Public Procurement Law Update - New rules, same problems? Ruth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

public procurement law update new rules same problems
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public Procurement Law Update - New rules, same problems? Ruth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CIPS North East branch Public Procurement Law Update - New rules, same problems? Ruth Connorton and Tim Dennis 29 April 2015 Legal background EU directives Concession Directive 2014/23/EC Public directive 2014/24/EC Utilities


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ruth Connorton and Tim Dennis 29 April 2015

CIPS North East branch

Public Procurement Law Update

  • New rules, same problems?
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Legal background

  • EU directives
  • Concession Directive 2014/23/EC
  • Public directive 2014/24/EC
  • Utilities Directive 2014/25/EC
  • English law covers Wales and NI (separate Scottish Regs)
  • Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR)
  • Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended) still valid for

health service purchasing under NHS (Procurement, Patient Choice and Competition) (No 2) Regulations 2013 – health service purchasing by NHS England and CCGs and concessions

  • Case law
  • Guidance and PPNs
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Concessions Directive

  • Works/ services concessions over threshold (£4,322,012)
  • Must include transfer of operating risk covering demand/ supply or

both

  • All public, some utility provisions and defence
  • For social/ other services – contract notice and award notice only
  • Time limited - recoup investment and a return on capital
  • General process subject to Treaty principles
  • Minimum period for tenders 17 days
  • Award criteria in descending order of importance and potential to re-
  • rder where an unforeseen innovative solution with exceptional

functional performance arises

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PCR 2015

  • In force 26 February 2015
  • Procurements with contract notice on/after that date
  • Works, supplies, non “light touch” services
  • Existing thresholds apply
  • Light touch regime for social and other services - replaces

Part B

slide-5
SLIDE 5

“Social and other services”

  • Replaces Part B
  • Schedule 3 exclusive list of services by CPV code
  • £625,050 threshold
  • OJEU advertising: contract notice or PIN published “continuously”
  • Treaty principles apply - equal treatment and transparency
  • Significant flexibility in process, time limits to be reasonable, no

standstill required (?)

  • Contract award notice (can be published quarterly)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

New obligations – SME friendly?

  • Contracts Finder notices (above and below threshold)
  • All procurement documents must be available via the internet from

date of OJEU publication

  • Standard CCS PQQ mandated - England
  • No PQQ below goods & services threshold
  • Contracts Finder award notice (above and below threshold)
  • Contracts Finder notices for framework call-offs (any value)
  • Justification for not subdividing into lots
  • 30 day payment terms throughout supply chain and annual

reporting on compliance

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Available procedures

Procedure When? Open Restricted Freely available Innovation partnerships Where innovative need not freely available on the market Competitive dialogue Competitive procedure with negotiation Where needs:

  • adaptation of readily available solutions
  • design or innovative solutions
  • prior negotiation of contract needed
  • technical specification cannot be established

Negotiated procedure without prior publication Very limited grounds

Utilities free choice except negotiated without publication

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tendering processes

Open Restricted Negotiated Comp dialogue Innovation partnership Pre market engagement      Contract notice      PQQ x     ITT      Negotiation X X    Tender      Post selection negotiation X X X   Award      Further growth X X X X 

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Comp negotiation vs Comp dialogue

  • Competitive negotiation
  • Know needs and characteristics
  • Negotiate with all on basis of initial and subsequent tenders,

but not final tenders (runs like restricted)

  • Competitive dialogue
  • Know needs and requirements
  • Dialogue with all to identify solutions and means best suited to

satisfying needs, final tenders

  • Clarify, specify and optimise all tenders
  • Final negotiations to confirm commitments/ terms but not on

essential elements or to distort competition

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Innovation Partnerships

  • Must be able to identify a need for an innovative product, service or

works that cannot be met by the current market

  • “Innovation” …new or significantly improved… including…

production, building or construction processes, a new marketing method, or a new organisational method in business practices, workplace organisation or external relations including…helping to solve societal challenges or support the Europe 2012 [2020] strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth

  • One partner or several partners each conducting separate R&D
  • Negotiation permitted and must structure in successive phases: eg

R&D, prototype, manufacture, delivery

  • Must establish IP rights base to go to market
  • Value of delivery not disproportionate to value of investment for

development

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pre Market Engagement

  • Expressly permitted (and encouraged by Cabinet Office)
  • To prepare the procurement and inform the market of procurement

plans and requirements

  • Authority must take appropriate measures to ensure that

competition is not distorted

  • Can only exclude where there are no other means to ensure non-

distortion of competition

  • Must provide the tenderer with an opportunity to prove distortion of

competition will not result

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CCS Standard PQQ

  • Must use for all procurements (including light touch) if over

threshold

  • Core questions and additional modules
  • Must add your own evaluation methodology
  • “Reportable Deviations” cannot deviate from questions or question

wording unless justified and then must report to CCS within 30 days of making PQQ available to candidates – from 1 September 2015

  • Cannot use PQQ stage below goods & services threshold
  • Will be replaced by ESPD - European Single Procurement

Document

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PQQ grounds

  • Mandatory exclusion criteria (5 years)
  • Discretionary exclusion criteria (3 years)
  • Significant or persistent deficiencies under a prior public

contract which led to early termination, damages or comparable sanctions

  • Economic and financial standing
  • Minimum turnover (max 2x contract value unless exceptional)
  • Information on accounts (must state how scored)
  • Any minimum hurdles must be in contract notice or ITCI
  • Self cleansing/ declaration permissible
  • Continuing obligation throughout process
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Contract award criteria

  • Must award to “most economically advantageous tender”
  • On basis of price or cost – so can be price only
  • Or can include the best price/quality ratio
  • Price can include life cycle costing looking at acquisition,

maintenance, end of life costs, usage eg energy consumption

  • Quality criteria can take into account e.g.
  • Technical merit, social, environmental and innovative

characteristics

  • Qualifications and experience where significant impact on

contract performance

  • After sales service
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Frameworks

  • Methods of call off:
  • Single supplier framework – direct call off
  • Multi supplier framework – direct call off or mini-competition OR

mini-comp only

  • Must set out in framework agreement:
  • Objective criteria for deciding between direct call-off or mini

competition

  • How decision will be made if direct call off; and
  • Mini-competition award criteria
  • Must publish contract award information on Contracts Finder for

each call off contract

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Things not coming to market?

  • Continued in house provision
  • “Social and other services” no cross border interest (but still

should be some competition for value/ governance reasons)

  • Not considered/ illegal process
  • Direct award to a mutual
  • Direct award to an in house service
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Awards to mutual or social entities

  • Contracts for limited range of social/ other specific services

including surgical and medical hospital services, education

  • Can restrict award to types of organisation where
  • its objective is a public service mission
  • profits are reinvested or distributed to participants
  • management/ ownership is based on employee ownership/

participatory principles

  • haven’t awarded a contract for those services by that authority

in past 3 years

  • Limit of 3 years’ duration on the awarded contract
  • Competition amongst reserved bodies
slide-18
SLIDE 18

“In house” awards

  • Structural (Teckal)- award to a legal person governed by private or

public law

  • Control test - decisive influence over strategic objectives and

significant decisions (can be jointly exercised)

  • Activity test - 80% of the activities must be carried out for the

controlling authority

  • Capital – no direct private capital participation except required

non-controlling, non-blocking without decisive influence

  • Public to public co-operation (Hamburg)
  • Co-operate to deliver public services driven by goal of

achieving common objectives

  • Governed solely by public interest considerations
  • Perform on the open market less than 20% of activities
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Modification of contracts - allowed

  • Modification can occur without a new procurement arising where:
  • Contract clearly and unequivocally provides for the change and

it doesn’t affect overall nature

  • Additional provision not envisaged but a change of contractor

can’t be made due to interchangeability or interoperability issues or significant inconvenience/ substantial cost duplication and not >50% of contract value

  • Couldn’t be foreseen, doesn’t affect overall nature and not

>50% of contract value

  • Change of contractor due to merger, insolvency, acquisition etc
  • Change value doesn’t exceed the relevant threshold AND is

less than 10% of the original contract value (services) or 15%

  • f the contract value (works) – net cumulative value of changes
  • Not “substantial”
slide-20
SLIDE 20

What is “substantial” modification

  • Changes are substantial, and therefore give rise to a new

procurement, where it:

  • Renders the contract materially different in character to that
  • riginally concluded
  • Introduces conditions which if included originally would have

brought other bidders/ different winner

  • Changes the economic balance of the contract in favour of the

contractor in a manner not provided for initially

  • Extends the scope of the contract considerably or
  • A new contractor replaces the original contractor (except

insolvency, acquisition, re-organisation)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Reporting

  • Information on every contract/ framework agreement/ DPS
  • Authority details, the subject matter and value of the contract
  • Details of any shortlisting or de-selection and reasons;
  • Reasons for rejection of any abnormally low tenders
  • Winning bidder identity and reasons and if known any sub-

contracting levels and main sub-contractor identities

  • Justification for the choice of procedure – negotiated/ dialogue
  • Reasons for any decision not to make an award
  • Reasons why any non-electronic communication has been

used for tender submission

  • Any conflicts of interest detected and subsequent measures

taken

  • Send to Commission or Cabinet Office on request
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Documentation retention

  • Keep documentation for at least 3 years to "justify decisions taken

in all stages of the procurement procedure" such as on

  • Communications with bidders and potential bidders and internal

deliberations

  • Preparation of procurement documents
  • Any dialogue or negotiation
  • Selection and award of the contract
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Claims/ remedies

Pre contract award Post contract award Breach of duty Automatic suspension Damages Damages Ineffectiveness

  • illegal direct award
  • breach duty &

standstill

  • incorrect over

threshold framework call off Automatic Suspension Voiding of contract Damages Civil financial penalties Contract cancellation Voiding of contract Damages Civil financial penalties Contract cancellation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Issues relevant to litigation

  • Reporting requirements and record keeping
  • Document Retention
  • Discretionary exclusion criteria – persistent deficiencies under a

prior public contract – may result in more disputes between parties during contracts

  • Revised definition of “Economic Operator” – wider group of

potential claimants under PCR 2015?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What we tell bidders

  • Go fishing
  • Time is of the essence - act quickly
  • Use your contacts - “off the record” isn’t
  • Press the procuring body - debriefs
  • No stigma to challenging
  • Reasons/ issues can leak out more as you push to keep going
  • Get legal advice ASAP – don’t prejudice claim
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Current trends

  • Increasingly litigious area
  • Public Sector challenging Public Sector
  • Increasing claims in SOS services areas – stopping awards
  • Economics often driving challenges
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Phone a friend

Ruth Connorton Partner, Head of Procurement

T: 0191 404 4130 M: 07711 969 790 E: rconnorton@dacbeachcroft.com

Tim Dennis Senior Solicitor

T: 0191 404 4003 M: 07725 642701 E: tdennis@dacbeachcroft.com