Republic of North Macedonia engaging with the GCF through the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

republic of north macedonia engaging
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Republic of North Macedonia engaging with the GCF through the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 st Accreditation Webinar: Direct Access to Climate Finance: Supporting national entities in the Republic of North Macedonia engaging with the GCF through the accreditation process Second Readiness project Aug 12, 2020 Strengthening


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1st Accreditation Webinar:

“Direct Access to Climate Finance: Supporting national entities in the Republic of North Macedonia engaging with the GCF through the accreditation process”

Strengthening country capacities for climate change adaptation and mitigation and finalization of country work programme for the Republic of North Macedonia

Aug 12, 2020

Second Readiness project

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. Institutional Capacity & Coordination

Mechanism

  • 3. Direct Access to Climate Finance

2

  • 2. Country Programming process
  • 4. Climate finance Strategy & Project

Pipeline

Components of 2nd Readiness

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

OBJECTIVE

» Initiate the discussion about the different modalities through which national entities can engage with the GCF. » Provide detailed information regarding the GCF accreditation process as one of the access modalities to GCF resources. » Guide national stakeholders on the steps, criteria and requirements to be met if interested in becoming a GCF accredited entity in North Macedonia.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Section 1: Engaging with the GCF

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Strong climate rationale Six Investment Criterias Country Driven Approach Compliace with GCF Policies Completeness of documentation

Working with the GCF

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

GCF Investment Criteria

Strengthening country capacities for climate change adaptation and mitigation and finalization of country work programme for the Republic of North Macedonia

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

GCF Architecture

Financial Instruments

Grants Loans Guarantees Equity

» GCF business model relies on AEs for delivering its mandate and implementing its investments (P/P).

» Accreditation is one of the ways to engage with the GCF. Non-accredited entities can:

  • Submit funding proposal through an AE
  • Partner with an AE on implementing an approved GCF P/P;
  • Co-financing projects with an already AE, and as a
  • Readiness

delivery partner, entity must demonstrate relevant experience and ability to implement projects. 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Accredited Entity vs. Executing Entity

Accredited Entity (AE)

» Develop & submit funding proposal for P/P . » Oversee P/P management & implementation » Deploy & administrate a range of financial instruments » Mobilize private sector capital for blending with GCF and/or own resources

Executing Entity (EE)

» Develop & submit funding proposal through AE. » Execute funding proposals » No need for accreditation but work under supervision & overall management of AE

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

GCF Accredited Entities

Strengthening country capacities for climate change adaptation and mitigation and finalization of country work programme for the Republic of North Macedonia

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GCF IN EASTERN EUROPE & CENTRAL ASIA

Strengthening country capacities for climate change adaptation and mitigation and finalization of country work programme for the Republic of North Macedonia

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Section 2: Key elements of the GCF Accreditation Process

11

https://www.greenclimate.fund/accreditation/process

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What is the accreditation process?

Thorough assessment of entities institutional arrangement & track record, designed to ensure that entities can manage the Fund’s resources according to international standards.

Who can apply for accreditation?

National, subnational, regional & international public/private entities

When can entities star applying for GCF-AP?

Any time – follow NDA prioritization procedure

Who is the NDA in North Macedonia?

Cabinet of the Deputy Prime Minister in Charge of Economic Affairs and Coordination of Economic Sectors

About the GCF accreditation process

12

https://www.greenclimate.fund/countries/north-macedonia

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Regional, national and sub-nation entities.
  • Need a nomination letter from the NDA of the country/countries they intend to operate.
  • May be eligible to receive GCF readiness support.
  • 1. Direct Access Modality
  • Include: UN agencies, MDBs, international financial institutions and regional institutions.
  • Do not need to be nominated by developing country NDA.
  • 2. International Access Modality

Accreditation Modalities

13

Normal track Vs. Fast-track*

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Main accreditation stakeholders

» NDA: Strategic oversight + provide Nomination Letter to potential DAE » GCF Secretariat: 1st filter, conduct institutional review & completeness check. » Accreditation Panel: more detailed assessment + recommend conditions for accreditation. » GCF Board: final decision (accredited an entity or withdraw its application)

14 NDA Accredited Entity GCF Secretariat GCF Accreditation Panel GCF Board

Others: CSO Advocacy & watchdog (enhance transparency)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fit-for-Purpose Approach

15

Mandate & track record

  • Alignment with Fund
  • bjectives
  • At least 3 year of
  • perations

Project size

  • Micro ( <10M)
  • Small (10-50M)
  • Medium (50-250M)
  • Large ( >250M)

Fiduciary functions

  • Basic
  • Specialized

Environment & social risk category

  • A (high)
  • B (medium)
  • C (minimal or no)
  • Project Management
  • Grand award and/or

allocation mechanism

  • On-lending and/or blending

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fit-for-Purpose Approach

16 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ACCREDITATION STAGES

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Online Accreditation System (OAS) is a secure internet platform through which applicant submits Application Form. Payment of Accreditation Fee: only after this fee is paid, the GCF Secretariat will conduct the Completeness Check.

STAGE 1 - Completeness check

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

STAGE 1I – Accreditation review & decision

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

STAGE III – Accreditation review & decision

» Depending on the type of entity, the relationship between the Fund and such entity would take the form of either a legal agreement (contract governed by private law)

  • r

a legal arrangement (arrangement governed by international public law). » A contract is typically entered into with a private-sector entity

  • r

state-owned enterprise or takes the form.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Fees are NON-REFUNDABLE, regardless if the the entity is accredited or not OTHER FEES (case-by-case) if the application is reviewed by the GCF Secretariat/AP more than twice

Project Size Basic Fee Additional Fee

T

  • tal projected costs at time of

application, irrespective of portion funded by GCF Fee Level for accreditation for Basic Fiduciary Standards +ESS + Gender Fees for Specialized Fiduciary Standard: a) Project Management + b) Grants/funding and, + c) On-lending and/or blending

MICRO (≤ US$10 M) a) Subnational & national entities in developing countries including SIDS and LDCs: no fee b) All other entities: US$1,000 US$500 each SMALL (>US$10 M ≤ US$50 M) a) SIDS and LDCs: NO fee b) Subnational & national entities in developing countries, not SIDS and LDC: US$ 3,000 c) All other entities: US$5,000 US$1,000 each MEDIUM >US$50 M ≤ US$250 M) US$10,000 US$3,000 each LARGE (>US$250 M) US$25,000 US$7,000 each

Accreditation fee

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Total projected costs at time

  • f

application, irrespective of portion funded by GCF, Fee Level for accreditation for Basic Fiduciary Standards, ESS and gender Fee Level for Specialized Fiduciary Standard: (i) Project Management, (ii) Grants/funding and, (iii) On-lending/blending SMALL (>US$10 M ≤ US$50 M) a) SIDS and LDCs: no fee b) Subnational & national entities in developing countries, not SIDS and LDC: US$ 3,000 c) All other entities: US$5,000 US$1,000 each Example National DAE General Standards = $3,000 Specialized Standards = $2,000

Example:

A national DAE from North Macedonia wishes to get accredited to manage & implement projects of ≤US$50 millions, under following functions:  Basic Fee: Basic Standard, ESS, Gender  Additional Fee = Project Management + Grants Award

Example: Accreditation fee

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Background and contact information of the applicant entity Ways in which the entity and its intended P/P will contribute to furthering the

  • bjectives of the GCF

Scope of intended P/P and estimated contribution requested for an individual project or activity

I II III

Basic fiduciary standard

IV

V. Specialized fiduciary standards

V

Environmental and social safeguards (ESS)

VI

VII. Gender

VII

GCF Accreditation Application

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1.1 Background and contact information

  • Legal name, type & of institution
  • Core business + Sectors that the entity operates
  • Registered address, website & focal point.

1.2 Background information on Track Record (P/P)

  • Size (cost US$) and types of P/P undertaken
  • Type of financial instruments deployed in P/P
  • E&S categories + track record with PS 2-8.

1.3 Background information on Accreditation by Other Funds or Institutions

  • Entities have been accredited by Global Environmental Facility (GEF), Adaptation Fund (AF), and Directorate-

General Development and Cooperation – EuropeAid of the European Commission (EU-DEVCO).

  • Certain eligibility criteria apply – can be enter Fast-track accreditation modality

Section I: Background & contact information of the applicant entity

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Optional for DAE:

  • A statement on how the entity intends to

strengthen capacities

  • r

support potential subnational, national, regional implementing entities &intermediaries in order to meet GCF accreditation requirements.

Section II: Ways in which the institution and its intended P/P will contribute to furthering GCF’s

  • bjectives

25

Provide statements on how it intends to contribute

  • Furthering the objectives of the GCF.
  • Supporting a country/region in the reduction of GHG

and/or in supporting their CC plans and strategies.

  • Statements should be consistent with GCF investment

framework + impact areas.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sector: agriculture, energy, livelihood, etc.), Theme (e.g. mitigation

  • r

adaptation), Size (scale

  • f

the intended activity, including estimated cost) and, Risk level

Note: take into consideration a Country-driven approach (includes: NDCs, NAMAs, NAPAs, etc.) + GENDER-SENSITIVE APPROACH.

Section III: Information on the scope of intended projects/programmes and estimated contribution requested for an individual project or activity within a programme

26

Type of P/P

Estimated maximum contribution amount for a project or activity to be requested from the Fund in US$ Type(s) of financial instrument(s) for intended activities;

Cost

Sources

  • f

additional finance, if applicable, for intended activities; Indication of the standards against which the application will be assessed: (e.g. applicable specialized specialized fiduciary standards, ESS risk level).

Other

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Section IV: Basic Fiduciary Standards

4.1 Key administrative & financial capacities 4.2 Transparency and accountability

Assesses the capacity to manage financial resources transparently and in line with the relevant regulations and laws. Ensure entities’ administration and management

  • perations conform to the required fiduciary standards

and that they have a track record of performing these activities effectively and efficiently. Cover the underlying principles of protection against financial mismanagement and other unlawful practices, to ensure that entities operate ethically, transparently and with full accountability.

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Key Admin inistrative & Fin Financia ial l Cap apacit ities

Section IV: Basic Fiduciary Standards

» Management and administrative capacities, » Financial management and accounting system (IGP) » Procedures in place for internal and external audits » Internal financial controls/control frameworks » Formal procurement standards, guidelines and systems

Tran ansparency & Accountabil ilit ity

» Documented code of ethics » Policy/process disclosure

  • f

conflicts

  • f

interest

  • r

equivalent » Capacity to prevent fraud, financial mismanagement and

  • ther forms of malpractice (policy of zero tolerance)

» Independent investigation function » Anti-money laundering & anti-terrorist financing

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Based in the applicant's experience & demonstrated track record, entities will have to decide on how they will operate/use the Fund’s resources

Section V: Specialized Fiduciary Standards

Project Management Grant award and/or funding allocation mechanism On-lending and/or blending

Entities that will manage & implement projects directly or indirectly (oversee) through other partners Intermediaries and implementing entities that will provide grants to third parties (e.g. call for proposal) Intermediaries and implementing entities that will use financial resources from the GCF to provide loans (lend or

  • n-lend

GCF resources) to

  • ther

actors or third party

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Examples Project management* Grant award and/or funding allocation mechanisms On-lending and/or blending Implementing P/P using Fund’s resources (grants or loans), where the project is executed by the entity itself o by other entity

Awarding grants to another entity (intermediary)

Managing lines of credit using the Fund’s resources

On-lend resources to other entity

Blending GCF’s resources with other resources (own or

  • thers)

Using Fund’s resources for guarantees or for equity investment

Specialized fiduciary functions

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

All institutions need to show that they have project management capacity: » identifying, preparing/formulating and appraising project/programmes, including tendering procedures for proposals, key performance indicators. » Project oversight & control: systems, procedure and overall capacity to prepare project implementation plans, budget, reporting guidelines, budget and timelines. » Monitoring and evaluating, detects, assesses, and provides management information about risks related to projects. Clear guidelines/policies on M&E with defines roles & responsibilities project and entity/portfolio level (separated from project origination & supervision functions). » Demonstrate a project-at-risk system and related project risk management capabilities to flag problems that might affects P/P performance/implementation.

Section V: Project Management

31

Assessment of the entity against this standard considers whether the entity is overseeing or implementing P/P.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Entities that will award grants to other actors/parties shall have transparent eligibility criteria & evaluation process + formally documented procedures for awarding grants to recipients, among others:

» Eligibility criteria and procedures for evaluating and awarding grants. » Information on evaluation committees to award or reject grants » Public access to information on beneficiaries and results. » Transparent allocation of financial resources, » Good standing with regards to multilateral funding

Section V: Grant award and/or funding allocation

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

» Registration and/or licensing by a financial oversight body or regulator in the country. » Institutional experience and existing arrangements/capacities for on-lending/blending (international/multilateral resources). » Creditworthiness & due diligence policies, processes and procedures. » Ensure financial resource management, including analysis of the lending portfolio of the intermediary. » Ensure public access to information on beneficiaries and results. » Demonstrate investment management, policies and systems, including in relation to portfolio management. » Prove capacity to channel funds transparently & effectively,and to transfer the GCF’s funding advantages to final beneficiaries. » Financial risk management, illustrate governance & organizational arrangements, including relationships between the treasury function and the operational side (front desk).

Section V: On-lending and/or blending

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

IFC Performance Standards

A or I-1

High risk

B or I-2

Moderate risk

C or I-3

Low risk

E&S Categories & Risk Screening

Environmental & Social Standards

https://www.ifc.org/performancestandards

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

» The assessment is commensurate to the E&S risk category, more stringent requirements will apply for high/medium category (contrary to a low risk category). » Demonstrate required capacity & experience: identify, categorize, evaluate, mitigate, manage & monitoring E&S risks and impacts related to their projects and activities. » Prove to have ESMS consistent or align with the IFC-PS or similar principles (e.g. Equator Principles, others*). » Entities seeking to be accredited for intermediary functions: demonstrate to have procedures and resources to conduct the E&S due diligence and oversee Executing Entities, and that the executing entities have the capacity and ESMS to fulfill the applicant entity’s E&S framework.

Section VI: Environmental & Social Safeguards

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Element of ESMS Low Risk – Category C/I-3 Medium or High Risk

Policy Not Required. Must be consistent with PS 1-8. Identification of Risks & Impacts Process to screen & categorize risk. Process & implementation track record consistent with PS 1-8. Management Programme Process to identify & manage risks (including unanticipated risks). Process & track record for mitigating identified risk. Organizational Capacity & Competency Staff members able to categorize activities by risks. Clear roles & authority for implementation; includes Senior Management. Monitoring & Review Monitoring for unforeseen impacts or risks. Process for & track record of monitoring mitigation actions; includes Senior Management. External Communications System to register, assess, respond to, and track stakeholder communication.

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

T

  • mainstream gender into its decision making and project/programme proposals the GCF adopted and

implements its Gender Policy and GCF current Gender Action Plan which includes:

» Gender equality + equity + inclusiveness » Accountability for gender and climate change results and impacts » Gender-sensitive competencies throughout GCF’s institutional framework—skills, knowledge and behaviors acquired from training and experience that enable GCF Secretariat staff members to apply a gender-lens throughout their work; and » Equitable resource allocation—so that women and men benefit equitably from GCF’s adaptation and mitigation activities.

Section VII: Gender

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

1) Indicate how they mainstream gender considerations in the organization and at project/program level. 2) Demonstrate how their own policies and procedures are consistent with the following GCF gender commitments: » Understand the sociocultural factors underlying climate change-exacerbated gender inequality, and the potential contribution of women and men to societal changes in order to build resilience and the ability to address, climate change. » Adopt strategies, methods and tools to promote gender equality and reduce gender disparities in its climate funding; and, » Measure the outcomes and impacts of its activities on women and men’s.

Section VII: Gender

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Applying for Accreditation

Wha hat you

  • u nee

need to

  • app

apply ly*

 Nomination Letter from NDA/focal point (for DAEs)  Obtain access to the GCF Online Accreditation System (OAS)  Complete and submit the Accreditation Application Form through OAS  Climate change projects/programmes portfolio  Prepare supporting docs (how the entity meets the GCF’s standards)  Accreditation application must be submitted in English, as well as relevant supporting

  • documentation. Not all documents, policies and procedures have to be translated to English.

This list is not exhaustive 39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

» Priority & commitment at all levels of the institution.

» Have an in-house accreditation team conformed of at least 2-3 persons to exclusively work on the GCF-AP with the support of

  • ther areas/departments (preferably someone with deep institutional knowledge).

» Provision to cover accreditation costs: applicable fee, translation of key docs & human resources (team/personnel) » Maintain institutional flexibility as the GCF is constantly incorporating/updating policies & guideline, time-consuming process and

requires great amount of evidence.

» Be organized and resourceful referencing the supporting documents, one same document can serve as supporting

document of another sections + signal page numbers where relevant information can be found.

» Make sure to identify and label “sensitive or classified documents” as CONFIDENTIAL before submitting them through the OAS.

Tips & recommendations

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

What's next?

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Nomination & Institutional Assessment Review & Decision Final validation & Legal Arrangements

Stage I Stage II Stage III

FAO support – Direct Access to Climate Finance

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

FAO/NDA accreditation support in North Macedonia

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

» Access funding to develop and implement CC-P/P » Support CC-commitments & enhance country ownership » Strengthening institutional framework (international best practices)

Benefits of getting accredited

44

The accreditation is barely the “tip of the iceberg”

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Which entities can participate?

45

SCOPE PE: Open en, , public lic and/ d/or

  • r priva

ivate e poten ential l DAEs

Interested in accessing GCF resources Wish to request an accreditation nomination letter from the NDA

45

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Thank you

Eva Rivera, International Accreditation Specialist Eva.RiveraDelCid@fao.org Igor Slavkoski, National Team Leader & Project Coordinator Igor.Slavkoski@fao.org