Psychological Test Dr. Sudip Chaudhuri M. Sc., M. Tech., Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

psychological test
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Psychological Test Dr. Sudip Chaudhuri M. Sc., M. Tech., Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Psychological Test Dr. Sudip Chaudhuri M. Sc., M. Tech., Ph.D. (Sc.) (SINP, Cal), M. Ed. M. Sc., M. Tech., Ph.D. (Sc.) (SINP, Cal), M. Ed. CSIR-UGC NET, WBCSC SLET, I.I.T. GATE Assistant Professor-Stage-3 / Reader Gandhi Centenary B.T.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Psychological Test

  • Dr. Sudip Chaudhuri
  • M. Sc., M. Tech., Ph.D. (Sc.) (SINP, Cal), M. Ed.
  • M. Sc., M. Tech., Ph.D. (Sc.) (SINP, Cal), M. Ed.

CSIR-UGC NET, WBCSC SLET, I.I.T. GATE

Assistant Professor-Stage-3 / Reader

Gandhi Centenary B.T. College, Habra, India,

Honorary Researcher, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata

chaudhurisudip@yahoo.co.in

slide-2
SLIDE 2

No modern politician was as ready to be criticized as Gandhi

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Rating Scale

 Rating scales record judgment or opinions

and indicates the degree or amount of different degrees of quality which are arranged along a line is the scale. For example: How good was the performance?

Excellent Very good Good Average Below average Poor Very poor

___|________|_______|_____|_________|_________|_____|____

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Attitude Scale

 Attitude scale is essential as it attempts to

minimise the difficulty of opinionnaire and questionnaire by defining the attitude in terms

  • f a single attitude object. All items, therefore,

may be constructed with graduations of may be constructed with graduations of favour or disfavour.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Characteristics of Attitude Scale

 It provides for quantitative measure on a

unidimensional scale of continuum.

 It uses statements from the extreme positive to

extreme negative position.

 It generally uses a five point scale as we have

discussed in rating scale.

 It could be standardised and norms are worked out.  It disguises the attitude object rather than directly  It disguises the attitude object rather than directly

asking about the attitude on the subject.

 Examples of Some Attitude Scale : Two popular

and useful methods of measuring attitudes indirectly, commonly used for research purposes are:

 Likert‘s method of summated ratings.  Thurstone Techniques of scaled values.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Likert‘s method of summated ratings

 The Likert scale assigns a scale value to each of the five

  • responses. All favourable statements are scored from maximum

to minimum i. e. from a score of 5 to a score of one or 5 for strongly agree and so on 1 for strongly disagree.

 The negative statement or statement apposing the proposition

would be scored in the opposite order . e. from a score of 1 to a score of 5 or 1 for strongly agree and so on 5 for strongly

  • disagree. The total of these scores on all the items measures a

respondent‘s favourableness towards the subject in question. It a respondent‘s favourableness towards the subject in question. It a scale consists of 30 items, Say, the following score values will be

  • f interest:

30x5=150 Most favourable response possible 30x3= 90 A neutral attitude 30x1= 30 Most unfavourable attitude

 It is thus known as a method of summated ratings. The summed

up score of any individual would fall between 30 and 150. Scores above 50 will indicate a favourable and scores below go an unfavourable attitude.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Thurstone Technique

 Thurstone Technique is used when attitude is

accepted as a uni-dimensional linear continuum

 The technique is also known as the technique equal

appearing intervals

 Tabulations are made which indicate the number of

judges who placed each item in each category

 The next step consists of calculating cumulated  The next step consists of calculating cumulated

proportions for each item and ogives are constructed

 Scale values of each item are read from the ogives,

the values of each item being that point along the baseline in terms of scale value units above and below which 50% of the judges placed the item. It we‘ll be the median of the frequency distribution in which the score ranges from 0 to 11.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Projective Personality Tests

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Projective Techniques

Projective tests allow the examinee to respond to vague stimuli with their own impressions

Assumption is that the examinee will project his unconscious needs, motives, and conflicts onto the neutral stimulus

Word association tests, inkblot tests, sentence completion tests, storytelling in response to pictures, etc.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Projective Techniques (cont.)

 Three features:

  • Disguised: no face validity
  • Global: the whole personality
  • Reveals unconscious aspects of personality
  • Types:
  • Inkblot: Rorschach
  • Picture interpretation: TAT
slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Rorschach Inkblot Test

 The Rorschach Inkblot Test is the most

commonly used projective test

 In a 1971 survey of test usage, it was used in

91% of 251 clinical settings survey 91% of 251 clinical settings survey

 It is one of the most widely used tests that exists  It is widely cited in research

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What is the Rorschach?

 The stimuli were generated by dropping ink onto a card

and folding it

 They are not, however, random: the ten cards in the

current test were hand-selected out of thousands that Rorschach generated

 Ten blots – 5 black/white, 2 red/gray (II & III) and 3 color

(VIII – X)

 Thought to tap into the deep layers of personality and

bring out what is not conscious to the test taker

 The following are the inkblots

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Administering the Rorschach

 The test is usually administered with as little instruction

and information as possible

 The tester asks 'What might this be? and gives no clues or

restrictions on what is expected as a response

 Anxious subjects often do ask questions, and vague answers  Anxious subjects often do ask questions, and vague answers

are offered

 Some advocate sitting beside the subject to avoid giving

clues by facial expression

 If only one response is given, some hint to find more may be

  • ffered: "Some people see more than one thing.“
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Administering the Rorschach

 The cards are shown twice:  The first time responses are obtained - free

association phase association phase

 The second time they are elaborated – inquiry

phase

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Rorschach (cont.)

Exner’s Comprehensive Scoring System

  • 1. Location
  • W = whole (intellectual potential)
  • D = subdivisions (common sense)
  • Dd = details (compulsive tendencies)
  • Dd = details (compulsive tendencies)
  • DW (confabulated detail)
  • 2. Content (i.e., general class to where response

belongs)

  • people, part of a person, clothing, animal,

part of an animal, nature, anatomical

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Rorschach (cont.)

  • 3. Determinants (i.e., specific property of the blot)
  • F = shape/outline (rational approach)
  • M = movement (imagination)
  • C = color (emotional reactions)
  • C = color (emotional reactions)
  • Y = shades of grey (depression)
  • 4. Form Quality
  • 5. typical vs. unusual response
  • 6. time
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Rorschach (cont.)

  • norms = unrepresentative
  • inter-rater reliability
  • test-retest reliability
  • construct validity

criterion validity

  • criterion validity
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Psychometric Properties of the Rorschach

 The Rorschach is a popular test, however, it has been

plagued by low reliability and validity.

 Obviously, it is difficult to measure any of the usual

psychometric properties in the usual way

 Validity and reliability are usually low because of the

  • pen-ended multiplicity of possibility that is allowed and

by the lack of universally-accepted standardized instructions, administration protocol, and scoring procedure

 Reliability studies that have been done find r-

values varying from 0.1 to 0.9

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)

 Construct a story about what you see on the following picture Describe:

  • what led up to the scene
  • what is happening
  • what is happening
  • what the characters in the story might think or

feel

  • how the story will end
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thematic Apperception Tests

 The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): 30 grayscale

pictures + one blank for elicitation of stories – each contain a dramatic event or critical situation

 Most subjects see 10-12 cards, over two sessions  Based on Murray's (1938) theory of 28 social needs

(sex, affiliation, dominance, achievement, attitudes etc.)

 People would project into their story their needs  Attention is paid to the protagonist in each story and

his/her environmental stressors

 Many variations on this 'story-telling' test exist

slide-26
SLIDE 26

TAT (cont.)

 Administration: not standardized

  • Not the same 20 cards
  • Not the same order
  • Seldom 2 sessions
  • Seldom 2 sessions
  • Instructions differ
  • Scoring is Minimal
  • Low Reliability & Validity
slide-27
SLIDE 27

TAT – scoring/interpretation

Scoring

 Congruence with picture stimuli  Conformity with directions  Conflict

Psychometric properties: Psychometric properties:

 internal consistency is low;  high reliability but diminishes with time, 2 months, r = .80;

10 months r = .50;

 Inter-rater reliability vary with studies: range .3 to .9

slide-28
SLIDE 28