Malaysians’ Reaction to Provocative News Content
Moniza Waheed & Ezhar Tamam Universiti Putra Malaysia
MCMC Research Symposium: Malaysia on the Cusp of Hyper- Connectivity 21 November 2019 Putrajaya Mariott Hotel
1
Provocative News Content Moniza Waheed & Ezhar Tamam Universiti - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Malaysians Reaction to Provocative News Content Moniza Waheed & Ezhar Tamam Universiti Putra Malaysia MCMC Research Symposium: Malaysia on the Cusp of Hyper- Connectivity 21 November 2019 Putrajaya Mariott Hotel 1 Highlights on
MCMC Research Symposium: Malaysia on the Cusp of Hyper- Connectivity 21 November 2019 Putrajaya Mariott Hotel
1
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2018
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Variable % (N= 564) Gender Male Female 43.6 56.4 Age Mean Range SD 31.25 18-60 9.472 Ethnic group Malay Chinese Indian Others 44.7 29.8 21.3 10.3 Education Diploma and lower Bachelor Masters/PhD 39.1 51.6 10.3 Occupational sector Government sector Private sector Self-employed Student Others 26.1 31.2 7.1 27.7 8.0 Political interest Not at all interested Slightly interested Moderately interested Very interested 10.3 21.3 41.3 27.2 Political participation Not supporting any political party Support a particular political party 47.3 53.7
9
10
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Facebook WhatsApp Twitter % Always Reads News on Social Media (N=564)
5 10 15 20 25 30
Facebook WhatsApp Twitter % Always Post News on Social Media (N=564)
11
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Active (Social media as useful ways of getting news) Incidental (See news when on social media for other reasons) % Types of News Consumers (N= 564)
12
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Active n= 239 Incidental n= 173 % News consumers who always get their news on Facebook (N=564)
13
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Active n= 238 Incidental n= 162 % News consumers who always get their news on Whatsapp (N=564)
14
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Editors/journalists Algorithm Friends % News Selection Mechanisms (N=564)
15
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Never/rarely Sometimes Often Always % Exposure to Provocative News (N= 564)
16
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
nothing Read comments by others Get more information about the news Share with friends in social media Flagging the post
its harm % Reaction to Provocative News Active n= 166 Incidental n= 111
17
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
nothing Read comments by others Get more information about the news Share with friends in social media Flagging the post
its harm % Reaction to Provocative News Announcements Active n= 168 Incidental n= 106
18
Reaction to provocative news Most common reason (%) Not interested, do not want to get involved with such political issue Influencing public opinion to promote a particular point of view To inform people on what is happening To learn more about the report issue Seek enjoyment in the discussion on the news Ignore, do nothing n=84 89.3 Read comments by others n=138 44.2 Get more information about the news n= 217 70.5 Share/Forward n=51 68.6 Flagging the post n= 61 42.6
19
Social media news experience Percentage (N= 564) (Agree/Strongly agree) I hear about major news events on Facebook/WhatsApp/Twitter before I hear or read about them from tv/newspaper/radio. 79.5 I feel out of touch when I have not logged onto Facebook/WhatsApp/Twitter for a while 54.7 I am interested in creating/reposting news on social media 24.6 I feel comfortable debating about current events with anyone on social media 21.7
20
Frequency of use (%) (N=564) Methods of verifying news in the social media Never/Rarely Sometimes Often Always Look at the sources of the news to verify the news or post. 6.0 25.9 46.3 21.8 Cross verify with trustworthy new website(s) to make sure if the news is real or fake. 10.7 27.5 42.4 19.5 Check the tone and characteristics of the message (i.e., see if it’s deliberately misleading or false to arouse emotions). 17.2 30.1 35.3 15.4 Question the “motivation” of the person publishing the news. 23.9 25.5 36.3 14.2 Seek verification from others in my social sphere. 30.4 32.4 31.9 5.3
21