public procurement law recent developments
play

Public procurement law recent developments Christopher Brown - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public procurement law recent developments Christopher Brown cbrown@matrixlaw.co.uk @CBrownMatrix Overview The reform agenda Recent CJEU developments Recent domestic litigation The reform agenda December 2011: Commission


  1. Public procurement law – recent developments Christopher Brown cbrown@matrixlaw.co.uk @CBrownMatrix

  2. Overview • The reform agenda • Recent CJEU developments • Recent domestic litigation

  3. The reform agenda • December 2011: Commission proposals for 3 new directives – utilities, procurement and concessions • Protracted legislative process • Political agreement reached in July 2013 • Today’s focus is on public sector directive; NB OJEU advertising of concessions contracts worth > € 5m • NB remedies directive remains in place

  4. The reform agenda • Most significant ‘innovations’: – More scope for using the negotiated procedure for non- “off the shelf” purchasing – Simplification of rules on Dynamic Purchasing Systems (no need to advertise call-offs) – “Innovation Partnerships” – Preliminary market consultation permitted – Abolition of Part A/Part B distinction (NB treatment of health/social care services etc) – Lighter regime for “sub - central” CAs

  5. The reform agenda – Reducing burden: supplier self-declarations; e- marketplaces expressly permitted; time limits – E-communication/e-procurement will be mandatory 4.5 years after directive is adopted – Grounds for exclusion – Ability to give CAs power to reserve award of certain contracts to mutuals/social enterprises – Assistance to SMEs encouraged (e.g t/o cap; division into lots) – Ability to take account of life-cycle costs

  6. The reform agenda • ‘Codifications’ of CJEU case law: – Material changes to contracts post-award: Pressetext – The Teckal in-house exception; NB • 80% figure • Public-public cooperation (Hamburg ; Azienda) – Relevance of experience (Lianakis); NB CA consent re replacement of staff – Principle of proportionality – Abnormally low tenders(Slovensko; cf Varney)

  7. The reform agenda • Adoption and implementation: – Directives likely to be adopted by early 2014 – MS will have 2 years to transpose – UK likely to transpose (“copy out”) ASAP; NB various issues left to Member States, e.g. • termination of contracts? • What to do about health, social and cultural services? • Legislate for mandatory exclusions? • Subcontracting? • NB review of thresholds within 3 years

  8. Recent CJEU judgments • Cases C-197 and 203/11Libert – Regional law regulating sale/lease of properties – Does a provision requiring property developers to provide social housing to public authorities give rise to a public works contract? – CJEU doubtful that a relevant contract existed: obligation is imposed by national law, w/o there being any agreement defining works/Ts&Cs – Not open to housing authority to choose developer – Some resemblance to s106 agreements

  9. Recent CJEU judgments • C-336/12 Manova: non-discrimination rule does not prevent CAs asking for certain docs that should have been included with tender • C-100/12 Fastweb: right to challenge award decisions by tenderers that do not themselves comply with all the (technical) requirements under the tender documentation

  10. Recent domestic litigation • Judgments on disclosure – Roche Diagnostics – Pearson Driving Assessments • Judgments on time limits (Uniplex; Sita) – Nationwide Gritting Services • Judgments lifting the prohibition on the contract being awarded – Lowry Bros Ltd v NI Water Ltd and Resource NI (NI) – Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (E&W) – Glasgow Rent Deposit and Support Scheme (Scot) – Clinical Solutions International (Scot) • Judgment on scope for expert evidence – BY Development Ltd & Ors v Covent Garden Market Authority • Continued use of JR: R (RB) and Nash

  11. =

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend