Remote Vegetation Clearance Solution for MPPEH Contaminated Terrain
06.14.2018 Chris ten Braak
Remote Vegetation Clearance Solution for MPPEH Contaminated Terrain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Remote Vegetation Clearance Solution for MPPEH Contaminated Terrain Chris ten Braak 06.14.2018 Parsons Required Task PROBLEM : S : Site d draina nage d ditche hes w were o overgrown w n with v h vegetation, w n, whi hich h
06.14.2018 Chris ten Braak
2
: Site d draina nage d ditche hes w were o
n with v h vegetation, w n, whi hich h caused d ditche hes t to o
low w with w h water a and nd b become me i imp mpassable le; t ; the he property c y custodian c n could ld no not s safely ke ly keep d ditche hes c cutback a k and nd ma maint ntaine ned due t to p presenc nce o
muni nitions ns
: Parsons ns t taske ked w with s h surface M MPPEH r remo moval a l and nd v vegetation n remo moval ( l (to i inc nclu lude s subsurface r remo moval o l of r root b balls lls f for b brush a h and nd s sma mall ll trees) trees)
:
Due t to t thi hick v k vegetation, b n, brush, a h, and nd p presenc nce o
muni nitions ns, c , could ld no not safely c ly cond nduct s stand ndard hu huma man-o n-operated v vegetation c n cle learanc nce
a w way t y to s safely c ly cle lear b brush s h so mu muni nitions ns c could ld b be r remo moved a and nd ditche hes w were c cle leared o
debris
3
Road d dama mage c caused b by y ine neffective d draina nage Muni nitions ns e enc ncount ntered during ng b brush r h remo moval l
4
Roadside d draina nage d ditch h fille lled i in w n with S h Sweet Gu Gum m sapli ling ngs ( (no note s stand nding ng water a and nd i impeded f flo low) Enc ncroachme hment nt o
bushe
. If unc nche hecked, w , will c ll cont ntinu nue t to “creep” t towards t the he r road (no note s stand nding ng w water)
5
vegetation and munitions in MPPEH contaminated drainage ditches
Climber
encountered
6
How to Perform Vegetation Removal in MPPEH Contaminated Areas
Surface clearance ahead of vegetation removal is challenging in thick vegetation
potential item
an option
determined to be the safest option
7
Heavy E y Equipme ment nt S Subcont ntractor
Ski kid S Steer w with R h Remo mote C Conf nfiguration n
Green C n Cli limb mber L LV600 b by M y MDB DB
Image From Green Climber web site
Task: : Remove vegetation and brush (up to 2” thick) from ditches with varying degrees of slope (0 - 60%) and grub 2-3 inches below ground surface to remove brush and small tree roots
Pros: Have high performance equipment with professional operators
Cons: Cost was significantly higher, equipment could not handle the steeper slopes
Pros: Cost less than Option 1, Option to self perform Cons: Unresponsive to inquiries, remote configurations had to be purchased and retrofitted separately, could not handle steeper slopes
Pros: Lowest cost, responsive to inquiries, extremely versatile machine that can handle the steep slopes Cons: Relatively unknown machine at time of consideration
8
environments since the driver is out of harms way (>k18 of 47 feet)
undercarriage tracks that together with its low center of gravity, allows Green Climber to work along 60° slopes in total safety.
work areas.
9 Image From Green Climber web site
Forestry H y Head ( ($4,5 ,500 p per mo mont nth) h)
up to 3” diameter.
conditions.
10
Stand ndard F Fla lail H l Head (inc
w/ma machi hine ne r rent ntal) l)
works well on thick grass, light to medium brush (up to 2” thick), and steep slopes
11
last S Shi hield ld
n
ndard F Fla lail l
y Head
the HFD of 450 ft – this meant the team had to be behind a blast shield
§ Built a blast shield on a trailer that could be towed behind a truck while operating. § The blast shield was constructed based on DDESB specifications for an unintentional
blast.
§ 1.5 inch A36 Steel Plate (6’ x 4’) § Two 3” thick plexiglass (18” x 24”) § 16’ trailer § Square and angle iron to build the
frame
§ Welding equipment and operator
12
Blast Shield Construction
13
Blast Shield Construction
14
Blast Shield Construction
Bla last s shi hield ld o
n traile ler Looki king ng t thr hrough 6 h 6” ple lexi-g
lass
15
Operation
Image From Green Climber web site Image From Green Climber web site
Cont ntrols ls
machine was delivered.
well labeled.
with the machine after the first day.
Maint ntena nanc nce
worn out.
diesel.
16
Standard Flail
Before After
17
Standard Flail
Before After
18
Forestry Head
Before After
19
n Distanc nce
n in M n Muddy C y Cond nditions ns
y Head Gr Grubbing ng i in M n Muddy C y Cond nditions ns
Fuel F l Filt lter
20
Operation Distance
lem:
§ The range of the remote control operational range was significantly reduced when
lution: n:
§ Add an external antennae to the top of the blast shield.
21
Operation in Muddy Conditions
lem:
§ With the Green Climber have such a wide base and tracks,
we thought it would have little difficulty with muddy conditions but on steeper slopes the unit would slide laterally and get stuck in the bottom of the ditch
lution: n:
§ As the operators gained experience, they learned what the
Green Climber could and could not handle; also extending tracks out an additional 16-inches extra helped.
§ Green Climber does have a handy tow hook on the back to
help get it out when it is stuck
22
Forestry Head Grubbing in the Mud
lem:
§ The forestry head did not excel in muddy conditions; it would beat down the mud and
smear up the terrain more than grubbing it and removing roots
lution: n:
§ As operators gained experience, they learned when ground was too wet to use the
forestry head
23
Exposed Fuel Filter
lem:
§ The location of the fuel filter left it exposed to branches and sticks; one filter was
punctured and caused a production delay
lution: n:
§ Our team created a shield to protect fuel filter; Green Climber working on an
engineering solution
24
25