rf cavity breakdown localization
play

RF Cavity Breakdown Localization: Sensor and Signal Studies on Al - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RF Cavity Breakdown Localization: Sensor and Signal Studies on Al Disk Peter Lane Pavel Snopok 1 Overall Setup Aluminum disk from mock cavity as medium Ultrasonic ping generator Sensors and speaker around disk circumference


  1. RF Cavity Breakdown Localization: Sensor and Signal Studies on Al Disk Peter Lane Pavel Snopok 1

  2. Overall Setup ● Aluminum disk from mock cavity as medium ● Ultrasonic “ping” generator ● Sensors and speaker around disk circumference 2

  3. Ultrasonic Ping Generator ● 555 for pulse width and pulse frequency ● 555 for signal frequency ● LM386 audio amplifier driving the transducer ● Scavenged piezoelectric transducer ● Separate 9V wall adapter powering the circuit – signal pollution and battery voltage issues 3

  4. Sensor Calibration ● Check that sensor polarities are the same ● Check that sensor response is similar ● Input Signal – One pulse every 3.6 s – Pulse width of 0.48 ms – Signal frequency of 79 kHz ● Positioned speaker and sensor next to each other on side of Al disk 4

  5. Sensor Calibration Setup 5

  6. Sensor Polarity 6

  7. Sensor Response 7

  8. Sensor Calibration Conclusions ● Polarities are all the same. – Any polarity flips would have to come from reflections at metal/air boundary. ● Amplitudes can vary among sensors by ~2V. – Makes relative peak finding more difficult. – Hypothesis: Any signal which is observed having a uniform amplitude on all channels is EMI. 8

  9. 3-Channel Signal Analysis ● Use a consistent acoustic signal to better understand what is happening inside the cavity walls. ● Input Signal – One pulse every 270 ms – Pulse width of 32 µ s – Signal frequency of 120 kHz ● Senors placed at 90 degree intervals around the circumference 9

  10. 3-Channel Signal Setup 10

  11. 3-Channel Signal Overview 11

  12. 2D Modeling of the Disk ● Model a pressure wave with the same symmetric arrangement of sensors as before 12

  13. Asymmetric Source Signal Simulation 13

  14. 3-Channel Signal Conclusions ● Signal envelope mean lifetime about 9 ms. ● Sensors close to the source are clean. ● Sensor further from the source is dirty due to reflection interference. ● Envelope oscillations due to reflections ● Time domain wave front detection is rather difficult even with nice input signals 14

  15. Alternative Ideas for Wave Front Detection ● Integrate sensor data backwards in time to reconstruct the source position – Too computationally intensive for an online tool ● Use signal database or neural network – Requires the luxury of training on known outcomes ● Sensor symmetry correlations – Try to match signals from symmetrically placed sensors 15

  16. Alternative Ideas for Wave Front Detection ● Rolling FFT idea from Keith Pedersen – Density plots show visible bands at points in time related to the beginning of the pulse – Need to see if this has sufficient resolution and can be turned into an detection algorithm – Will experiment with this if there are no other suggestions ● Need DAQ card to experiment in realtime 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend