QSIT QUALITY SYSTEM INSPECTION TECHNIQUE Robert L. Turocy May - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

qsit
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

QSIT QUALITY SYSTEM INSPECTION TECHNIQUE Robert L. Turocy May - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

QSIT QUALITY SYSTEM INSPECTION TECHNIQUE Robert L. Turocy May 6, 2002 WHAT SPECIFICALLY DO YOU WANT OR NEED TO KNOW ABOUT QSIT?? MANAGEMENT QUALITY & REGULATORY ENGINEERING PRODUCTION, - - - , SERVICE WHAT IS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

QSIT

  • QUALITY SYSTEM

INSPECTION TECHNIQUE

  • Robert L. Turocy May 6, 2002
slide-2
SLIDE 2

WHAT SPECIFICALLY DO YOU WANT OR NEED TO KNOW ABOUT QSIT??

MANAGEMENT QUALITY & REGULATORY ENGINEERING PRODUCTION, - - - , SERVICE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WHAT IS QSIT?

QSIT IS AN OPTIONAL FDA INSPECTION PROCESS QUALITY SYSTEM ORIENTED TOP DOWN VERSUS BOTTOM UP PRE-INSPECTION ACTIVITIES SAMPLING FOCUS ON MANAGEMENT

slide-4
SLIDE 4

QSIT PILOT INSPECTIONS FDA 483s

10 20 30 40 50 60 M C P D O

  • M = MGMT.

57

  • C = CAPA

50

  • P = PAPC

45

  • D = DESIGN

26

  • O = OTHER

22

slide-5
SLIDE 5

WHY DOES THE FDA USE QSIT?

QSIT IS FOCUSED, HARMONIZED, EFFICIENT, INCREASES COMPLIANCE, & MOST IMPORTANT, QSIT ASSISTS IN THE PROTECTING THE PUBLIC FROM UNSAFE MEDICAL DEVICES USED TO DETERMINE IF A MANUFACTURER’S QUALITY SYSTEM IS CONFORMING WITH REGULATIONS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WHO DEVELOPED QSIT?

FDA REENGINEERING EFFORT ASSISTED BY INDUSTRY, TRADE ASSOCIATIONS, AND CONSULTANTS FDLI FACILITATED MEETINGS, ETC.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HOW IS QSIT IMPLEMENTED?

LEVEL 1, (Abbreviated)

CAPA + 1 OTHER SUBSYSTEM

LEVEL 2, (Baseline)

MGMT CONTROLS, DESIGN CONTROLS, CAPA, PAPC, AND RETURN TO MGMT CONTROLS

LEVEL 3, (Compliance Follow-up to OFFICIAL ACTION INDICATED)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WHEN IS QSIT USED?

MANUFACTURER’S COMPLIANCE HISTORY IS THE MAJOR FACTOR RISK OF DEVICE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DOES QSIT WORK?

YES!!! PILOT INSPECTION RESULTS QSIT IS HARMONIZED WITH THE EU PROCESS OF INSPECTIONS QSIT REDUCED IN-PLANT TIME FROM APPROXIMATELY 67 HOURS TO 28 IN PLANT HOURS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

BREAK DOWN OF 28 HOURS

5 10 15 20 25 30 M D C P T

M = MGMT 4.2 D = DESIGN 5.2 C = CAPA 10.7 P = PAPC 8.1 T = TOTAL 28.2 6 IN-PLANT HOURS EQUALS 1 DAY

slide-11
SLIDE 11

QSIT DOES

REVIEW THE QUALITY SYSTEM VALIDATE “ESTABLISHED” REVIEW MANAGEMENT

slide-12
SLIDE 12

QSIT DOES NOT

ELIMINATE “FOR CAUSE” INSPECTIONS FIND AN INFINITE NUMBER OF PRODUCT PROBLEMS

slide-13
SLIDE 13

MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

QUALITY POLICY MANAGEMENT REVIEW INTERNAL QUALITY AUDIT QUALITY PLAN QUALITY SYSTEM PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE SUITABLITY & EFFECTIVENESS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY, & RESOURCES

slide-14
SLIDE 14

DESIGN CONTROLS

WHEN ARE DESIGN CONTROLS REVIEWED?

SUBMIT PDP? SUBMIT IRB? SUBMIT IDE? SUBMIT 510(K)? SUBMIT PMA? MARKET DEVICE?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DESIGN CONTROLS cont.

DC PROCEDURES DESIGN PLAN DESIGN INPUTS ACCEPTANCE CRETERIA DESIGN OUTPUTS DESIGN VERIFICATION DESIGN VALIDATION SW VALIDATION RISK ANALYSIS PRODUCTION UNIT VALIDATED DESIGN CHANGE CONTROL DESIGN REVIEWS DESIGN TRANSFER DESIGN HISTORY FILE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CORRECTIVE & PREVENTATIVE ACTION (CAPA)

CAPA PROCEDURES INFORMATION SOURCES IDENTIFIED INFORMATION ANALYZED COMPLETE, ACCURATE, & TIMELY INFORMATION STATISTICAL METHODS FAILURE ANALYSIS VERSUS RISK ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS APPROPRIATE CAPA TAKEN & DOCUMENTED SHARE INFORMATION – MANAGEMENT REVIEW

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PRODUCTION & PROCESS CONTROL (PAPC)

PAPC PROCEDURES CONTROLS & MONITORS DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS NON-CONFORMING ACTIONS EQUIPMENT ADJUSTMENT, CALIBRATION, & MAINTENANCE VALIDATION OF PROCESSES SW VALIDATION PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LINKAGES TO OTHER SUBSYSTEMS

MATERIAL CONTROLS RECORDS/DOCUMENTS/CHANGE CONTROLS FACILITY & EQUIPMENT CONTROLS

slide-19
SLIDE 19

MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTING (MDR) A SATELITE TO CAPA

MDR PROCEDURES MDR FILES ESTABLISHED MDR INFORMATION COMPLETE DEATHS, SI & SI, AND MALFUNCTIONS

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CORRECTIONS & REMOVALS (CAR) A SATELITE TO CAPA

CAR PROCEDURES CARs SUBMITTED CARs COMPLETED CAR FILE ESTABLISHED

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MEDICAL DEVICE TRACKING A SATELITE TO CAPA

  • FAILURE CAUSES ADVERSE HEALTH

CONSEQUENCES

  • OBLIGATION FOR TRACEABILITY
slide-22
SLIDE 22

SAMPLING

CONFIDENCE LIMIT OF (.99) MEANS THAT WE ACCEPT A 99%

PROBABILITY THAT NO MORE THAN 10% OF THE REMAINING CASES DO NOT MEET OUR EXPECTATION. THIS IS BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE FIND “O” BAD CASES OUT OF 51 SAMPLES. TABLE 2 BINOMIAL SAMPLING

190 161 107 .05 UCL F 90 73 51 .10 UCL E 21 OUT OF 1 OUT OF O OUT OF

slide-23
SLIDE 23

STERILIZATION PROCESS CONTROLS A SATELITE TO PAPC

STERILIZATION PROCEDURES PROCESS VALIDATED PROCESS CONTROLLED & MONITORED APPROPRIATE HANDLING OF NON- CONFORMANCES EQUIPMENT ADJUSTMENT, CALIBRATION, & MAINTENANCE SW VALIDATION PERSONNEL QUALIFIED & TRAINED

slide-24
SLIDE 24

QSIT REFERENCES

21 CFR 820, Preamble & Regulation ***QSIT HANDBOOK GUIDE CD ROM COMPUTER BASED TRAINING http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/cgmphome.h tml

  • INSP. DEVICE MFGRS. CP 7382.845
slide-25
SLIDE 25

XQSIT