Research Needs Masaki KITAZUME, Dr. Eng. Tokyo Institute of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Research Needs Masaki KITAZUME, Dr. Eng. Tokyo Institute of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
QC/QA for Deep Mixing - Current Practice and Future Research Needs Masaki KITAZUME, Dr. Eng. Tokyo Institute of Technology Factors Affecting Strength Increase 1. Characteristics of Type of binder binder Quantity Mixing water and additives
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
Factors Affecting Strength Increase
1. Characteristics of binder Type of binder Quantity Mixing water and additives 2. Characteristics and conditions of soil Physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of soil Organic content pH of pore water Water content 3. Mixing conditions Degree of mixing Timing of mixing/re-mixing Quantity of binder 4. Curing conditions Temperature Curing time Humidity Confining pressure Wetting and drying/freezing and thawing, etc.
2
Execution
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
cement silo slurry plant & agitator slurry pumps
3
Construction procedure
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
4 column
binder per min. binder per vol. torque of mixing shaft rpm of mixing shaft speed of mixing shaft depth of mixing shaft time
〇
mixing blades
〇 〇 〇
sand blanket
〇
principle of quality control
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
5
cement factor, F
c w v f F / 1 1 4
slurry
where F : cement factor (kg/m3) f : flow rate of cement slurry (m3/min) v : speed of mixing blade (m/min) w/c : water cement ratio of cement slurry slurry : unit weight of cement slurry (kg/m3)
u u d d
V N V N M T
where T : blade rotation number (n/m) M : total number of mixing blades Nd : blade rotation speed during penetration (rpm) Vd : blade penetration speed (m/min) Nu : blade rotational speed during withdrawal (rpm) Vu : blade withdrawal speed (m/min)
blade rotation number, T
Key factors for quality
- Effect of number of blades -
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
After Nishibayashi et al., 1985
Entrained rotation phenomenon, disturbed soft soil adheres to and rotates with the mixing blade without efficient mixing, may take place in one shaft blade, which decrease degree of mixing.
6
Key factors for quality
- Effect of blade shape -
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
Mixing blade type-A (Abe et al., 1997) Mixing blade type-B, comparison of quality with and without free blade (Enami et al., 1985)
7
Vertical wing enhances the up-down movement of soil together with the horizontal movement, that is effective for uniform mixing
Key factors for quality
- Effect of blade shape -
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
8
Rake angle
large rake angle enhances the up-down movement of soil together with the horizontal movement, that is effective for uniform mixing
Free blade and bracing plate
to prevent the "entrained rotation phenomenon."
Key factors for quality
- Effect of mixing efficiency -
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
Blade rotation number, T (times/m)
u u d d
V N V N M T
9
where T : blade rotation number (n/m) M : total number of mixing blades Nd : blade rotation speed during penetration (rpm) Vd : blade penetration speed (m/min) Nu : blade rotational speed during withdrawal (rpm) Vu : blade withdrawal speed (m/min)
Key factors for quality
- Effect of speed -
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
After Enami et al., 1986 After Nishibayashi et al., 1985 10
effect of rotation speed effect of penetration speed
strategy for quality control
inject small amount of slurry with low w/c ratio
economic, low ground heaving small size slurry pipe, easy to control flow rate of slurry low w/c ratio (large viscosity) of slurry requires large pump capacity chemical additives for reducing viscosity, install facility
inject large amount of slurry with high w/c ratio
less economic, large ground heaving large size slurry pipe, difficult to control flow rate of slurry in the case of low flow rate large w/c ratio (low viscosity) of slurry does not require large pump capacity no facility for chemical additives
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
11
strategy for quality control
large rake angle of mixing blade
up-down movement of soil enhances uniform and large strength large resistance requires large capacity mixing motor, low rpm is required chemical additive or air mist for reducing mixing energy
small rake angle of mixing blade
no up-down movement of soil makes uniform and large strength small resistance requires small capacity mixing motor, high rpm can be achieved no facility for chemical additive or air mist for reducing mixing energy
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
12
Construction procedure
- switching penetration injection to withdrawal injection,
bottom and surface treatment -
bottom treatment surface treatment
more cement and mixing are necessary more cement and mixing are necessary
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
13
Construction procedure, Example
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
14
200 400 600 800 1000
- 40.0
- 30.0
- 20.0
- 10.0
0.0 10.0 20 40 60 80 100
depth CL. (m)
Duaration time (min)
mixing blade (bottom) mixing blade (top) water soil layrs water injection binder injection mixing blade torque load
mixing blade cement injection torque water injection rpm
Construction procedure and analysis
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
15
- 30
- 20
- 10
10 100 200 300 400 500
depth CL. (m) Binder factor (kg/m3)
3EE013-09-L - 3EE-1 (Analysis)
BF water
- 30
- 20
- 10
10 2 4 6 8 10
depth CL. (m) W/C ratio
3EE013-09-L - 3EE-1 (Analysis)
W/C water soil layrs column
- 30
- 20
- 10
10 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
depth CL. (m) Binder content (%)
3EE013-09-L - 3EE-1 (Analysis)
BC water soil layrs column
- 30
- 20
- 10
10 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
depth CL. (m) qu (kN/m2)
3EE013-09-L - 3EE-1 (Analysis)
quf quf (estimate) water soil layrs column
W/C ratio Binder factor Binder content Measured and estimated USC
Quality of overlapping
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
16
rolling and pitching of barge
tidal wave, buoyancy force and soil resistance force of mixing shafts and blades weight loss of cement injected multiple mixing units enhance barge movements sufficient anchoring & ballast tanks are required to minimize the barge movements and assure the verticality.
soil resistance force during withdrawal buoyancy force soil resistance force during penetration
weight loss of cement
- verlap : 0.3 m
stabilized soil columns 100 1 30 3 . m m y verticalit at -30 m
Quality assurance
- Core sampling -
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
17
A Denison type sampler, double tube core sampler, or triple tube core sampler are recommended. A large diameter such as 86 mm or 116 mm is recommended.
RQD description of rock quality 0 - 25% very poor 25 - 50% poor 50 - 75% fair 75 - 90% good 90 - 100% excellent length run core Total 10cm pieces core
- f
length
RQD
The RQD (Rock Quality Designation) index
Quality assurance
- Laboratory test -
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
18
Unconfined compression test
specimen: 5 cm x 10 cm loading speed: 1 %/min. data to be reported qu, qur, ef, E50, E50/qu t, d, w (%)
Concluding remarks
Quality control
quality control is essential for assuring the uniformity and strength and the verticality of stabilized soil column
Quality assurance
core sampling and unconfined compression test are necessary
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
19
Thank you for your kind attention
May 30, 2019
- M. Kitazume (TIT)
20