1
FROM CODE TO CURE
www.cgen.com
Q2 2017 Earnings Conference Call
August 2 ,2017
TM
COM701 Preclinical Data
Q2 2017 Earnings Conference Call COM701 Preclinical Data August 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
TM FROM CODE TO CURE Q2 2017 Earnings Conference Call COM701 Preclinical Data August 2 ,2017 www.cgen.com 1 COM701: LEAD CHECKPOINT INHIBITOR From computer prediction to functional activity in preclinical models COM701 is a high
1
FROM CODE TO CURE
www.cgen.com
August 2 ,2017
TM
COM701 Preclinical Data
2
Compugen and plays a unique role in the validated TIGIT axis
potential cancer immunotherapy treatment
1
From computer prediction to functional activity in preclinical models
IND FILING TARGETED FOR Q1 2018
3
h Ig G 4 C O M 7 0 1 T IG IT C O M 7 0 1 + T IG IT P D
1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0
T c e ll: C M V p p 6 5 s p e c ific C D 8
IFN (p g /m L )
+ 4 0 % + 9 8 % + 2 4 5 %
2
Anti-TIGIT combination Anti-PD1 combination
h I g G 4 C O M 7 1 + T I G I T C O M 7 1 + P D1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 IFN (p g /m L ) + 2 4 5 % + 1 0 4 % + 2 1 4 % + 3 3 5 %
Triple combination
COM701 IN VITRO EFFECTS MATCH PD1 INHIBITOR
4
+
Tumor/ APC
DNAM TIGIT PVRL2 PVR
PDL1
Tumor/ APC
T Cell
MULTI-PATHWAY BLOCKADE MAY BE REQUIRED IN CERTAIN PATIENT POPULATIONS
3
5
7 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 0 2 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
W ild -ty p e rIg G 2 b
D a y s p o s t-tu m o r im p la n ta tio n T u m o r v o lu m e (m m 3 )
D e a d D e a dWT
7 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 0 2 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
D a y s p o s t-tu m o r im p la n ta tio n T u m o r v o lu m e (m m 3 )
D e a dPVRIG-/-
*
5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 4 0 0 0
D a y s v o lu m e (m m
3)
W ild -ty p e P V R IG
Ganguly and Pardoll, Johns Hopkins Univ. MC38 model
4
Tumor growth in PVRIG-/- mice
A B
6
Ganguly and Pardoll, Johns Hopkins Univ. MC38 model
5
WT PVRIG KO PVRIG KO + anti-PD-L1 WT + anti-PD-L1
7 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 0 2 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 D a y s p o s t-tu m o r im p la n ta tio n T u m o r v o lu m e (m m 3) D e a d D e a d 7 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 0 2 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 D a y s p o s t-tu m o r im p la n ta tio n T u m o r v o lu m e (m m 3) D e a d 7 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 0 2 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0W ild -ty p e a n ti-P D L 1
D a y s p o s t-tu m o r im p la n ta tio n T u m o r v o lu m e (m m 3) 7 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 0 2 3 2 7 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 00 2 9 K O a n ti-P D L 1
D a y s p o s t-tu m o r im p la n ta tio n T u m o r v o lu m e (m m 3) D e a d7 1 0 1 3 1 6 2 0 2 3 2 7 1 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 D a y s p o s t-tu m o r im p la n ta tio n T u m o r v o lu m e (m m
3 ) W ild -ty p e rIg G 2 b W ild -ty p e a n ti-P D L 1 0 2 9 K O rIg G 2 b 0 2 9 K O a n ti-P D L 1WT = wild type KO = knockout
WT WT + anti-PD-L1 PVRIG KO PVRIG KO + anti-PD-L1
7
mIgG1+ rIgG2b αPD-L1+rIgG2b αPD-L1+AB 407
5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 0 1 5 0 0 1 7 5 0
D a y s V o lu m e m m
3
** *
2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 5 0 1 0 0
Tim e
*
Tumor growth Survival
CT26 syngeneic model
*p = 0 .0 4 4 ; T F = 4 /1 0 ***p = 0 .0 0 0 5 ; T G I= 5 6 %
5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 0 1 5 0 0 1 7 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 5 0
D a y s
D a y s
1 0 2 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 0 1 5 0 0 1 7 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 5 0
7
m m
3 m m
3
P e rc e n t s u rv iv a l
6
P
PD-L1+rlgG2b
P
PD-L1+Ab 407
8
Tumor growth; B16 model
B16-Db- gp100 model
8
TGI compared to WT + mIgG1 Day 11 Day 14 Day 18 WT+ aPVRIG 17% 13% 8% TIGIT-KO + mIgG1 17% 17% 13% TIGIT-KO + aPVRIG 63% 53% 49% * p < 0.05 ANOVA
5 1 0 1 5 2 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 0
D a y s
V o lu m e (m m
3) W T + a -m P V R IG T IG IT K O + m Ig G 1 T IG IT K O + a -m P V R IG W T + m Ig G 1
*
7
3 6 9 1 2 1 5 1 8 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0W T + m Ig G 1
D a y s V olu m e (m m 3) 3 6 9 1 2 1 5 1 8 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0W T + a P V R IG
D a y s V olu m e (m m 3) 3 6 9 1 2 1 5 1 8 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0T IG IT K O + m Ig G 1
D a y s V olu m e (m m 3) 3 6 9 1 2 1 5 1 8 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0T IG IT K O + a P V R IG
D a y s V olu m e (m m 3)WT + migG1 TIGIT KO + migG1 TIGIT KO + aPVRIG WT + aPVRIG
9
signs of monotherapy efficacy
efficacy; Rationale based on:
8