Rydal Park: Medical Center Addition Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 12 th , 2010 Consultant: Dr. Magent Matthew Dabrowski Aerial View of the Medical Center Addition Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Presentation Outline I. Introduction II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Energy Efficiency IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Feasibility V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements VII. Questions Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Project Background Rydal Park CCRC Medical Center Project Title: Facility for the Memory Impaired Function: Presentation Outline: Rydal Park, Jenkintown, PA Location: I. Introduction $26,590,000 A. Project Background Project Cost: II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery Nov 2009 – May 2011 Construction duration: III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency 142,862 SF / 5 Stories (2 Parking / 3 Living) Building Size: IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis Design-Bid-Build & Project Delivery Method: Negotiated GMP V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: Location – Jenkintown, PA 1 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Project Team Presby’s Inspired Life Owner: Architect: Stewart & Conners Architects Presentation Outline: Construction Manager: Whiting- Turner I. Introduction Developer: Greenbrier Development B. Project Team Structural Engineer: WK Dickson & Co. II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery MEP Engineer: Moore Enigneering Co. III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: project delivery org chart 2 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Overview of Analysis Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery Critical Industry Issue / MAE • Presentation Outline: Pinpoint elements of success to guide future projects • I. Introduction Analysis II: HVAC System energy Efficiency C. Analyses Overview Mechanical Breadth • Decrease energy consumption with an Alt. HVAC system II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery • III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency Analysis III: Photovoltaic Panel Feasibility IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis Structural Breadth / MAE • Determine appropriateness with a Life Cycle Cost • V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: Various analysis Images 2 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Introduction and Background PACE Fall 2009: Participant, “A successful Design-Build Project?” Presentation Outline: Penn State Owner, Architect, Contractor Project Team: I. Introduction Disconnected, Lacking Collaboration PACE • II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery Fragmentized preconstruction period • A. Introduction and Background Research Goal (critical industry issue) III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency Industry Students pinpoint successful elements within the Integrated Project • Delivery model IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis Outline IPD characteristics for improving efficiency within • V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations the Rydal Park OAC project team Improve efficiency within the cm industry • Figure: s:pace logo & productivity index 4 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Integrated Project delivery Defining Elements: Presentation Outline: Early involvement of key participants • Shared risk / reward through Multi-party contracting • I. Introduction Collaborative decision making • Liability waivers / indemnification II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery • C. AIA IPD Traditional vs. IPD Reallocation of upfront efforts • III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency Linear Design Process vs. Radial Inputs • IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: Design Process 5 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
AIA’s Contract Language AIA’s 195 Family of Documents Presentation Outline: No significant differences to AIA cm @ risk contract • I. Introduction Tom Krajewski, DPR Project Executive: II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery “I Call These AIA 195 Documents CM (@ risk) with a hug. The Contractor becomes the hook to keep the design within C. AIA’s IPD: Contract Language the GMP . The general conditions are supposed to bind everyone but the language still allows people to point III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency fingers at other parties.” IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: aia, ipd and dpr logos 6 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Case Studies Five Case studies Analyzed (2005-2009): Presentation Outline: Autodesk inc. Solutions Headquarters • Sutter Health Fairfield Medical Office Building • I. Introduction St. Clare health Center • Encircle Health Ambulatory Care Center II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery • Cardinal Glennon Children’s Hospital • D. Case Studies Case studies were explored for: III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency Lessons learned • IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis Elements of success • V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: Summary of IPD Case Studies 7 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
OAC Project Team AE 572: Project Delivery and Contract Strategies Pinpointed critical project success factors • Design build extremely viable option Presentation Outline: • Owner (Presby’s Inspired Life): I. Introduction Lacking experience, looking to improve • II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery Architect (Stewart-Conners): Young Company, specializing in Lodging • E. Rydal Park OAC Project Team Construction Manager (Whiting-Turner): III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency Experienced, well established in SE pennsylvania • Developer (Greenbrier): IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis Experience, Specializes IN CCRC’s, Located in Texas • V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: Delivery and Contract Strageies 8 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Preconstruction Timeline Timeline developed after a project manager Interview (chip Cinamella) and reviewing precon documents Presentation Outline: Inefficient Elements: I. Introduction CM hired April 2008, not utilized for 7 months • II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery Locations of the Architect and Developer • Owner placed project out to bid 9 months after cm was already • F. Detailed Preconstruction Timeline awarded contract improperly utilized “Value Engineering” session begins • III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency January-October 2009: Project hanging on 1.5% of total estimate • IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations Figure: Precon Timeline Jan – July 2009 9 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
IPD Strategies Outline 12 Key Elements: 12 Key elements: 8. & 9. Designer / CM Roles (Different during Design & 1 . Owner Involvement: Determine Level and Adhere Constr. Phases): Outline professional boundaries Presentation Outline: 2. Budget Estimate: Determine if project is feasible 10. Meetings: Weekly Face-to-Face collaborative discussions I. Introduction 3. Core Team: Establish early, Utilize all parties 11. Drawings and Specifications: Manage Releases of II. Analysis I: Integrated Project Delivery addenda material properly, don’t hind info from subs 4. Contracting: Indemnification, “No-Sue” and relational G. IPD Strategies Outline 12. Closeout: All parties on excellent business terms by end of 5. Project Team Norms: Transparent / Cooperative Mgmt III. Analysis II: Mechanical System Efficiency project, Owner confident with IPD 6. 100% Open Books : All parties develop GMP , New Fee IV. Analysis III: Photovoltaic Array Analysis Structures required, Potential to create industry standard V. Final Conclusions and Recommendations 7. BIM Execution: Utilized new and effective technology Do not undermine: TRUST 10 Matthew Dabrowski – Construction Management Architectural Engineering Spring 2010 – Senior Thesis
Recommend
More recommend
