image of Haar measure (via the characteristic polynomial map) on a specified compact Lie group ST( M ) (the Sato-Tate group ). E.g,, the a p vary like traces of random matrices in ST( M ). Proposition For any given degree, weight, and Hodge numbers (i.e., Gamma factors), there are only finitely many possible Sato-Tate groups. Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 4 / 31
Overview Motivation: equidistribution for L -functions For a motive M (with Q -coefficients), consider its L -function in the analytic normalization: � � F p ( p − s ) − 1 , L ( s ) = L p ( s ) = F p ( T ) = 1 − a p T + · · · . p p Conjecture (generalized Sato-Tate conjecture; Serre, 1994) The polynomials F p ( T ) are equidistributed for the image of Haar measure (via the characteristic polynomial map) on a specified compact Lie group ST( M ) (the Sato-Tate group ). E.g,, the a p vary like traces of random matrices in ST( M ). Proposition For any given degree, weight, and Hodge numbers (i.e., Gamma factors), there are only finitely many possible Sato-Tate groups. Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 4 / 31
Overview Motivation: equidistribution for L -functions For a motive M (with Q -coefficients), consider its L -function in the analytic normalization: � � F p ( p − s ) − 1 , L ( s ) = L p ( s ) = F p ( T ) = 1 − a p T + · · · . p p Conjecture (generalized Sato-Tate conjecture; Serre, 1994) The polynomials F p ( T ) are equidistributed for the image of Haar measure (via the characteristic polynomial map) on a specified compact Lie group ST( M ) (the Sato-Tate group ). E.g,, the a p vary like traces of random matrices in ST( M ). Proposition For any given degree, weight, and Hodge numbers (i.e., Gamma factors), there are only finitely many possible Sato-Tate groups. Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 4 / 31
Overview Motivation: equidistribution for L -functions For a motive M (with Q -coefficients), consider its L -function in the analytic normalization: � � F p ( p − s ) − 1 , L ( s ) = L p ( s ) = F p ( T ) = 1 − a p T + · · · . p p Conjecture (generalized Sato-Tate conjecture; Serre, 1994) The polynomials F p ( T ) are equidistributed for the image of Haar measure (via the characteristic polynomial map) on a specified compact Lie group ST( M ) (the Sato-Tate group ). E.g,, the a p vary like traces of random matrices in ST( M ). Proposition For any given degree, weight, and Hodge numbers (i.e., Gamma factors), there are only finitely many possible Sato-Tate groups. Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 4 / 31
Overview Example: elliptic curves Take M = H 1 ( E ) with E an elliptic curve over Q . If E has CM, then ST( M ) is the normalizer of SO(2 , R ) in SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D2_a1f.gif . Equidistribution follows easily from CM theory (Hecke). If E has no CM, then ST( M ) = SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D1_a1f.gif Equidistribution (i.e., the original Sato-Tate conjecture) is known but hard: it uses potential modularity of symmetric power L -functions (Taylor et al.). If we consider E over a number field K , then the CM picture changes if the CM field is contained in K , as ST( M ) decreases to SO(2 , R ): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D3_a1f.gif . Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 5 / 31
Overview Example: elliptic curves Take M = H 1 ( E ) with E an elliptic curve over Q . If E has CM, then ST( M ) is the normalizer of SO(2 , R ) in SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D2_a1f.gif . Equidistribution follows easily from CM theory (Hecke). If E has no CM, then ST( M ) = SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D1_a1f.gif Equidistribution (i.e., the original Sato-Tate conjecture) is known but hard: it uses potential modularity of symmetric power L -functions (Taylor et al.). If we consider E over a number field K , then the CM picture changes if the CM field is contained in K , as ST( M ) decreases to SO(2 , R ): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D3_a1f.gif . Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 5 / 31
Overview Example: elliptic curves Take M = H 1 ( E ) with E an elliptic curve over Q . If E has CM, then ST( M ) is the normalizer of SO(2 , R ) in SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D2_a1f.gif . Equidistribution follows easily from CM theory (Hecke). If E has no CM, then ST( M ) = SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D1_a1f.gif Equidistribution (i.e., the original Sato-Tate conjecture) is known but hard: it uses potential modularity of symmetric power L -functions (Taylor et al.). If we consider E over a number field K , then the CM picture changes if the CM field is contained in K , as ST( M ) decreases to SO(2 , R ): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D3_a1f.gif . Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 5 / 31
Overview Example: elliptic curves Take M = H 1 ( E ) with E an elliptic curve over Q . If E has CM, then ST( M ) is the normalizer of SO(2 , R ) in SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D2_a1f.gif . Equidistribution follows easily from CM theory (Hecke). If E has no CM, then ST( M ) = SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D1_a1f.gif Equidistribution (i.e., the original Sato-Tate conjecture) is known but hard: it uses potential modularity of symmetric power L -functions (Taylor et al.). If we consider E over a number field K , then the CM picture changes if the CM field is contained in K , as ST( M ) decreases to SO(2 , R ): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D3_a1f.gif . Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 5 / 31
Overview Example: elliptic curves Take M = H 1 ( E ) with E an elliptic curve over Q . If E has CM, then ST( M ) is the normalizer of SO(2 , R ) in SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D2_a1f.gif . Equidistribution follows easily from CM theory (Hecke). If E has no CM, then ST( M ) = SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D1_a1f.gif Equidistribution (i.e., the original Sato-Tate conjecture) is known but hard: it uses potential modularity of symmetric power L -functions (Taylor et al.). If we consider E over a number field K , then the CM picture changes if the CM field is contained in K , as ST( M ) decreases to SO(2 , R ): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D3_a1f.gif . Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 5 / 31
Overview Example: elliptic curves Take M = H 1 ( E ) with E an elliptic curve over Q . If E has CM, then ST( M ) is the normalizer of SO(2 , R ) in SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D2_a1f.gif . Equidistribution follows easily from CM theory (Hecke). If E has no CM, then ST( M ) = SU(2): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D1_a1f.gif Equidistribution (i.e., the original Sato-Tate conjecture) is known but hard: it uses potential modularity of symmetric power L -functions (Taylor et al.). If we consider E over a number field K , then the CM picture changes if the CM field is contained in K , as ST( M ) decreases to SO(2 , R ): http://math.mit.edu/~drew/g1_D3_a1f.gif . Kiran S. Kedlaya (UCSD/ICERM) Sato-Tate groups of higher weight motives ICERM, October 23, 2015 5 / 31

Download Presentation

Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

More recommend