Reducing Nutrient-Algal Biomass Relationship Uncertainty Through - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reducing nutrient algal biomass relationship uncertainty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reducing Nutrient-Algal Biomass Relationship Uncertainty Through - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reducing Nutrient-Algal Biomass Relationship Uncertainty Through Mechanistic Modeling Thomas W. Gallagher 201 529 5151 www.hydroqual.com Presentation Overview Presentation Overview Empirical Relationships between Algae and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

201• 529 • 5151 www.hydroqual.com

Reducing Nutrient-Algal Biomass Relationship Uncertainty Through Mechanistic Modeling

Thomas W. Gallagher

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Overview Presentation Overview

Empirical Relationships between Algae and

Nutrients

Factors Affecting Benthic Algal Density Mechanistic Benthic Algae Models Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Chl-a vs. TP for EMAP Northeast Lakes Survey Chl-a vs. TP for EMAP Northeast Lakes Survey

Chl-a=15 ug/L

TP=16 TP=64

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Total Phosphorus Vs. River Chlorophyll

(From Van Nieuwenhuyse, E. E. and Jones, J. R., 1996)

Total Phosphorus Vs. River Chlorophyll

(From Van Nieuwenhuyse, E. E. and Jones, J. R., 1996)

Chl-a=30 ug/L TP=60 ug/L TP=600 ug/L

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Total Phosphorus Vs. Benthic Chlorophyll-a

(From Dodds. W. K., Smith, V. H., and Lohman, K., 2006)

Total Phosphorus Vs. Benthic Chlorophyll-a

(From Dodds. W. K., Smith, V. H., and Lohman, K., 2006)

TP=20 ug/L TP=500 ug/L

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Empirical Relationships Uncertainty Empirical Relationships Uncertainty

Empirical Relationship Waterbody Type Approximate Factor of Uncertainty Near Potential Endpoints TP vs. Suspended Chl'a TP vs. Suspended Chl'a TP vs. Benthic Chl'a TP vs. EPT Lakes Rivers Rivers Rivers 4 to 1 10 to 1 25 to 1 No Relationship

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Factors Affecting Benthic Algal Density Factors Affecting Benthic Algal Density

Light Hydrology Grazer Density Velocity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Responses of Periphyton to Light and Hydrology Responses of Periphyton to Light and Hydrology

(From T.D. Mosisch et al., 2001) (From Barry J. F. Biggs, 2000)

Effect of Light Effect of Hydrology

slide-9
SLIDE 9

(From Eugene B. Welch et al., 1992) (From Eugene B. Welch et al., 1988)

Effect of Grazer Abundance Effect of Velocity

Responses of Periphyton to Grazers and Velocity Responses of Periphyton to Grazers and Velocity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Models with Periphyton Subroutines Models with Periphyton Subroutines

QUAL2K* WASP* AQUATOX* CE-QUAL-W2 HydroQual Periphyton Model

* EPA Supported

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Jackson River Periphyton Model Jackson River Periphyton Model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Calculated Periphyton Biomass Sensitivity to Light, Nutrients, and Grazing Calculated Periphyton Biomass Sensitivity to Light, Nutrients, and Grazing

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusions Conclusions

Regression equations relating nutrients to algal biomass

may sometimes be reasonable for lakes but are far too uncertain for rivers.

Mechanistic models are available to relate nutrients to

algal biomass (suspended and benthic) and response variables such as DO, pH, and transparency for lakes and rivers.

Mechanistic models have the significant advantage of

evaluating other mitigation alternatives in addition to nutrient control such as riparian vegetation restoration, flow modification, and streambank restoration.