1
RF Cavity Breakdown Localization: Sensor and Signal Studies on Al - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
RF Cavity Breakdown Localization: Sensor and Signal Studies on Al - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
RF Cavity Breakdown Localization: Sensor and Signal Studies on Al Disk Peter Lane Pavel Snopok 1 Overall Setup Aluminum disk from mock cavity as medium Ultrasonic ping generator Sensors and speaker around disk circumference
2
Overall Setup
- Aluminum disk from mock cavity as medium
- Ultrasonic “ping” generator
- Sensors and speaker around disk
circumference
3
Ultrasonic Ping Generator
- 555 for pulse width and pulse frequency
- 555 for signal frequency
- LM386 audio amplifier driving the transducer
- Scavenged piezoelectric transducer
- Separate 9V wall adapter powering the circuit
– signal pollution and battery voltage issues
4
Sensor Calibration
- Check that sensor polarities are the same
- Check that sensor response is similar
- Input Signal
– One pulse every 3.6 s – Pulse width of 0.48 ms – Signal frequency of 79 kHz
- Positioned speaker and sensor next to each
- ther on side of Al disk
5
Sensor Calibration Setup
6
Sensor Polarity
7
Sensor Response
8
Sensor Calibration Conclusions
- Polarities are all the same.
– Any polarity flips would have to come from
reflections at metal/air boundary.
- Amplitudes can vary among sensors by ~2V.
– Makes relative peak finding more difficult. – Hypothesis: Any signal which is observed
having a uniform amplitude on all channels is EMI.
9
3-Channel Signal Analysis
- Use a consistent acoustic signal to better
understand what is happening inside the cavity walls.
- Input Signal
– One pulse every 270 ms – Pulse width of 32 µs – Signal frequency of 120 kHz
- Senors placed at 90 degree intervals around
the circumference
10
3-Channel Signal Setup
11
3-Channel Signal Overview
12
2D Modeling of the Disk
- Model a pressure wave with the same
symmetric arrangement of sensors as before
13
Asymmetric Source Signal Simulation
14
3-Channel Signal Conclusions
- Signal envelope mean lifetime about 9 ms.
- Sensors close to the source are clean.
- Sensor further from the source is dirty due to
reflection interference.
- Envelope oscillations due to reflections
- Time domain wave front detection is rather
difficult even with nice input signals
15
Alternative Ideas for Wave Front Detection
- Integrate sensor data backwards in time to
reconstruct the source position
– Too computationally intensive for an online tool
- Use signal database or neural network
– Requires the luxury of training on known
- utcomes
- Sensor symmetry correlations
– Try to match signals from symmetrically placed
sensors
16
Alternative Ideas for Wave Front Detection
- Rolling FFT idea from Keith Pedersen
– Density plots show visible bands at points in
time related to the beginning of the pulse
– Need to see if this has sufficient resolution and
can be turned into an detection algorithm
– Will experiment with this if there are no other
suggestions
- Need DAQ card to experiment in realtime