Public Safety Realignment and Reentry PREPARED BY: OFFICE OF REENTRY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

public safety realignment and reentry
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public Safety Realignment and Reentry PREPARED BY: OFFICE OF REENTRY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public Safety Realignment and Reentry PREPARED BY: OFFICE OF REENTRY SERVICES (ORS) REPORTING PERIOD Fi Fisca cal l Year r 2016 Quarter 1: Jul 2015 Sep 2015 Quarter 2: Oct 2015 Dec 2015 Quarter 3: Jan 2016 Mar 2016 Quarter 4: Apr


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Public Safety Realignment and Reentry

PREPARED BY: OFFICE OF REENTRY SERVICES (ORS)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

REPORTING PERIOD

This report discusses:

  • Realignment Population Demographics
  • Re-arrests Occurring within the Realignment Population
  • Reentry Service Linkage for AB109-funded Programs

Fi Fisca cal l Year r 2016

Quarter 1: Jul 2015 – Sep 2015 Quarter 2: Oct 2015 – Dec 2015 Quarter 3: Jan 2016 – Mar 2016 Quarter 4: Apr 2016 – Jun 2016

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PRCS: Post Release Community Supervision

Non-serious felons released from prison into county probation supervision instead of state parole.

Penal Code 1170(h): Felons sentenced to county jail

Individuals sentenced under 1170(h) effectively serve their felony sentence in jail instead of prison, and can receive two types of sentences:  Straight serve their entire sentence in jail custody and are released with no supervision.  Mandatory Supervision (often referred to as split/blended) spend part of their sentence in custody and serve their remaining time in the community under intensive probation supervision.

Realignment Populations

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Realignment Snapshot

OCTOBER 2011 – JUNE 2016

slide-5
SLIDE 5

AB109 RE-ENTRIES

Over 5,980 individuals had re-entered the community under Realignment as of June 30, 2016.

n = n = 5,982 5,982

OCT 2011 - JUN 2016

*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.

By Calendar Year

25 30 38 50 41 46 49 59 75 77 90 58 85 67 38 43 45 39 40 158 202 220 226 209 169 168 131 116 118 101 98 65 62 50 39 32 37 50 402 270 242 177 153 131 122 114 120 126 127 116 92 105 80 93 103 99 64

585 502 500 453 403 346 339 304 311 321 318 272 242 234 168 175 180 175 154

Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

1170(H) SPLIT/MS 1170(H) STRAIGHT PRCS Total

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Population Distribution Over Time

Between October 2011 and June 2016, first-time AB109 re-entries into the county have declined significantly across all 3 classifications. PRCS remains the most frequent type of AB109 reentry, however, distribution of the AB109 population by classification has fluctuated.

Distribution of Re-Entries

*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.

By Calendar Year

4% 6% 8% 11% 10% 13% 14% 19% 24% 24% 28% 21% 35% 29% 23% 25% 25% 22% 26% 27% 40% 44% 50% 52% 49% 50% 43% 37% 37% 32% 36% 27% 26% 30% 22% 18% 21% 32% 69% 54% 48% 39% 38% 38% 36% 38% 39% 39% 40% 43% 38% 45% 48% 53% 57% 57% 42%

QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

PRCS 1170(H) STRAIGHT 1170(H) SPLIT/MS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

REALIGNMENT DEMOGRAPHICS

The realignment population is majority Male, Hispanic, and High-Risk/Need

*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.

October 2011 - June 2016 Race/ ce/Ethni hnici city ty Gende nder Age e at Ree eentry ntry

84% 16% Male Female 2% 8% 13% 26% 51% Other Asian/Islander Black White Hispanic 18 - 24 13% 25 - 34 36% 35 - 44 27% 45 - 54 18% 55 - 64 5% 65+ 1%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

REALIGNMENT DEMOGRAPHICS

*Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.

October 2011 - June 2016

Initial Classification CAIS Risk Level

High 52% Low 7% Moderate 13% NA 28%

High Risk ~ 72%

17% 37% 46%

1170(H) SPLIT/MS 1170(H) STRAIGHT PRCS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Supervision Caseloads

AS OF JUNE 30, 2016

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PRCS & MS START DATES

These figures reflect anybody starting a new Realignment supervision grant with the Probation Department, including those who had reoffended and cycled back.

*Data for Probation caseloads and re-arrests were provided by the Probation department, from the SHARKS and CJIC databases.

FY16 MS PRCS Total Q1 71 113 184 Q2 79 125 204 Q3 84 126 210 Q4 86 94 176 Total 320 458 774

28 47 38 38 40 47 53 37 36 33 34 23 17 28 26 25 30 24 25 35 24 28 29 29 45 75 64 63 70 71 78 72 60 61 63 52 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRCS MS Total

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AB109 PROBATION CASELOAD

PRCS MS Total

Caseload 991 (68%) 469 (32%) 1,460

 There were 1,460 AB AB109 109 cl clien ents ts on

  • n Probation’s

Rea eali lign gnment casel eload  PRCS was 68 68% of

  • f the caseload, MS

MS was 32 32% of

  • f the

casel eload  69 69% of

  • f AB

AB109 109 cases es were acti tive, 31 31% had bench warrants  35 35% of

  • f PRCS cli

lien ents ts had bench warrants ts, compared to to 20 20% for

  • r MS

MS clien clients

640 (65%) 373 (80%) 1,460 (69%) 351 (35%) 96 (20%) 447 (31%)

PRCS MS Total

Active Bench Warrant

n = 1,008 n = 465 n = 1,473

*Data for Probation caseloads and re-arrests were provided by the Probation department, from the SHARKS and CJIC databases.

As of June e 30, 2016

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CUSTODIAL ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISION

CASP is an alternative supervision program established by the Sheriff’s Office. Eligible individuals sentenced under 1170(h) are released from jail early and serve the remainder of their sentence living in the community under close supervision. FY16

  • No. CASP Starts

Q1 28 Q2 23 Q3 32 Q4 45 Total 128

6 10 12 5 6 12 10 4 18 17 15 13

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CUSTODIAL ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISION

CASP Outcome No. % Successful Completion 103 58% Ongoing (TBD) 37 21% Program Failure 16 9% New Law Violation (NLV) - Felony 8 5% Drug/Alcohol Test Failure 8 5% Technical/other 4 2% Absconded** 1 1% Total 177 100%

Success 73% NLV 6% Other Failure 21% NLV = New Law Violation (Recidivism)

Known Outcomes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Re-Arrests

JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Re-Arrest Totals

During FY 2016:

AB109 Individuals Re-Arrested 1,785

  • No. of Rearrest Events

3,495

  • No. of Charges Issued

10,986

*Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.

755 1,326 4,375 312 598 2,289 718 1,571 4,322 INDIVIDUALS RE-ARRESTS CHARGES PRCS 1170 MS 1170 STRAIGHT

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Re-Arrest Charges by Offense Level

By Classification All AB109

1,337 3,099 2,744 778 1,026 1,003 1170 MS 1170 STRAIGHT PRCS

MISD FELONY

27%

2,807 28% 7,180 72%

25% 37% Charge Total with Supervision Violation Charges Removed = 9,987

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Re-Arrest Charges by Category

Charge Total with Supervision Violation Charges Removed = 9,987

*Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.

43% 17% 14% 8% 8% 5% 4% 3% DRUG/ALCOHOL PROPERTY CRIME OTHER MISC CHARGES OTH THEFT/FRAUD/FORGERY TRAFFIC CRIME WEAPONS FELONY AGAINST PEOPLE MISD AGAINST PEOPLE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1170 MS 1170 STRAIGHT PRCS ALL AB109 41% 43% 42% 43% 20% 17% 15% 17% 13% 14% 14% 14% 10% 9% 6% 8% 6% 7% 10% 8% 5% 4% 6% 5% 3% 4% 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3%

MISD AGAINST PEOPLE FELONY AGAINST PEOPLE WEAPONS CRIME TRAFFIC CRIME THEFT/FRAUD/FORGERY OTHER MISC CHARGES PROPERTY CRIMES DRUG/ALCOHOL

Charges by Category & Classification

n= 2,115 n= 4,125 n= 3,747 n= 9,987

Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Reentry Services

JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Probation Contracted Services

Data for Probation’s contracted VocEd and CBT service providers were provided by the Probation Department

Voca cati tiona

  • nal

l Educ ucatio ion n Serv rvices ices

PROVIDER REFERRED ENROLLED CC 29 68 CTC 440 103 Total 469 171

10 7 14 9 14

35 20 91 64 11 32

20 40 60 80 100 120

GED Construction Green Focus Vocational Education Job Ready Job Placement Focus for Work Employment Workshops Dom Violence Services

CC CTC 9 25 32 45 20 98 78

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Probation Contracted Services

Data for Probation’s contracted VocEd and CBT service providers were provided by the Probation Department

Co Cogni niti tive ve Be Beha havio viora ral l Th Thera rapy y (CB CBT) T)

 191 clients enrolled in CBT during the reporting period, July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016.  78 clients successfully completed the program for this reporting period.  The majority of the referrals originated from PRCS.  This program is reported by FCS as being at 70% capacity and the clients have been fairly consistent in their attendance  The program has demonstrated an 80% retention rate once the clients have completed their intake. However, it is reported by FCS a 50% completion rate due to a few factors such as, new jobs, housing issues, family issues,

  • r re-arrests.

 One of the main service gaps between initial referral and enrollment is making contact with clients in order to follow up with a referral to the program, many clients cannot be reached.  384 Clients successfully completed since the program's inception in September 2011.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Social Benefits Enrollment (SSA)

Qua uart rter erly ly Enr nroll llments nts

Data for social benefits applications and enrollments were provided by SSA, from the CalWIN database.

273 243 328 319 289 271 356 305 102 99 120 104 375 348 475 447 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 General Assistance Food Stamps (CF) Medi-Cal Any SSA Benefit

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mental Health Services

*Data for Mental Health Services were provided by the Behavioral Health Department from the Unicare database

Qu Quart rter erly ly En Enro roll llme ments nts

163 170 190 200 45 48 60 48 17 18 17 18 20 19 20 14 232 237 254 253 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Outpatient EPS Residential FQHC Any Service

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Substance Use Treatment Services

*Data for Substance Use Treatment Services were provided from Behavioral Health Department’s Unicare database

Qua uart rter erly ly SUTS TS Admis ission ions

166 321 114 521 169 138 102 350 101 113 55 237 76 135 71 243 Residential Outpatient Transitional Housing Any Service

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Reentry Clients Treated 1,057 Admissions (services) 1,684 AB109 Clients Identified 469 (44%) Admitted Once 686 (65%) Admitted Multiple Times 373 (35%)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

ORS Contracted Services

The Offic Office

  • f
  • f

Reentr Reentry Serv Services ices contracts with community-based

  • rganizations to provide education, employment, family reunification,

health & well-being, and legal services. AB 109 and non-AB 109 clients are linked to services based on referrals from the Reentry Resource Center partners.

* Data

a Source rces: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 2016 Education Services 7 12 3 22 Employment Services 32 40 21 20 113 Family Reunification Services 1 1 Health & Well-Being Services 16 10 16 42 Legal Services 8 14 3 8 33

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Faith-Based Re-Entry Services

The Fai Faith th-Based ased Reentr Reentry Col Colla laborat

  • rative

ive consists of four faith-based reentry centers which serve clients who are eligible for reentry services and partners with the SCC Reentry Resource Center to increase the county’s capacity for service-linkage. The FBRC offers a variety of wrap-around services, centered around case management and also provides one-touch referrals and services.

* Data

a Source rces: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative* Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 2016 Bible Way 7 21 8 12 48 Bridges of Hope 2 4 17 3 26 Good Samaritan 14 12 22 22 70 Mission Possible 12 10 16 14 52

slide-27
SLIDE 27

AB109 Rental Assistance Services

The Office of Supportive Housing’s (OSH) AB AB109 109 Re Renta ntal Assis Assistance tance Program rogram offers six months subsidized rent to AB109 clients, with

  • ne additional six-month renewal for a maximum of one year of

rental support.

* Data

a Source rces: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 AB 109 Clients Subsidized 20 17 19 18

  • Add. Family Members Subsidized

19 13 11 11 Average Monthly Subsidy $1,003 $831 $740 $660 Highest Monthly Subsidy $2,175 $2,175 $1,649 $1,649

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Emergency Housing Assistance

The Office of Supportive Housing’s Emergency Assistance Program offers a variety of one-time assistance to reentry clients; 3-month subsidy, back-rent payment, security/utility deposits, and motel vouchers. Each client may receive up to $2,000 in assistance.

* Data

a Source rces: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Given Assistance 19 12 15 16 AB 109 Individuals Assisted 5 2 7 7 Given Motel Vouchers 12 6 9 7 Given Rental Assistance 7 6 6 9 Total Assistance Allocated $13,671 $11,877 $13,041 $17,005 Average Motel Voucher $1,221 $1,294 $1,460 $1,560 Average Rental Assistance $427 $686 $475 $424

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Other Supportive Housing Services

The Prop Prop 36 36 and Pa Parolee rolee Special pecial Need Needs (P (PSN) N) programs house individuals released from prison through subsidized tenant-based rental assistance. Clients hold their own lease and pay part of the rent each

  • month. These programs also offer one-time assistance (OTA) for expenses similar to the EAP.

Rap apid id Re Re-Hou Housing ing for for Fa Fami milie ies and and Chil Children dren is a shelter program that houses families for up to 90 days at a family shelter while a case manager works with them locate permanent housing and tackle other

  • bstacles such as employment.

Communi unity ty Reint nteg egrati ration

  • n has three programs (North, Central, and South) which are housing programs

that utilize case management and partnerships between the County and the cities of Palo Alto, San Jose, Morgan Hill, and Gilroy. * Data

a Source rces: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Prop 36 1-YR 1 2 2 Parole Special Needs 2-YR 1 1 Parole Special Needs 1-time Rapid Re-Housing (families) 2 3 10 5 Community Reintegration North 12 5 1 Community Reintegration Central 29 1 Community Reintegration South 3 1 3 5

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Supportive Housing Totals

* Data

a Source rces: Contracted services from Office of Reentry Services, Office of Supportive Housing and Faith-Based Reentry Collaborative*

Program Start Date Total Referrals Total Housed AB109 RAP Oct 2012 325 *86 (137) EAP Feb 2014 276 247 RRHFC (Families) Jul 2014 73 30 P36 1-YR Jan 2014 16 14 P36 1-Time Jan 2014 30 16 PSN 2-YR Jul 2014 18 8 PSN 1-Time Jul 2014 5 3

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Reentry Center Clients

JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016

4,648 UNIQUE CLIENTS

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Classification at Intake  37% of clients were AB109  25% of clients were Formal Probation  38% of clients were “other” This suggests that just over 62% of visitors are eligible for screening/assessment by behavioral health

* Data

a Source rce: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Housing Status at Intake  27% of clients had permanent housing  50% of clients had temporary or transitional housing (THU, SLE, couch surfing, etc.)  23% had no housing (shelter, car, streets, etc.) This suggests that at least 73% of RRC clients have some level of need housing at intake, and about 1/5th need immediate housing assistance, as

  • nly 27% of clients report stable long-term housing at intake.

* Data

a Source rce: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*

slide-34
SLIDE 34

History of Homelessness  36% had never been homeless in the past  20% had been homeless once in the past  44% had been homeless more than once in the past These numbers suggest that about 64% of clients had some history of homelessness prior to their current situation at intake

* Data

a Source rce: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Employment at Intake  63% were unemployed and looking  18% were unemployed and not looking  11% had full time employment This suggests that at least 81% of RRC visitors need public benefits at intake, and that at least 63% of clients could benefit from employment services.

* Data

a Source rce: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*

slide-36
SLIDE 36

RRC Service Requests

Total Requests Individuals Requesting General Assistance 5,320 2,356 Food Stamps 4,550 2,306 Medical Mobile Unit 2,374 1,129 Drug/Alcohol Services 1,920 1,217 Healthcare 1,789 1,409 Housing 1,741 1,239 Peer Mentor Support 1,576 1,087 Clothing Assistance 1,518 1,071 ID Voucher 1,309 1,094 Employment 1,281 1,045

* Data

a Source rce: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*

slide-37
SLIDE 37

RRC Service Requests

Requested Screened Referred/ Linked Drug and Alcohol Services 401 284 233 Mental Health Services 249 126 99 Housing Services 338 127 127

* Data

a Source rce: ISD provided data from the IRTS database*

FY16 Q4 APRIL – JUNE 2016

slide-38
SLIDE 38

QUESTIONS