Questions around the environmental footprint of housing Philippe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

questions around the environmental footprint of housing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Questions around the environmental footprint of housing Philippe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Philippe Thalmann Questions around the environmental footprint of housing Philippe Thalmann EPFL Input for the SDSN Switzerland and NRP 73 Sustainable economy ' workshop: 'Sustainable construction & housing ' Philippe Thalmann


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Philippe Thalmann

Questions around the environmental footprint of housing

Philippe Thalmann

EPFL

Input for the SDSN Switzerland and NRP 73 ‘Sustainable economy' workshop: 'Sustainable construction & housing'

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Philippe Thalmann

IS HOUSING CONSTRUCTION NEEDED ANY MORE?

Question 1

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Philippe Thalmann

Population scenarios FSO 2020

  • Population growth is

expected to slow down (1/2 of today's rate in 2050 in Scenario A)

  • No more growth after

2040 (Scenario C)?

  • It depends essentially
  • n immigration

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Philippe Thalmann

Scenarios for households

  • More important for the housing stock is the number of households
  • Similar scenarios, with a slowdown in growth

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Philippe Thalmann

Ratio of population to total number of dwellings

5

1.89

  • The number of

persons per dwelling reached a floor

  • This means,

that the same population will NOT occupy more dwellings

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Philippe Thalmann

Scenarios for households by size

  • The new households will be very small households
  • If they could share dwellings, the need for new dwellings would rise much less

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Philippe Thalmann

Size of dwellings by construction period

7

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 <1920 1920-1929 1930-1939 1940-1949 1950-1959 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2009 2010-2020

Evolution of the surface of the dwellings m2/dwelling based on the construction year

ABZ SCHL SM

  • From 1945 until

about 2005, the surface of dwellings was rising

Source: data collected from the SHEF project partners

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Philippe Thalmann

Age of dwellings

  • 1/2 dwellings are
  • ver 50 years old
  • This shows a

potential for reconstruction …

  • r the lack of

reconstruction

8 Data: OFS je-f-09.03.00.14

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Philippe Thalmann

Numbers of dwellings built, transformed, demolished

9

Propres calculs à partir de OFS Tab. 9.1.1

  • Demolition-

reconstruction is nearly irrelevant

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Philippe Thalmann

Spending on new construction and existing dwellings

  • Spending on

existing dwellings (essentially for renovation) is still very low

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Philippe Thalmann

So, is housing construction needed any more?

  • The need for new dwellings is shrinking
  • The demand for second and third homes is only slightly

mitigating this, as is demolition-reconstruction

  • Households get smaller and smaller, while dwellings get

larger and larger

  • If this trend were reversed and the existing housing stock

used more efficiently, it could accommodate most of the population growth

  • More should be spent on improving the existing stock

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Philippe Thalmann

HOW SHOULD THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK BE IMPROVED?

Question 2

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Philippe Thalmann

Energy performance of housing stock

  • There are still

many energy inefficient buildings

  • They mostly

burn fossil energy

  • Low rate of

(energy) refurbishment (about 1%/year)

13

Distribution of housing energy reference area per energy efficiency class in 2015, depending on construction period

Source: estimation by Arzoyan, Oberpriller, Thalmann, Vielle (work in progress), using data from SFOE

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Philippe Thalmann

Price of heating oil

  • Heating oil is cheap despite rising CO2 tax

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Philippe Thalmann

The problems with energy refurbishment

  • At the current low price of heating oil, energy refurbishment costs

passed on to the tenant are not offset by his reduced energy bill

  • Split incentives: the owner determines the bulk of energy use; the

tenant pays the bulk of the energy bill

  • When rents did not follow the decrease in the reference interest

rate, they can not be raised after refurbishment

  • Energy refurbishment pays neither for owner, nor for tenant (hence

the Buildings Program and cantonal regulation)

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Philippe Thalmann

Other measures designed to improve the sustainability of housing

  • Who pays for

– the most energy efficient appliances in dwellings? – renewable electricity generation on buildings? – bio-diversity around the buildings and rooftop vegetation? – advanced waste sorting, composting, shared gardens? – for social infrastructure such as activity rooms, bicycle and car sharing, neighbourhood shops?

  • Maybe the solution is income diversity and burden sharing: tenants

who can pay more (for the sustainability) pay more

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Philippe Thalmann

Tenants' interest for sustainability

  • Sustainability

characteristics rank low among tenants' housing choice criteria

  • Only about 1/5 of the

tenants seem to care

  • This could change or

be changed

17

Survey conducted by SHEF team among the tenants of ABZ, SCHL and Mobiliar between September and November 2019. 968 answers

What are the tenants of ABZ, SCHL, Mobiliar looking for?

  • When invited to pick the 3 most important

characteristics of their ideal dwelling among 23, only 13% picked 'ecological (e.g. Minergie)'; the favourite picks were 'low rent', 'with balcony', 'green spaces', and 'quiet'

  • 45% know that their dwelling is better than

average energy wise (Minergie, renewable energy, etc.)

  • Of these 45%, 44% indicate that this
  • verperformance was a criterion for picking

their dwelling

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Philippe Thalmann

So, how should the existing housing stock be improved?

  • Under current conditions, energy refurbishments are difficult to

justify on economic grounds

  • So are most of the investments that make a building or

neighbourhood more sustainable

  • As the environmental footprint of housing, outside of energy, is

essentially proportional to the housing area, fewer m2 per inhabitant are a natural way to reduce it

  • May be a more holistic view is needed…

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Philippe Thalmann

HOW CAN LANDLORDS MAKE THEIR TENANTS' LIFE MORE SUSTAINABLE?

Question 3

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Philippe Thalmann

Total environmental footprint of housing

Tenants contribute to the environmental footprint of housing:

  • How they choose

a dwelling

  • How they use their

dwelling

  • What they do with

their non-rent money

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Philippe Thalmann

Carbon footprint of consumption, incl. housing

  • The carbon footprint of

inhabitants of densely populated municipalities is 2/3 of those of thinly populated municipalities

  • Transportation is as

important as housing as a source of CO2; food comes next

21

Froemelt, Andreas, René Buffat, and Stefanie Hellweg. "Machine learning based modeling of households: A regionalized bottom‐up approach to investigate consumption‐induced environmental impacts." Journal of Industrial Ecology (2019).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Philippe Thalmann

Induced consumption

  • When tenants need to spend

less for rent, they use a large part of these savings for travel, in particular air travel

  • This is especially true in

higher income segments

22

Froemelt, Andreas, Rhythima Shinde, and Stefanie Hellweg

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Philippe Thalmann

So, how can landlords make their tenants' life more sustainable?

  • Lowering rents could be bad for the environment !
  • If sustainability in the buildings raises rents, this doubles the

environmental gain !

  • Tenants could be induced to accept smaller dwellings through

lower rents, but that would again free more income for other spending…

  • Just as the environmental footprint of people depends on their

housing and many other choices they make, it cannot be reduced by measures in housing alone

23

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION