Restorative Justice Re- -design design Restorative Justice Re August 2009 August 2009 Summary comparison of the current Summary comparison of the current program against the re- -designed designed program against the re program program Re Re- -design process design process Details of the objective tools to be Details of the objective tools to be utilized in the re- utilized in the re -designed program designed program Details of services to be provided in the Details of services to be provided in the re- re -designed program designed program 1
Current Program vs. RJP Re- -design design Current Program vs. RJP Re Targets early offenders Targets early offenders Targets early offenders Targets early offenders P.O. experience determines P.O. experience determines Objective tools determine Objective tools determine type of service referrals type of service referrals types of services indicated types of services indicated 90 day program Length of program varies by 90 day program Length of program varies by need (up to 180 days) need (up to 180 days) Logic model also measures Logic model also measures Logic model measures effort Logic model measures effort effort for select non- effort for select non -contracted contracted and effect of contracted and effect of contracted services services services. services. Current Program vs. RJP Re- -design design Current Program vs. RJP Re Services Services Competency Development Competency Development Competency Development Competency Development Services including Services including Services including Services including counseling counseling counseling counseling Mentoring Mentoring Mentoring Mentoring Parent- -Teen Mediation Teen Mediation Parent Parenting Classes Parenting Classes 1 day classes 1 day classes Victim services Victim services Job skill and search services Job skill and search services Support services Support services Family therapy Family therapy 2
FY 2008 Data Analysis - - Referrals Referrals FY 2008 Data Analysis 5797 Referrals 5797 Referrals 95% of referrals for offenses such as: 95% of referrals for offenses such as: petty theft (1055), petty theft (1055), fighting/misdemeanor assault (1048), fighting/misdemeanor assault (1048), obstruction (650), obstruction (650), simple possession (541), simple possession (541), vandalism (470), vandalism (470), drunk in public (296), drunk in public (296), trespassing (280), trespassing (280), tobacco (269) tobacco (269) FY 2008 Data Analysis - - Youth Youth FY 2008 Data Analysis 4984 youth 4984 youth st time offenders 87% 1 st 87% 1 time offenders nd time offenders 11% 2 11% 2 nd time offenders rd + offenders 2% are 3 rd 2% are 3 + offenders 3
RJP Asset Distribution RJP Asset Distribution Low Percent of Med/ High Percent of Low Percent of Med/ High Percent of Assets Youth Assets Youth Assets Youth Assets Youth East East 31% 31% East East 22% 22% West 24% West 22% West 24% West 22% North North 15% 15% North North 32% 32% South 30% South 23% South 30% South 23% Re- -design Process design Process Re Ad Ad- -hoc Committee and Subcommittee hoc Committee and Subcommittee input input Bobbie Huskey & Associates’ literature Bobbie Huskey & Associates’ literature review and consultation review and consultation Researched various diversion programs to Researched various diversion programs to understand a number of models understand a number of models 4
Balanced Restorative Justice Model Balanced Restorative Justice Model t n Community Protection e m p o l e v e D y c n e t e p m o C Accountability Proposed Program Proposed Program t Needs assessmnt/targetd services n Community Protection e m p o l e v Offense matrix e D y c n e t e p m o C Level of service matrix Accountability 5
Needs Assessment/Targeted Services Needs Assessment/Targeted Services Needs assessment leads to targeted services to Needs assessment leads to targeted services to address four life domains (personal, family, address four life domains (personal, family, school, community) school, community) Conduct needs assessment on approximately Conduct needs assessment on approximately 20% of youth based on analysis of 4984 youth 20% of youth based on analysis of 4984 youth An intervention team approach, when An intervention team approach, when appropriate appropriate Offense Levels Offense Levels 1 1 - - Low level offenses include offenses with no victim Low level offenses include offenses with no victim and no time misdemeanors and infractions (offenses not and no time misdemeanors and infractions (offenses not requiring a JRS entry) requiring a JRS entry) 3 3 - - Medium level offenses include offenses with an Medium level offenses include offenses with an identifiable victim and restitution totaling less than $500 identifiable victim and restitution totaling less than $500 5 5 - - High level offenses include either an identifiable High level offenses include either an identifiable victim, restitution totaling more than $500 but less than victim, restitution totaling more than $500 but less than $1000, a felony, or other serious offense(s) $1000, a felony, or other serious offense(s) 6
Offense Matrix Offense Matrix S Offense Matrix e r i 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 o u 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 s n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e s s 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of Referrals Levels of Service Levels of Service Total Score of Total Score of 1 1- -3 3: Low : Low S O ffense M atrix level of service level of service e r i Total Score of Total Score of 4 4- -5 5: Med : Med 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 o u 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 level of service level of service s n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e Total Score of Total Score of 6 6- -7 7: High : High s s 1 2 3 4 5 6 level of service level of service N um ber of R eferrals Total Score of Total Score of 8+ 8+ : : Informal Supervision Informal Supervision 7
Low Level of Service (1 (1- -3) 3) Low Level of Service Assessment: P.O. evaluation of JCR and Assessment: P.O. evaluation of JCR and minor’s history. The PO has discretion to minor’s history. The PO has discretion to raise the level of service by one level raise the level of service by one level Sanction: Letter of reprimand Sanction: Letter of reprimand Services: None indicated Services: None indicated Medium Level of Service (4 (4- -5) 5) Medium Level of Service Assessment: Assessment: P.O. evaluation or formal assessment tool depending on P.O. P.O. evaluation or formal assessment tool depending on P.O. discretion. The P.O. may raise or lower the level of service by discretion. The P.O. may raise or lower the level of service by one level based on the one level based on the results of the assessment tool. results of the assessment tool. Sanction(s): Sanction(s): Verbal reprimand Verbal reprimand Referral to Traffic Hearing Officer Referral to Traffic Hearing Officer 30 day contract to include: 30 day contract to include: Restitution Restitution Apology letter Apology letter 16 or less hours of community service 16 or less hours of community service Services: Services: Single 1 day competency development class such as COPS, SAVE, smoking cessation, etc. Single 1 day competency development class such as COPS, SAVE, sm oking cessation, etc. Referral to truancy programs, as needed. Referral to truancy programs, as needed. Victim awareness Victim awareness Parent- Parent -teen mediation teen mediation Parenting classes Parenting classes Job skill and search services (16.5+ years old) Job skill and search services (16.5+ years old) 8
Recommend
More recommend
