Quantitative Aspects of Screening Michael OReilly, MD, MPH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Quantitative Aspects of Screening Michael OReilly, MD, MPH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Quantitative Aspects of Screening Michael OReilly, MD, MPH Technical Advisor Field Epidemiology Training Program - Thailand Objectives Understand the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values Be able to calculate
Objectives
- Understand the concepts of sensitivity,
specificity, and predictive values
- Be able to calculate the testing
characteristics above
- Know what factors drive predictive values
Questions
- How do we evaluate the ability of a
test to “do what it’s supposed to do?”
- How well does it identify those who
have disease
- How well does it exclude those who
don’t have disease
Sensitivity Sensitivity
What is the definition?
a (true +) b (false +) c (false -) d (true -) Disease
+
- Test
+
Sensitivity Sensitivity
The likelihood of a person with disease having a positive test:
_a_ a + c
a (true +) b (false +) c (false -) d (true -) Disease
+
- Test
+
Sensitivity Sensitivity
This is a vertical property I mmutable Concerned only with individuals who have disease
117 48 33 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
117 48 33 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- Sens = ?
117 48 33 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- Sens =
117/150 = 78%
Sensitivity Sensitivity
I s it affected by prevalence? What happens if we double the number of individuals with flu in our study?
234 48 66 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- Sens =
234/300 = 78%
Specificity Specificity
What is the definition?
Specificity Specificity
The likelihood of a person without disease having a negative test:
_d_ d + b
a (true +) b (false +) c (false -) d (true -) Disease
+
- Test
+
Specificity Specificity
This is a vertical property I mmutable Concerned only with individuals who don’t have disease
117 48 33 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- Spec = ?
117 48 33 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- Spec =
102/150 = 67%
Relationship of Sensitivity and Relationship of Sensitivity and Specificity Specificity
How are these two characteristics related? Under ordinary circumstances, what happens to specificity if you increase sensitivity?
MI patients non MI patients
CK MB band
Sensitivity & Specificity: Establishing a Threshold Value
8.0
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 - specificity sensitivity
Sensitivity & Specificity are Inversely Related
MI patients non MI patients
CK MB band
Sensitivity & Specificity: Establishing a Threshold Value
8.0
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
MI patients non MI patients
CK MB band
Maximizing Sensitivity
4.0
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 - specificity sensitivity
Gains in Sensitivity mean losses in Specificity
MI patients non MI patients
CK MB band
Sensitivity & Specificity: Changing Threshold Values
12.0
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 - specificity sensitivity
Gains in Specificity mean losses in Sensitivity
Positive Predictive Value Positive Predictive Value
What is the definition?
Positive Predictive Value Positive Predictive Value
The likelihood of a person with positive test really having disease:
_a_ a + b
a (true +) b (false +) c (false -) d (true -) Disease
+
- Test
+
117 48 33 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- PPV = ?
117 48 33 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- PPV
=117/165 =71%
Positive Predictive Value Positive Predictive Value
I s it affected by prevalence? What happens if we double the number of individuals with flu in our study?
234 48 66 102 Influenza
+
- Rapid
Test
+
- PPV
= 234/282 = 83%
Positive Predictive Value Positive Predictive Value
This is a horizontal property Mutable Concerned both with individuals who have and don’t have disease
Positive Predictive Value: Example Positive Predictive Value: Example
You are offered a PSA test with sensitivity 90% and specificity 80% I n a cancer clinic population of 1,000 prevalence is 75% . What is PPV? I n an asymptomatic population of 1,000 prevalence is .5% . What is the PPV? Where do you use the test?
a b c d Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
a b c d Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
Prevalence: 75% 1,000 x .75 = 750 a + c = 750 750
a b c d Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
a + c = 750 d + b = 1,000 - 750 = 250 750 250
675
b
75
d Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
Sensitivity = .90 a = 750 x .90 =675 [c = 750 – 675] 750 250
675 50 75 200
Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
Specificity = .80 d = 250 x .80 =200 [b = 250 – 200] 750 250
675 50 75 200
Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
PPV = a/a+b a + b = 725 PPV = 675/725 = 93% 750 250
4.5 199 0.5 796
Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
a + b = 203.5 PPV = 2.2% 5 995
Positive Predictive Value: Positive Predictive Value: Comments Comments
Affected greatly by prevalence One other factor has a great impact: is it sensitivity or specificity?
PPV: I nfluence of sensitivity and PPV: I nfluence of sensitivity and specificity specificity
I n a general population of 1,000 prevalence
- f prostate cancer is .5%
PSA Laboratories, inc. has heard your criticisms and has made 2 new PSA tests:
- Super Sensitive PSA [sens= .98; spec= .80]
- Super Specific PSA [sens= .80; spec= .98]
Which test has the higher PPV?
4.9 199 0.1 796
Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
Super Sensitive Sens .98 Spec .80 PPV = 2.4% 5 995
4 19.9 1 975.1
Prostate Cancer
+
- PSA
Test
+
- Total = 1,000
Super Specific Sens .80 Spec .98 PPV = 16.7% 5 995
PPV: Summary PPV: Summary
Driven by specificity and prevalence Most powerful in settings of moderate disease prevalence
Can describe screening results more powerfully than sensitivity or specificity
A
(true +)
b
(false +)
C
(false -)
d
(true -) Disease highly prevalent
+
- Test
+
a (true +)
b
(false +) c (false -)
D
(true -) Test highly specific
+
- Test