1
Q3 2015 Earnings Review and Update
November 6, 2015
Q3 2015 Earnings Review and Update November 6, 2015 1 Forward - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Q3 2015 Earnings Review and Update November 6, 2015 1 Forward looking statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks,
1
November 6, 2015
2
This presentation contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed herein. Additional information concerning factors that could affect the Company’s actual results is included in the Company’s filings with securities regulators. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements except as required by securities legislation. All figures are in US dollars, unless otherwise noted. While rounding may occur in performance numbers for presentation purposes, percent change figures are calculated using full, unrounded numbers.
2
4
Reported - % Growth Organic - % Growth
Versus Q3 2014 Versus Q3 2014
GAP 1% 9% Revenue 7% 16% Operating Income 47% 51% Diluted Adjusted EPS
(Q3 2014 adjusting items)
41% n/a Diluted EPS 118% n/a Operating Free Cash Flow
(12 month rolling)
75% n/a RONA
(12 month rolling, excluding term loan reclass)
826 bps n/a
Strong growth compared to Q3 2014, both on a constant currency (organic) basis and a reported basis
Foreign exchange had an impact on some operating lines
4
5
5
Edmonton, Alberta: September 9 – 11, 2015
LARGEST % OF US BUYER PARTICIPATION IN EDMONTON EVER
Houston, Texas: August 26 – 27, 2015
Dubai, UAE: September 8 – 9, 2015
Fort Worth, Texas: July 22 – 23, 2015
6
6
Salt Lake City, Utah: September 29 – 30, 2015
strength of our logistical capabilities
Fort Worth, Texas: September 23 – 24, 2015
the auction site
Polotitlan, Mexico: September 11, 2015
Donington Park, UK: July 14, 2015
7
7
Q3 Auction volumes (Lot count) Q3 2015 Incremental Lots per Customer sector
Total lots sold per quarter Lot growth per customer (seller) sector, compared to Q3 2014¹
16% increase in auction volume (lots sold) compared to Q3 last year;
Increase largely due to more assets from customers in the heavy construction sector
Number of Lots Lot growth per customer sector Growth of lots from customer sector Growth from prior Q2 ¹ Selected customer sectors. Does not include all sectors equipment came from.
56,000 68,000 69,000 73,000 85,000 21% 1% 6% 16% 0% 25% Q3 2011 Q3 2012 Q3 2013 Q3 2014 Q3 2015 214 66 241 2,284 1,196 5,082 15% 6% 86% 15% 32% 37% 0% 100%
8
8
Due to pricing and fee structures, RBA generates a higher revenue rate on the sale of small value items
Average GAP per lot declined 13% in Q3 2015 compared to Q3 2014
9
9
Pricing trends are asset/sector dependent; Some categories/regions performing far better than others
regional & national buyers in Canada and the US
bed trucks and specialty assets continue on same erosion factor as witnessed throughout Q2
differing with the quarter/region.
10
11.5% 9.6% 4.2% 3.6% 8.7% 10.4% 13.1% 12.1% 11.0% 5.0% 4.8% 8.7% 11.2% 12.1% 12.2% 10.3% 5.1% 4.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% New 1 Yr Old 2 Yrs Old 3 Yrs Old 4 Yrs Old 5 Yrs Old 6 Yrs Old 7 Yrs Old 8 Yrs Old 9 Yrs Old 10 Yrs Old
18.5% of GAP¹ 3-5 yrs old: 35.8% of GAP¹
¹ Industrial auctions only. Excludes equipment over 10+ years and equipment with unknown ages.
Age of Equipment sold at Ritchie Bros. Auctions¹
10
3-5 yrs old: 23.7% of GAP¹
6+ Yrs Old New to 1 yr Old
11
Revenue fluctuates considerably between quarters due to seasonality and the number of auctions held in each period. Revenue Rate fluctuations are due primarily to the performance of the Company’s underwritten contracts.
Quarterly revenue & revenue rate ($US millions)
11
2012 2013 2014
Revenue Rate Revenue
11-12% annual revenue rate range
2015
$92 $117 $102 $128 $106 $131 $99 $142 $102 $138 $116 $155 $109 11.5% 12.2% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
12
9% 7% 16% ‐9% 7%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Total Volume Rate Total Organic Growth FX Impact Total Growth
12
Breakdown of revenue growth, % attributable to item
Q3 2015 revenue compared to Q3 2014 revenue
~56% of the organic revenue growth was driven by increases in auction volumes ~44% was driven by revenue rate improvement
Changes in foreign exchange had a negative impact on reported revenue growth
13
13
transactions when good opportunities arise
uneconomical deals
14
Geographic breakdown of Q3 revenue
$US revenue
Q3 Revenue growth rates
$US reported growth; local currency
14 53% 25% 12% 10%
US Canada Europe Other 28%
7% 28% 12%
17%
35% US Canada Europe Other RBA - All Reported growth
15
$10 $22 $14 $30 $16 $30 $14 $39 $14 $33 $24 $46 $20 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
Tax rate relatively consistent with adjusted Q3 2014 rate
2012 2013 2014 2015
Quarterly Adjusted Net Earnings¹
($US millions)
15
40% growth from adjusted net earnings in year ago quarter
¹ Earnings attributable to Ritchie Bros. Incorporated. Excludes minority interest of Ritchie Bros. Financial Services.
16
16
EquipmentOne Revenue and EBITDA
($US millions)
EBITDA growth continues on a 4-quarter trailing basis EquipmentOne Revenue and EBITDA
($US millions)
$3.9 $0.5 ‐$2 ‐$1 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5
E1 Revenue E1 EBITDA 4 per. Mov. Avg. (E1 Revenue) 4 per. Mov. Avg. (E1 EBITDA)
Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Revenue 4 quarter average $ 3.2 $ 3.3 $ 3.4 $ 3.6 $ 3.7 Trailing 12 months $ 12.7 $ 13.2 $ 13.7 $ 14.2 $ 14.8 EBITDA 4 quarter average $ (0.6) $ (0.4) $ (0.0) $ 0.2 $ 0.5 Trailing 12 months $ (2.4) $ (1.6) $ (0.2) $ 0.8 $ 2.0
17
US sales team training now complete
approaches for EquipmentOne
17
Operational Results:
Recent Initiatives: Website enhancements generating results
since January; number of mobile visits up 47%
18 $31 $44
$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 Q3 2014 Q3 2015
RBFS has as extended their suite of services to now include unsecured Working Capital Loans to US Customers
use for non-equipment purchases, such as marketing, repairs and maintenance etc. RBFS funded loans
($US millions)
LOANS • LEASING • STRUCTURED FINANCE • DEALER SOLUTIONS
42% growth
18
19
19
– Related to this acquisition, we are also obligated to pay an additional amount not exceeding $4.7 million over a three-year period upon achievement of certain conditions
A strategically important acquisition; Allows RBA to build upon our existing online bidding technology
Ritchie Bros. group of companies:
20
20
During 2014, OnLine Ringman was used in the following sector events:
Wholesale whole car Construction Industrial Collectibles Fine Art Auto Auto Salvage Livestock Real Estate Other
During 2014, Auction Events in 26 countries used OnLine Ringman, including:
Australia, Canada, China, France, Finland, Hong Kong, Ireland, India, Japan, Mexico, Panama, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, the USA and the United Arab Emirates.
During 2014, Xcira’s live online bidding technology, OnLine Ringman, was used in more 23,750 auction events
Through these events, more than:
Ringman representing more than $61.7 Billion in sales
21
Q3 2015 YTD stats:
43% of GAP is from sales to online bidders
46% of lots sold are sold to online buyers
132,000+ assets were sold to online bidders at Ritchie Bros. auction in the first nine months of 2015
21
$1.3 billion of assets sold to online buyers at Ritchie Bros. during the first nine months of 2015
22
22
Ritchie Bros. Private Treaty
cannot be met by the unreserved auction model
market demand intelligence
and when items are sold and sales commissions are received
Currently marketing a package from Sweden
group of potential buyers
24
$673 $1,040 $865 $1,195 $849 $1,000 $845 $1,073 $790 $1,110 $855 $1,229 $887 $1,241 $956 $1,262 $895 $4,346 $4,353 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500 $5,000
$0 $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
24
12-months trailing GAP Quarterly GAP
Quarterly Gross Auction Proceeds
($US millions)
$4.35 Billion GAP on 12-month trailing basis
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
25
25
3 months trailing
($US Millions except for EPS, %)
Better / (Worse) GAP $894.5 $886.9 1% Revenues $109.3 $102.2 7% Revenue Rate 12.22% 11.53% 69 bps Operating Income $29.1 $19.8 47% Operating Income Margin 26.6% 19.4% 724 bps Diluted EPS $0.19 $0.09 118% Diluted Adjusted EPS $0.19 $0.13 41% Q3 2015 Income statement scorecard
26
Adjusted operating income (EBIT) and EBITDA margins On a 4-quarter moving average, RBA achieved the highest margins in years. Seasonality influences
and therefore revenue, flow-through and margins. Our highest margins are always generated in our largest quarters (Q2 and Q4).
26
35.9% 26.6% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 EBITDA Margin EBIT Margin 4 quarter moving average 4 quarter moving average
27
27
* Figures rounded to the million
$83M, 9%
$8M, 1%
25 50 75 100
Organic Growth FX effect Total Growth
in Millions
GAP and FX
$16M, 16 %
$7M, 7%
5 10 15 20
Organic Growth FX effect Total Growth
in Millions
Revenue and FX
$6M, 8%
‐5 5 10 15 20
Organic Growth FX effect Total Growth
in Millions
Expenses (DE, SG&A, D&A) and FX
$10M, 51%
$9M, 47%
5 10 15 20
Organic Growth FX effect Total Growth
in Millions
Operating Profit and FX
28
28
2015 reported revenue and SG&A growth 2015 Organic revenue and SG&A growth
Committed to keeping expense growth lower than revenue growth; Promoting the operating leverage inherent in our business model
($US millions, SG&A excluding depreciation and amortization)
24% 19% 16% 14% 15% 10% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Q1 Q2 Q3 Revenue - Organic SG&A 'Excluding Dep'n' -Organic 17% 10% 7% 6% 6%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Q1 Q2 Q3 Revenue - Reported SG&A 'Excluding Dep'n' - Reported
($US millions, SG&A excluding depreciation and amortization)
29
29
12 months trailing
($US Millions except for percent figures)
Better / (Worse) Operating free cash flow $250.6 $142.8 75% Working Capital Intensity
1166 bps Capex Intensity 4.2% 4.6% 40 bps RONA (Return on Net Assets) 26.5% 15.9% 1065 bps RONA excluding term loan reclassification 24.1% 15.9% 826 bps Debt / Adjusted EBITDA 0.5x 0.9x 0.4x Q3 2015 Balance sheet scorecard
30
Priority Discussion
Highly valued return of cash to shareholders
Offset dilution from management stock options through share buybacks
Accelerate top-line growth and leverage the model
Growth initiatives are a higher priority at this time
Only if better economic returns are not available
Consistently make use of cash on our balance sheet to facilitate underwritten transactions; The strength of our balance sheet is a competitive advantage.
(1) Priorities for cash utilization after operating CAPEX needs have been met.
30
32
32
Since 2005, the diversification of makes/types of equipment sold increased significantly:
Construction equipment still comprises the majority of what Ritchie Bros. sells
Case, Deere, Kobelco, Komatsu, New Holland, Volvo, + others
users, finance companies and rental companies
33 More than 85% Less than 15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
33
Ritchie Bros. works on behalf of equipment sellers; their interests are our key focus
Equipment from dealers/OEMs (of all makes/models) provide less than 15% of RBA GAP
internal sales forces to sell their product first
GAP from customer segment
% of total, 2015 YTD data Other Equipment consignors, predominantly End Users Dealers & manufacturers
34
34
quarter
Our Edmonton auction site has sold CA$633 million of equipment so far this year – already surpassing the prior site record for all of 2014.
Alberta buyers 51% Rest of Canada 32% US buyers 13% Other foreign buyers 4%
Buyers from Oct. 27 – 30 Edmonton Auction
Location of winning bidder
$496 $569 $633 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 2014 YTD Oct. 31 2014 Total 2015 YTD Oct. 31
Edmonton site GAP
(Canadian dollars, millions)
28% growth from same period last year
35
32% 8% 28% 30% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Alberta Texas 2014 Q3 YTD 2015 Q3 YTD
Regional GAP growth
(Local currency, Q3 2015 YTD growth vs. YTD 2014, Industrial auctions only)
Core sites in Alberta and Texas continue to demonstrate meaningful growth in 2015
growth platforms
many sectors
two years
improvement
Pleased with GAP growth achieved in the United States, which has been over 15% YTD
the GAP growth for Texas
35
36
Continue to be pleased with the GAP growth we’re experiencing in many regions
82% 72% 60% 54% 39% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Colorado Utah Minnesota California Ohio 229% 157% 15% 9% 9% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% France China United Arab Emirates Germany Italy 21% 33% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Select Regional GAP growth (Local currency, Q3 2015 YTD growth compared to YTD 2014)
36 US States International Canadian Provinces
37
Performance in first nine months of the year demonstrates our commitment to execution and our agility in leveraging market opportunities
Foreign exchange remains a headwind
37 Reported - % Growth Organic - % Growth
Versus First 9 months, 2014 Versus First 9 months, 2014
GAP
5%
12% Revenue
11%
19% Operating Income
36%
43% Diluted Adjusted EPS
34%
n/a Operating Free Cash Flow
(12 month rolling)
75%
n/a RONA
(12 month rolling)
1065bps
n/a RONA excluding effects of
term loan reclassification
826bps
n/a
40
Above model reflects our aspiration on how the model should work in the next 5 to 7 years
Performance Metric
High Single Digit to Low Double Digits
Mid Single Digit to High Single Digit
Will grow slower than revenues
50 bps +
High Single Digit to Low Double Digits
<10%
>100%
50 bps +
55% to 60%
<2.5X
(1) Includes Tuck In and Bolt On acquisitions (2) Variances may occur in certain years based on tax rate that is influenced by geographic revenue mix (3) Net Capital Spending as % of Revenue (4) Operating Free Cash Flow (5) Return on Net Assets
40