Restorative Justice November 19, 2015 Content of Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Restorative Justice November 19, 2015 Content of Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Restorative Justice November 19, 2015 Content of Presentation Review of Last Presentation Our Definition of Restorative Justice Why Implement Restorative Justice in Orange County Public Schools? Present Day and the Future of
Content of Presentation
2
- Review of Last Presentation
- Our Definition of Restorative Justice
- Why Implement Restorative Justice in Orange County Public Schools?
- Present Day and the Future of Restorative Justice in OCPS
- Summer Training and Support to Schools
- Collaborative Website-School Support
- Samples Restorative Justice Circles in OCPS
What is Restorative Justice?
3
Restorative practices in schools are fundamentally about building school culture based on a set of restorative values that are established and co-created by all members of the school
- community. When a conflict occurs, it is addressed by rebuilding
damaged relationships and repairing harm directly to the individuals and communities who have been harmed.
What is Restorative Justice?
4
In Orange County Public Schools, the process:
- focuses on relationships (restores/repairs)
- gives voice to the person harmed and the person who caused the
harm
- engages in collaborative problem-solving
- enhances personal responsibility
- empowers change and growth
Why Implement RJ in OCPS?
- Higher suspension rates result in lower academic achievement and
standardized test scores, even when controlling for factors such as race and socioeconomic status (Davis et al, 1994; Mendez, et al., 2003; Skiba 2006)
- Suspended/expelled students are more likely to be held back, not graduate,
become involved in the justice system, have additional suspensions, expulsions and dropouts (Fabelo et al, 2011; Osher, 2010; Balfanz and Boccanfuso, 2007; Skiba and Rausch, 2006)
- Black students are likely to be suspended and expelled for minor infractions, are
suspended at two to three times the rate of white peers, especially among those with learning disabilities, and are four times more likely to be placed in correctional facilities (Advancement Project, 2005; Losen and Martinez, 2012; Fabelo et al. 2011; NAACP, 2005; Poe-
Yamagata and Jones, 2000) 5
Why Implement RJ in OCPS
6
Black 54% Hispanic 31% White 15%
High School
Black 65% Hispanic 26% White 9%
Middle School
2014-2015 Suspension Data
Restorative Justice Timeline
RJ 3-day rigorous professional development for all middle schools Develop RJ collaborative site for middle schools RJ Roll Out RJ ongoing professional development, support and monitoring Phase 2 planning: High School (implementation next year)
7
Restorative Justice Professional Development
228 district administrators and school teams (administration and faculty from 38 middle schools) received 3-day trainings in July to learn how to implement restorative justice at their individual sites
8
Restorative Justice Professional Development
- Summer Training conducted by Dr. Martha (Mara) Schiff
- Associate Professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal
Justice at Florida Atlantic University and President of PeaceWorks Consulting, Inc.
- Over 30 years’ experience in criminal and juvenile justice research,
planning, evaluation, training and teaching, focusing on restorative community and justice
9
Restorative Justice Professional Development
RJ Trainers
- Ms. LaVonne Walker, Indian River County
- Mr. Keith Wright, Palm Beach School District
- Mrs. Dumosire Wright, Palm Beach School District
RJ Cultural Diversity Presenters
- Van P. Williams (Palm Beach State College)
- Barbara Cheives (Converge Associates Consulting)
10
Technical Assistance by Dr. Schiff
- Helped develop a district strategic plan
- Assisted us in learning how to measure progress, identify obstacles,
re-evaluate as necessary.
- Helped develop procedures and guidelines for implementation
- Taught us how to troubleshoot and problem solve implementation
issues as they arise
- Will be observing Restorative Justice circle facilitation
- Will facilitate monthly or quarterly group meetings as needed
11
District Support to the Schools
- Area Administrators developed guidelines to determine when
to assign PASS or OSS days
- Training with circles will be ongoing
- Monthly reports will be generated based on circles
- RJ Teams at schools will have quarterly meetings with Area
Administrators
- MAO will monitor school progress and offer support
12
Restorative Justice Collaborative Site
Restorative Justice (RJ) Schools Toolkit:
- RJ Implementation Power Points
- Examples of Restorative Circles Scripts
- Examples of Affective Questions & Statements to be used in
Restorative Chats or Conference Preparation
- Restorative Justice Conference Facilitator Script-
Acknowledged Harm/Accepted Responsibility
13
Restorative Justice Collaborative Site
http://collaboration.ocps.net/team/mao/restorejustice
14
Circles
Community Building (Level 1) Low-level Discipline, Conflicts, Problems (addressed within the classroom) – (Level 2) Serious Discipline Matters (addressed outside the classroom) – (Level 3)
Making personal connections Restorative Inquiry (one-to-one conversations during class or assigned after-school “detention” within the classroom, using restorative questions) Resolution Circles Restorative Conversations (“What’s up?”) Collaborative Problem-solving Restorative Conferences (includes student, family and other key people Community Circles: Classrooms, Teams Other small groups: With faculty With parents Peer Mediation Restorative Inquiry used for in-school suspension
15
Types of Circles
16
33 37 27
Types of Circles by Percentage
Community Relationship Building Low-Level Discipline Serious Discipline
Areas of Focus for Year One
17
- Insubordination
- 1H Insubordination
- 2F Insubordination/Open
Defiance
- 3H Gross
Insubordination/Open Defiance
- Disrespect
- 1D Disrespect
- 2B Disrespect
- 3D Disrespect
- Fighting
- 2C Fighting
- 3F Fighting
Infractions Data
18
30 15 39 24 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1D - Disrespect 1H - Insubordination
Level 1
2014 2015
3 RJ Circles
331 238 466 281 218 357 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 2B - Disrespect 2C - Fighting 2F - Insubord/Defiant
Level 2
2014 2015
Infractions Data
19 7 RJ Circles 25 RJ Circles 4 RJ Circles
214 440 308 160 416 333 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 3D - Disrespect 3F - Fighting 3H - Gross Insubord/Open Defiant
Level 3
2014 2015
Infractions Data
20 9 RJ Circles 10 RJ Circles
First Quarter Middle School Total Number of OSS Days
21 4,564 3,830 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,800 # of Suspension Days 2014-2015 2015-2016
Apopka Middle School
22
Level 3 – Serious Discipline Matters
Bridgewater Middle School
23
Introduction of Circles and Level 1 – Community Circle, Establishing Classroom Ground Rules
Legacy Middle School
24
Level 1 – Community Circle with possible peer facilitators
Liberty Middle School
25
Level 2 – Low-level Discipline, Conflicts,
Problems
Lockhart Middle School
Level 3 – Serious Discipline Matters Circle in PASS
26
Maitland Middle School
Level 2 – Discipline/Conflict Problem
27
Meadowoods Middle School
Level 2 – Discipline/Conflict Problem
28
Memorial Middle School
18
Level 1 – Community Circle of Faculty and Staff Level 1 – Community Circle of Students
Westridge Middle School
30
Level 2 – Low-Level Circle with Students
Wolf Lake Middle School
31
Level 2 – Low-Level Circle with Students
When Restorative Justice works, schools will . . .
- Develop emotional literacy, conflict resolution skills, truth
recognition, accountability, responsibility
- Improve behavior, attendance, learning, teaching
- Increase empathy, happiness, positive life skills
- Reduce exclusions, detentions, conflict, bullying, suspensions
32
Conclusion
Discipline is a long-term process that leads children to become responsible. Punishment
- ften has negative side effects, but restorative
justice/practice promotes values and principles that are restorative (healing), inclusive and collaborative while giving voice to all parties who are a part of the community.
Debra Gore, OCPS Employee 33
Superintendent’s Comments School Board Questions and Discussion
34