Results Based Advocacy to Increase Access Marie Stopes - - PDF document

Results Based Advocacy to Increase Access Marie Stopes International

Results Based Advocacy

2

“Women don’t lease their bodies from the state or church, they own them.” Founder, Tim Black (1937 – 2014)

Almost all of the health services we provide throughout our global partnership are affected by over-regulation and over-medicalisation. These unnecessary legal or regulatory restrictions exacerbate the existing cultural, economic, religious and social barriers that prevent women and girls from seeking and receiving the care and services they want. Our 2020 Strategic Plan recognises that providing services alone will not secure universal access to contraception or safe abortion services, and that to deliver results at scale and achieve greater sustainability we need to transform the environment in which we operate. Advocacy by doing

Our recommendations are based on the needs of our clients and on innovations we’ve shown can work. Through provision of services, we are able to generate data and evidence about what works and where change is needed. Our research and analysis of this data then helps us to identify the barriers and system failures hindering service uptake, before determining the policy1 solutions that will help remove these barriers.

From policy to practice

Our voice is critical in ensuring that policies are supportive of access to contraception and safe abortion. Likewise, our contribution helps ensure that policies are fjt for purpose and informed by the latest medical guidance. By focussing on the policies and issues that affect the frontline of service delivery, we can streamline our advocacy efforts to achieve the maximum return on investment for our programmes. Our goal is to generate advocacy changes that translate into increased access to services on the ground. We refer to this entire approach as results based advocacy.

1 The term ‘policy’ refers to legislation, budgets and resourcing, guidelines, protocols and the regulatory environment. ‘Policy change’ includes

anything that requires intervention by the national, state or local government to evoke change, and to ensure that these changes are then

• perationalised and implemented.

Results Based Advocacy

3

Leveraging our role as a service provider

As health service providers, we are often the most credible and authoritative advocates for achieving change. By tailoring our efforts to specifjc policy changes and then implementing these policies in practice, we are saving and improving lives. Our role as service providers also gives us access to the ‘inside track’ with ministries and technical working groups. We use this access to work with decision makers behind the scenes to encourage debate and to share promising practises about what works. We leverage participation in these technical spheres to build political will for removing policy barriers and to expand our operational

• environment. This typically involves illustrating the wider benefjts of services,

piloting innovations, documenting the results of the pilot and conducting

• perational research to prove concepts. The evidence and recommendations

generated are then disseminated, used to mobilise support and to make the case to remove restrictions. Likewise, if there are supportive policies already in place but they are threatened, we work with partners to safeguard them. This ‘inside track’ approach means that we rarely lead on public campaigns

• r mass mobilisation. However, we are part of wider advocacy networks or

partnerships with other agencies, donors, professional organisations and other

• stakeholders. For more sensitive or controversial issues, we may fjnd it useful to

work with others who are able or willing to take a more public stance. In these instances, our role typically involves providing technical and discrete support behind the scenes.

Results based advocacy

• Change the laws, policies and practices that restrict access and fjnd

solutions to constructively and creatively remove restrictions;

• Ensure that the progressive policies and commitments that do exist are

understood, implemented and resourced;

• Safeguard existing supportive policies and commitments;
• Increase global and national investments and resources for contraception

and safe abortion services – this includes public, donor and private support;

• Track results to continuously strengthen our advocacy efforts over time,

ensuring that we communicate our contribution to tangible changes. Through our results based advocacy, we aim to:

Results Based Advocacy

4

Recent successes

• Nigeria – A wide-reaching Task Shifting and Sharing Policy for Essential

Health Services, extending the right for Community Health Extension Workers to deliver a broad range of health services including implants and IUDs.

• Sri Lanka and Myanmar – New Post-Abortion Care guidelines developed

and approved by national Ministries of Health .

• Ethiopia – New guidelines permitting abortions to be carried out at

primary health clinics, including authorisation of nurses to perform medical abortions.

• Bangladesh – New regulations that permit the use of misoprostol for

Menstrual Regulation. Medical Menstrual Regulation will also be included as a service covered under the government’s national family planning programme.

• Afghanistan – Progesterone-only pill added to the Essential Drug List; with

the Ministry of Public Health approving MSI Afghanistan to use misoprostol for post-abortion care in MSI clinics. A pilot project secured for mid-level providers to insert implants.

• Sierra Leone – Mifepristone (Mediprist) was registered for use.

Our inside track approach to advocacy has yielded some recent successes throughout the global partnership, including:

Results Based Advocacy

5

Thematic areas

Potential strategies to address thematic areas Increasing access to contraception, with a focus on reaching the most marginalised and excluded groups.

• Task sharing to remove restrictions on the

services authorised for provision by different cadres of health workers (authorisation or approval, amending curricula or guidelines) informed by WHO’s Global Guidance.

• Registration and supply of commodities;

including import tariffs or obstructing customs procedures.

• Removal of age restrictions or third party

consent. Increasing access to safe abortion and post- abortion care, with a focus on reaching the most marginalised and excluded groups.

• Increasing indications for safe abortion.
• Safe abortion/post-abortion care guidelines.
• Removal of third party consent.
• Registration and supply of safe abortion

commodities. Holding governments and donors to account for commitments made and pushing for increased recognition and prioritisation of SRHR.

• Revising and updating national policies.
• Securing specifjc budget lines.
• Infmuencing government funding decisions.
• Roll-out of costed implementation plans or
• ther national action plans

(e.g. Global Financing Facility, Ouagadougou Partnership, FP2020, etc). Ensuring equitable, effjcient and sustainable fjnancing for services.

• Building confjdence, skills and willingness of

governments to contract out services.

• Advocating for inclusion of services within

basic UHC packages (e.g. contraception counselling and supplies).

Results Based Advocacy

6

Our added value

Our advocacy goes beyond infmuencing alone. We use our expertise and existing country programmes to support governments to operationalise policy. Through pioneering practices informed by WHO global guidance, we strengthen health systems by working with governments to roll out, scale up and implement policy, thereby increasing sustainable access to services. Our unique institutional strengths make us an effective and strategic partner, with core strengths including:

9Capacity to bridge the public and private sectors; 9A reputation for expertise and impact in client-focussed service delivery; 9Knowledge of international best practices and guidance; 9Existing relationships with government and medical professional

associations; and

9A strong research and evidence base.

As a service provider, we have a duty to shape and protect our operating environment for the benefjt of our clients. Our unique blend of working on the inside track and in partnership to infmuence and pioneer change ensures that our advocacy has real impact.

Conceptualising

• ur approach to

advocacy

Universal access to SA and FP services Advocacy

Removing policy restrictions Protecting good policy Policy implementation , piloting innovations, strengthening health systems by scaling up

Evidence generation

Improved supply Increased demand

Evidence based advocacy