Reconnecting Youth to Success Mayor Pedro E. Segarra WELCOME 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reconnecting youth to success
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reconnecting Youth to Success Mayor Pedro E. Segarra WELCOME 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Collaborative Meeting December 12, 2013 Reconnecting Youth to Success Mayor Pedro E. Segarra WELCOME 2 Video ASPEN OYN CONVENING 3 Kim Oliver PROGRESS TO DATE 4 Hartford Aspen OYN Team 5 Key Team Take-Aways Roles and models of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Reconnecting Youth to Success

Collaborative Meeting December 12, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WELCOME

Mayor Pedro E. Segarra

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ASPEN OYN CONVENING

Video

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PROGRESS TO DATE

Kim Oliver

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hartford Aspen OYN Team

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Key Team Take-Aways

  • Roles and models of youth leadership
  • Core competencies for front-line staff
  • Resolving barriers outside of education
  • Supporting families of OY

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Short-term

  • Youth

– Gain new career/ educational readiness competencies to attain post-secondary credentials/diploma and/or a job

Long-term

  • Youth

– Reconnect to education and employment – Gain credentials

  • Collaborative/System

– Develop and/or expands 3 effective pathways to education and employment success for opportunity youth – Resolve system barriers – Enable increased adoption, replication, and the scaling up

  • f these approaches

Hartford’s Shared Outcomes

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Collaborate for Impact

  • Build public will
  • Include representatives from key sectors

(education, youth development, workforce, juvenile justice, behavioral health, youth, employers, etc.)

  • Include active participation by opportunity

youth

  • Write a comprehensive implementation

plan

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Formalize Youth Leadership

  • Establish youth leadership group
  • Target sub-populations

– Justice-involved – Single Parents – DCF/Foster-Care

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Use RBA framework
  • Share data among key

partners

  • Implement data system
  • Dan Garewski, CWP
  • Vicki Gallon Clark, BHCA
  • Scott Gaul, HFPG
  • Alissa Johnston, CWP
  • Sean Seepersad, OPP
  • Kimberly Williams-Rivera,

OPP

Use Data

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

At least 4 year college , 26.2%

College, but no 4 year degree, 10.2%

HS diploma, 39.9% Less than high school, 23.7%

Hartford Area Jobs

  • 1
  • 1.9

2.6

  • 2.5
  • 2
  • 1.5
  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Hartford CT US

Jobs

11

Source: Current Employment Statistic (CES), U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies.

Connecticut was among the five worst performer states from 2001 Q1 to 2013 Q2.

Source: BLS, Education and training categories by detailed occupation, 2010

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

HS Students HS Dropouts HS Diploma/GED 13-15 Years

  • f College

Bachelor's or Higher

Hartford Area

1999/00 2006/07 2012/13

HS Diploma or Higher

Education-Employment Ratio

12

Source: Monthly CPS, January 2006 through December 2007 and January 2012 through October 2013, public use files, U.S. Census Bureau, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University. Note: East/West Hartford Metro area definition was changed in 2005. For this reason CPS data for this area before 2005 are not comparable.

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

HS Students HS Dropouts HS Diploma/GED 13-15 Years

  • f College

Bachelor's or Higher

Connecticut

1999/00 2006/07 2012/13

Source: Monthly CPS, January 1999 through December 2000, January 2006 through December 2007, and January 2012 through October 2013, public use files, U.S. Census Bureau, Tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Job Readiness

(18 – 24 year olds) 13 34.2 27.6 38.2 50.5 28.2 21.3 10 20 30 40 50 60 Job Ready Almost Job Ready Not Job Ready Hartford Connecticut

  • Job ready

– High school diploma – Working – Not justice involved

  • Almost job ready

– No high school diploma – High school diploma but not in school or working – Not justice involved

  • Not job ready

– No high school diploma – No previous work experience – Justice involved

Source: 2000 Decennial Census of Population and Housing and 2010 and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Foreign Immigration

35.5 37.4 29.3 28.5 13.5 16 14.1 13 11.6 13.5 12.5 10.5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Foreign-Born Share (2000 Total) Foreign-Born Share (2010/11 Total) Foreign-Born Share (2000 16-24) Foreign-Born Share (2010/11 16-24)

Hartford CT US

14

Source: 2000 Decennial Census of Population and Housing and 2010 and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

“…the odds of having low literacy skills (in the context of an assessment in English) are about ten times higher for foreign language immigrants from a disadvantaged background than for non-immigrants from advantaged backgrounds…”

OECD (2013), Time for the U.S. to Reskill?: What the Survey of Adult Skills Says, OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204904-en

slide-15
SLIDE 15

27.6% 6.3% 19.7% 33.3% 13.1%

HS Students HS Dropouts H.S. Diploma/GED 13-15 Years

  • f College

Bachelor's or Higher Degree

Hartford Area

Educational Attainment

(16 – 24 year olds in 2012/13)

15

Source: Monthly CPS, January 2012 through October 2013, public use files, U.S. Census Bureau, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University. Note: East/West Hartford consists of Hartford County, Middlesex County, and Tolland County.

27.9% 5.9% 20.4% 34.5% 11.3%

HS Students HS Dropouts H.S. Diploma/GED 13-15 Years

  • f College

Bachelor's or Higher Degree

Connecticut

slide-16
SLIDE 16

17.2 11.9 14.7

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Hartford CT US

Out-of-School and Out-of-Work

(16 – 24 year olds) 16

Source: 2010 and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

44.9 39.3 11.5 1.3 3

Hartford

<12 or 12, No HS Diploma HS Diploma/GED Some College, No Degree Associates Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's or Higher Degree

slide-17
SLIDE 17

6.9 25.1 64.6 3.3

Hartford

White Black Asian Hispanic Other

Out-of-School and Out-of-Work

Race/Ethnicity 17 42.4 19.6 2.0 32.2 3.8

Connecticut

45.1 22.4 2.5 25.4 4.5

U.S.

Source: 2010 and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

48.4 51.6

Hartford

Male Female

Out-of-School and Out-of-Work

Gender 18

57.7 42.3

Connecticut

53 47

U.S.

Source: 2010 and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

OSOW, 39.3% Not OSOW, 60.7%

Hartford

Out-of-School and Out-of-Work

Single Mothers (15 – 24 year olds) 19 OSOW, 29.7% Not OSOW, 70.3%

Connecticut

OSOW, 32.1% Not OSOW, 67.9%

U.S.

Source: 2009, 2010, and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

In Hartford, 29.6% of OSOW were single mothers versus 9.6% for those not OSOW. In CT, 16.6% of OSOW were single mothers versus 4.0% for those not OSOW. In U.S., 15.0% of OSOW were single mothers versus 4.7% for those not OSOW.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Out-of-School and Out-of-Work

Institutionalized, Native-born Males (16 – 24 year olds)

15.6 13.5 8.1 2.2 17.6 9.4 9.2 6.1 8.7

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 <12 or 12, No HS Diploma HS Graduate or GED Some College, No Degree Associate's Degree Bachelor or Higher Degree Connecticut U.S. 20

Source: 2009, 2010, and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

51.9 25.9 32.9 10 20 30 40 50 60

% OSOW Considered Poor

Hartford Connecticut U.S.

Poverty

21

Source: 2007 through 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University. Note: (1) Expected lifetime years in poverty/near poverty of are ignored for all students ages 18-to-22. Poor/near poor persons are those whose family incomes are below 125% of the poverty threshold defined by the government.

14 6.2 4.3 2.9 1.8 1.4 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

<12 or 12, No HS Diploma HS Graduate

  • r GED

Some College, No Degree Associate's Degree Bachelor's Higher Degree Master's or Higher Degree

Expected Years in Poverty for 18 – 64 year olds in CT

Source: 2010 and 2011 American Community Surveys, public use files, tabulations by Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lifetime Earnings

18 – 64 year olds (in thousands)

807 1,372 1,693 1,821 2,908 3,919

  • 500

1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 <12 or 12, No HS Diploma HS Graduate or GED Some College, No Degree Associate's Degree Bachelor's Higher Degree Master's or Higher Degree

Connecticut

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Support 100 youth complete their

pathway program

  • Complete asset mapping of

partner organizations and programs in the OY system

  • Enhance partnerships and

service agreements in selected pathways

  • Complete a gap analysis
  • Determine strategies to address

"at risk" youth

  • Strengthen supports for families
  • Anne Carr, Career Resources
  • Adrienne Cochrane, ULGH
  • Tiana Hercules, Project

Longevity

  • Alex Johnson, CWP
  • Judy McBride, HFPG
  • Iran Nozario, Peacebuilders
  • Sharon O'Meara, HFPG
  • Hector Rivera, OPP
  • John Shemo, MHA
  • Andy Tyskiewicz, CREC
  • Jane Williams, ConnSCU

Build Effective Pathways

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Build Effective Pathways

  • Enhance existing effective pathways and

programs for opportunity youth

  • Create effective pathways for opportunity

youth to succeed in school and careers

  • Build on-ramps to pathways
  • Provide supports within pathways

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Build Effective Pathways

  • Supports within pathways

– Case management – Literacy and/or numeracy education – Language/ESOL education – Behavioral/mental health services – Income supports – College bridge and/or college retention support

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Leverage Resources

  • Resource development

– Secure $500,000 Aspen OYIF grant for implementation – Secure $500,000 in matching funds for implementation plan

  • Align existing resources

– Align $700,000 in WIA funds to support implementation plan – Identify and leverage existing youth programs and services to the plan

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

JFF Site Visit

12/16 & 12/17

  • Two-day visit to each community
  • Two members of the Aspen/JFF team will visit each

community

  • Purpose

– Give feedback on our key assets, challenges, and potential next steps – Inform the content of Aspen OYN – Identify areas of need for technical assistance and possible strategies for securing it

  • Structure

– Collaborative members – Backbone organization and staff – Programs

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Develop Supportive Policies

  • Agree on top priorities for state and local

policy changes

  • Take specific actions to advocate for policy

change agenda

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

For More Information

  • Kimberly Oliver, MBA

Hartford Opportunity Youth Collaborative, Project Director Capital Workforce Partners One Union Place Hartford, CT 06103 Phone: 860.899.3474 Fax: 860.722.2486 E-mail: koliver@capitalworkforce.org

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

MAPPING YOUTH SERVICES

Dave Bechtel & Michael Nogelo

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

WRAP UP & FINAL COMMENTS

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Reconnecting Youth to Success

Collaborative Meeting December 12, 2013

slide-33
SLIDE 33

HARTFORD OPPORTUNITY YOUTH (OY) COLLABORATIVE

Data from Youth Focus Groups and Surveys December 12, 2013

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Learning More from OY

  • Focus groups with opportunity youth in 3

programs

  • CREC Construction (WIA Youth)
  • OPP-Asnuntuck Pre-Manufacturing
  • Blue Hills-Capital Community College program (WIA

Youth)

  • Surveys of youth in programs that primarily serve
  • pportunity youth
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Youth Focus Groups

  • 3 focus groups with a total of 37 youth
  • 14 youth signed up to learn more about

participating on the Hartford OY Committee

  • Youth provided feedback on an early draft of the

youth survey

  • Described their goals, what makes an effective

program, needed services, and ways to organize the Youth Committee

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Effective Programs

  • Programs as a second chance
  • Staff who are caring, empathetic, respectful,

motivating, devoted, determined, knowledgeable

  • A quicker path to career / college / good paying

job

  • Work experience / internships
  • Help with basic needs / transportation
  • Long term follow-up services
slide-37
SLIDE 37

I messed up in high

  • school. This was my

last chance. They listen and help you find a reason why you want to take the program. The teacher here encourages you. Even if you’re having a bad day and giving her a hard time, she’ll just ignore it and continue to encourage you. Staff listen and care about you. I want a program that sets you up to get a good job. It’s a short cut to a degree and job. We need

  • pportunities to get

things that strengthen your resume, like certificates. I’d like an orientation before you start that gives you a clear picture of what the program is.

Youth Voices

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Organizing a Youth Committee

  • Provide a variety of food
  • Central location / downtown
  • Bus tokens / help with transportation
  • No consensus on time (lunch, weekends,

evenings)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Youth Survey

  • Focused on programs that primarily serve OY
  • 269 youth completed surveys
  • Hartford Job Corps (84)
  • Opportunity High School (82)
  • Community Partners in Action (32)
  • OPP programs (28)
  • Blue Hills Civic Association, Peacebuilders, Hartford

Adult Education, CREC (8-10 for each)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Survey Limitations

  • Builds on youth meetings held in the spring, not

intended as research

  • Issues with data quality:
  • 31 youth (12%) did not check their current program

when asked what programs they have participated in [where known]

  • 49 youth (18%) checked more than 3 answers for the

two questions which asked for the TOP 3 choices

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Youth Respondents

  • Most (84%) were age 21 or younger
  • Nearly half (45%) were in high school, 21% in a

job training program, 13% in college, 12% in adult education program

  • Most (72%) did not have a job and were looking

for work

  • Most (61%) were living with parent(s) or

guardian(s)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

16 or younger 20 17 years old 45 18 years old 54 19 years old 36 20 years old 31 21 years old 41 22 or older, 40

Ages of Respondents

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Not in School 34 In High School 122 In GED or Adult Ed program 33 In Job Training / Tech School 56 In College 36

Education Status

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Do not have a job and looking for work 193 Do not have a job and NOT looking for work 16 Part-time job 47 Full-time job 8

Employment Status

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Parents / guardians 164 Job Corps housing 34 On own 29 Roomates or partner/spouse 27 Other, 16

Living Situation

slide-46
SLIDE 46

25 28 29 30 42 66 81 110

20 40 60 80 100 120

Blue Hills Civic Association (BHCA) Urban League The Village for Children & Families CREC YMCA Boys and Girls Club Hartford Job Corps Our Piece of the Pie (OPP)

Youth Participation in Programs (cited by 25+ youth)

Yellow Bar = Not Surveyed

slide-47
SLIDE 47

16 33 55 63 66 72 90 107 113 133 133

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Other responses (written) Evening and weekend hours Incentives for participation A conveinent location Program staff who listen to me Staff understand and can relate to me Program staff I can trust Being able to earn job-related certifications A comfortable space Program staff who care about me Being able to earn a GED or college credits

What Makes a Good Youth Program?

slide-48
SLIDE 48

What makes a good program?

Program Characteristics # Related Response Options % of Youth Selecting One or More Option Program staff 4 79% Space / location / hours / incentives 4 71% Credentials 2 67%

slide-49
SLIDE 49

32 35 39 41 54 57 65 65 69 101 111 198

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Help with health issues Community services / leadership… Help with child care Help with access to benefits Academic and career advising Help with transportation Social skills / etiquette training Help with housing Financial aid Work experience / job shadowing Academic support (classes, tutoring) Help finding a job

What Services Are Most Important to You?

slide-50
SLIDE 50

What services are most important?

Type of Service # Related Response Options % of Youth Selecting One or More Option Job services 2 87% Education services 3 66% Case management 5 59% Other (social skills, leadership) 2 33%

slide-51
SLIDE 51

What services are missing?

  • 67 responses to open-ended question
  • Sports, health and fitness, recreation (14)
  • Job-related services (12)
  • None / nothing missing (14)
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Overarching Themes

  • Jobs are the top priority
  • Youth value relationships with program staff
  • Youth recognize the need to earn credentials

(degrees, certificates) to secure jobs

  • Many youth recognize the need to learn “soft

skills” to secure jobs

  • Sports and recreation may be an avenue for re-

engaging youth or connecting youth to programs and supports

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Next Steps for Data Collection

  • Compile information on programs that serve a

substantial number of OY

  • Program descriptions
  • Services delivered directly and via referrals
  • Number of youth participating
  • Data collection to include:
  • Survey of program staff (10 responses to date)
  • Basic information on youth programs
  • Request: Program staff who have not completed

survey sign up for brief phone interviews