Quarter 1 2019-20 School Year Strategic Plan, District Score Card - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
quarter 1 2019 20 school year
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quarter 1 2019-20 School Year Strategic Plan, District Score Card - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 14, 2023 676 likes •1.39k views

Quarter 1 2019-20 School Year Strategic Plan, District Score Card and Academic Progress Report 1 Topic Slides Strategic Plan 3-4 Guiding Coalition & Pillar Champions 5-15 District Score Card Key 16 Student & Graduate Success

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quarter 1 2019-20 School Year

Strategic Plan, District Score Card and Academic Progress Report

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

Topic Slides Strategic Plan 3-4 Guiding Coalition & Pillar Champions 5-15 District Score Card Key 16 Student & Graduate Success Pillar 18-33 Passionate People Pillar 34-42 Partnerships with Families & Community Pillar 43-49 Efficient Systems & Equitable Resources Pillar 50-52 Student Attendance 54-60 Student Behavior 61-66 Student Course Passing 67-70

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan Progress Report

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Strategic Plan 2019-2024

Adopted by the Board of Education, July 10, 2019

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Guiding Coalition & Pillar Champions

Strategic Plan Progress Report

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Guiding Coalition

The Charge of the Guiding Coalition is to:  Shape and lead our work in Improvement Science;  Serve as facilitators and accelerators of change by embedding the six core principles of Improvement Science in our daily work;  Lead our change efforts by gaining the cooperation and support of stakeholders  Function as the steering committee for the Strategic Plan;  Check for connectedness and alignment of our district-wide actions to the vision, values, goals and pillars of the Strategic Plan; and  Provide comprehensive, quarterly reports of our progress on key measures toward meeting our goals.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pillar Champions

The Charge of the Pillar Champions is to:  Develop the plan for accelerated progress toward our goals;  Monitor effectiveness and progress toward our goals;  Increase participation and membership by engaging stakeholders in change efforts;  Identify actions to accelerate progress toward our goals; and  Report progress toward our goals specific to their pillar

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

District Scorecard

SCORECARDS MEASURE WHAT YOU TREASURE AND BRING YOUR VISION TO REALITY

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

District Score Card 2019-2020

slide-10
SLIDE 10

District Score Card 2019-2020

Measures adopted by the Board of Education, August 7, 2019

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

District Score Card 2019-2020

Measures adopted by the Board of Education, August 7, 2019

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

District Score Card 2019-2020

Measures adopted by the Board of Education, August 7, 2019

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

District Score Card 2019-2020

Measures adopted by the Board of Education, August 7, 2019

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

District Score Card 2019-2020

Measures adopted by the Board of Education, August 7, 2019

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Pillar Champions

Team Facilitators & Co-Facilitators

15

Student & Graduate Success

  • Dr. José Salgado
  • Ms. Diane Wilkinson

Passionate People

  • Ms. Christina Mahoney
  • Dr. Patrick Jean-Pierre

Partnerships with Families & Community

  • Ms. Andrea Tote-Freeman
  • Ms. Karen Corona

Efficient Systems & Equitable Resources

  • Ms. Kimberly Lewis
  • Dr. Aaron Bochniak
slide-16
SLIDE 16

District Scorecard & Stoplight Reporting Key

16

Major barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been encountered;

initiative is at-risk for not being achieved; major strategy adjustment required. Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results. Expected results for this measure are generally met, work is on track and expected to meet the established target set in the district scorecard.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

District Scorecard

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Student & Graduate Success

  • Dr. José Salgado
  • Ms. Diane Wilkinson

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Increase the PI for Grade 3 ELA

19

Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Metric: Grade 3 STAR Reading Sept 2019

20 114.69 77.94 150.79 145.54 115.52 82.99 107.65 92.74 120.31 158.59 80.33 141.21 110.06 88.18 121.3 141.86 88 138 138.71 95.83 98.48 139.1 57.89 147.14 91 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

District Average Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller

Performance Index

Metric: Grade 3 STAR Reading, September 2019

2018-2019 2019-2020 2019-20 End of Year Target

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Metric: Grade 3 ELA Interims October 2019

21 48.56 36.76 50.79 41.07 31.03 16.84 58.75 32.26 43.75 94.53 36.07 86.26 59.64 47.27 64.75 32.56 28 18 83.06 40 42.42 97.44 35.09 67.14 91 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

District Average Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller

Performance Index

Metric: Grade 3 ELA Interims, October 2019

2018-2019 2019-2020 2019-20 End of Year Target

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Metric: Grade 3 STAR Math Sept 2019

22 125.26 88.97 130.16 137.5 130.17 101.03 126.88 90.32 129.69 164.84 107.38 167.58 123.17 58.93 136.07 147.67 97 122 157.26 72.88 119.7 152.56 78.07 158.57 78.05 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

District Average Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller

Performance Index

Metric: Grade 3 STAR Math, September 2019

2018-2019 2019-2020 2019-20 End of Year Target

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Increase the %

  • f students

that graduate in 4 years

23

Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Increase the %

  • f students

that graduate in 4-years

24 63.0% 63.0% 70.2% 67.8% 65.7% 66.9% 68.1% 70.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Percentage of Students

% of Students that Graduate in 4-years

% of Students Target

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Increase the %

  • f students on

the path to college, career & life success

25

Expected results for this measure are generally met, work is on track and expected to meet the established target set in the district scorecard.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Increase the %

  • f students on

the path to college, career & life success

26 75.3% 78.8% 96.5% 90.2% 75.3% 79.3% 83.3% 88.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Percentage of Students School Year

Students on the Path to College, Career & Life Success

% of Students Target

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Decrease the % of students chronically absent (Gr 1-8)

27

Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Decrease the % of students chronically absent (Gr 1-8)

30.20% 27.30% 22.80% 1.95% 30.20% 29.12% 28.18% 21.00% 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Percentage of Students

Chronically Absent (≥ 10%) Students, Grades 1-8

% of Students Target

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Decrease the % of students chronically absent (Gr 9-12)

29

Major barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been encountered;

initiative is at-risk for not being achieved; major strategy adjustment required.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Decrease the % of students chronically absent (Gr 9-12)

43.30% 35.30% 34.30% 21.82% 43.30% 41.77% 40.24% 33.00% 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Percentage of Students

Chronically Absent (≥ 10%) Students, Grades 9-12

% of Students Target

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Student & Graduate Success

  • Dr. José Salgado
  • Ms. Diane Wilkinson

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Student & Graduate Success

  • Dr. José Salgado
  • Ms. Diane Wilkinson

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Passionate People

  • Ms. Christina Mahoney
  • Dr. Patrick Jean-Pierre

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Increase the %

  • f new faculty

from under- represented demographic groups

34

Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Increase the %

  • f new faculty

from under- represented demographic groups

35 3.45% 3.70% 5.17% 3.64% 12.96% 13.95% 6.90% 3.64% 3.70% 4.65% 24% 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020

% of New Faculty from Under-represented Demographic Groups

Asian Black Hispanic Target

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Decrease Percent of Chronically Absent Faculty

36

Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Decrease Percent of Chronically Absent Faculty

37 6.75% 7.52% 9.88% 1.69% 8.00% 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00% 18.00% 20.00% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Percentage of Faculty School Year

Pecentage of Chronically Absent Faculty

% of Faculty Target

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Decrease Percent of O&M Staff Absent 12+ Days

38

Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Decrease Percent of O&M Staff Absent 12+ Days

39 47.47% 59.60% 59.60% 15.15% 47.00% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Percentage of O&M Staff School Year

Percentage of Chronically Absent O&M Staff

% of Faculty Target

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Passionate People

  • Ms. Christina Mahoney
  • Dr. Patrick Jean-Pierre

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Passionate People

  • Ms. Christina Mahoney
  • Dr. Patrick Jean-Pierre

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Partnerships with Families & Community

  • Ms. Andrea Tote-Freeman
  • Ms. Karen Corona

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Increase # of Parents Engaging with IC Portal

43

Major barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been encountered;

initiative is at-risk for not being achieved; major strategy adjustment required.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Increase # of Parents Engaging with IC Portal

44 1355 2370 2556 2057 3250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 # od Parents

# Parent Portal Users

Number of Parent Portal Users Target

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Increase % of City Residents attending SCSD

45

Some barriers to implementation and/or

  • utcomes have been identified; with

adaptation/corrective actions the district will be able to achieve desired results.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Increase % of City Residents attending SCSD

46 87.70% 86.30% 86.40% 86.13% 86.90% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Percent of Resident Students

Percent of City Residents Attending SCSD

Percent of Students Target

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Partnerships with Families & Community

  • Ms. Andrea Tote-Freeman
  • Ms. Karen Corona

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Partnerships with Families & Community

  • Ms. Andrea Tote-Freeman
  • Ms. Karen Corona

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Efficient Systems & Equitable Resources

  • Ms. Kimberly Lewis
  • Dr. Aaron Bochniak

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

3 System-wide Processes

  • Creation of Computer Accounts
  • Progress Monitoring & RTI
  • Requisitions & Purchase Orders

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Attendance, Behavior & Course Passing

Quarter 1, 2019-2020

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Attendance

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Perfect Attendance

104 115 103 75 95 122 87 91 112 100 146 215 141 166 241 95 120 63 74 98 130 82 74 135 82 136 174 135 160 218 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Perfect Attendance - Quarter 1

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Absences 1-5 days

277 219 174 220 289 304 250 214 245 206 240 375 422 404 1150 243 239 210 219 284 263 257 221 250 209 281 426 444 405 1188 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Quarter 1 Student Absences, 1-5 Days

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Absences 6-10 days

53 39 16 35 76 47 76 62 24 50 51 64 111 90 470 56 43 30 33 62 43 67 52 31 53 29 87 125 100 386 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Quarter 1 Student Absences, 6-10 Days

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Absences 11-19 days

23 19 15 8 40 15 17 19 10 14 13 32 58 36 407 20 15 16 12 22 15 15 10 7 15 8 20 57 32 411 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Quarter 1 Student Absences, 11-19 Days

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Absences 20+ days

3 7 2 2 8 3 6 7 3 6 4 9 10 13 425 4 4 1 2 6 5 9 3 3 15 22 27 537 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Quarter 1 Student Absences, 20+ Days

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Relative Risk: Chronic Absenteeism

58

Definition: The risk of a subgroup being chronically absent compared to the risk of all

  • ther students being

chronically absent

Subgroup Risk Q1 2018-19 Risk Q1 2019-20 Hispanic 1.18 0.77 Asian 0.71 0.65 Black 1.16 1.29 White 1.02 1.26 2 or more 0.77 0.89 SWD 1.40 1.44 ELL 1.05 1.17

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Behavior

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60 198 952.5 1446.5 154.5 897 1437 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 ES MS HS Instructional Days School Building Level

Quarter 1 Instructional Days Lost (Cumulative) Due to Suspension

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61 9 1 4 1 14 11 7 4 1 45 87 55 199 5 1 3 1 17 3 20 12 6 66 60 22 294 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Quarter 1 Student Suspensions, 1-5 Days

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62 1 1 2 3 3 6 2 2 36 2 4 7 7 25 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Quarter 1 Student Suspensions, 6-9 Days

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

1 1 2 5 1 1 5 14 41

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Hamilton Howe Keane Lincoln M.L. King Paige Pleasant Valley Van Corlaer Woodlawn Yates Zoller Central Park MPMS OMS SCHS Number of Students

Quarter 1 Student Suspensions, 10+ Days

2018-19 Q1 2019-20 Q1

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Relative Risk: Student Suspensions

64

Definition: The risk of a student in a subgroup being suspended compared to the risk of all

  • ther students being

suspended

Subgroup Risk Q1 2018-19 Risk Q1 2019-20 Hispanic 0.84 1.11 Asian 0.23 0.19 Black 2.81 2.50 White 0.77 0.58 2 or more 0.41 0.84 SWD 2.49 1.90 ELL 0.55 0.57

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Course Passing

65

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

Course Passing

1 course 2 courses 3 or > courses School 18-19 Q1 19-20 Q1 18-19 Q1 19-20 Q1 18-19 Q1 19-20 Q1 Hamilton 75 46 73 44 85 66 Howe 41 60 23 20 62 36 Keane 31 32 17 24 42 53 Lincoln 56 44 36 40 64 48 M.L. King 78 85 56 48 78 43 Paige 68 47 42 35 70 71 Pleasant Valley 88 96 25 30 59 43 Van Corlaer 50 71 25 24 43 26 Woodlawn 46 67 23 27 56 68 Yates 68 58 56 40 81 69 Zoller 35 20 20 20 33 26 CPMS (6) 41 56 12 21 17 26 MPMS (6) 34 36 14 12 17 12 OMS (6) 41 70 18 22 20 20 Number of Students (K-6) Below Achievement for Grade Level Quarter 1 Report Card

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

Course Passing

School 1 course 2 courses 3 or > courses 18-19 Q1 19-20 Q1 IEs Q1 18-19 Q1 19-20 Q1 IEs Q1 18-19 Q1 19-20 Q1 IEs Q1 CPMS 72 76 37 27 34 6 28 43 1 MPMS 97 89 57 53 56 9 71 77 ONMS 54 86 59 34 34 10 37 31 1 SHS 470 493 37 272 286 2 548 666 SCLA 42 28 61 31 30 14 96 129 10 Number of Students (7-12) with Grade <65 Quarter 1 Report Card

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Relative Risk: Course Passing Grades 7-12

68

Definition: The risk of a subgroup not passing 3 or more courses compared to the risk of all

  • ther students not

passing 3 or more courses

Subgroup Risk Q1 2018-19 Risk Q1 2019-20 Hispanic 1.09 1.21 Asian 0.52 0.58 Black 1.57 1.48 White 0.88 0.81 2 or more 0.85 0.67 SWD 1.36 1.22 ELL 0.85 1.02

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Questions?

69