1
Protecting the SOA Credentials
LESLIE FAUSHER
E-Learning Manager
STUART KLUGMAN, FSA, CERA
Staff Fellow, Education
GENA LONG
Manager of Stakeholder Relations
RICHARD VEYS
General Counsel
2 2
2
Protecting the SOA Credentials LESLIE FAUSHER E-Learning Manager - - PDF document
Protecting the SOA Credentials LESLIE FAUSHER E-Learning Manager STUART KLUGMAN, FSA, CERA Staff Fellow, Education GENA LONG Manager of Stakeholder Relations RICHARD VEYS General Counsel Agenda Importance of the Discipline Process
1
LESLIE FAUSHER
E-Learning Manager
STUART KLUGMAN, FSA, CERA
Staff Fellow, Education
GENA LONG
Manager of Stakeholder Relations
RICHARD VEYS
General Counsel
2 2
2
2
3 3
3
4 4
4
3
5 5
5
6 6
6
4
7 7
7
8 8
8
5
9 9
9
Final Assessment Interim Assessment Exercises 19 16 104 Final Assessment + Exercises Interim Assessment + Exercises Final + Interim Assessments Final + Interim Assessment + Exercises DMAC
1 4 2
10 10
10
6
11 11
11
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
12 12
12
7
13 13
13
14 14
14
Plagiarism
and pass
without crediting the source
wrong Citations
reference to the source of the copied material
to do Collaboration
jointly with
together especially in an intellectual endeavor
Collusion
agreement
cooperation for an illegal or deceitful purpose
wrong
8
15 15
15
Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition.
16 16
16
9
17 17
17
Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition.
18 18
18
Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition.
10
19 19
19
submitting for grading.
printing process.
20 20
20
Copying or relying upon model solutions Disclosing, publishing or posting the contents of an assessment or model solution Submitting unrelated documents for EOM exercises Attempting to or actually purchasing or selling e-Learning materials Obtaining another candidate’s solution or working files
11
21 21
21
22 22
22
SOA becomes aware that there may have been improper behavior Specifics are checked by SOA staff If sufficient evidence of a violation, the discipline process begins
12
23 23
23
http://www.soa.org/education/ general-info/discipline/edu- infraction-report.aspx
24 24
24
13
25 25
25
26 26
26
The software is a mechanism for screening out the vast majority of pairs that have nothing in common. Papers that copy extensively from the problem statement or that cite commonly used sources may score high. A manual staff review eliminates common material that might appear by means other than violating the terms and conditions.
14
27 27
27
If the answer is yes, the materials are sent to the Education General Chair. Did the author of the second submission use the specific words, tables or presentations used by the author of the first submission?
28 28
28
If the General Chair decides the evidence is not sufficient, the case is ended with no further action. If the General Chair decides the evidence is not sufficient, the case is ended with no further action. If the General Chair decides that the terms and conditions have been violated If the General Chair decides that the terms and conditions have been violated Letter sent to the candidate(s) by the General Chair Letter indicates nature of the violation and the penalty to be imposed.
15
29 29
29
30 30
30
If candidate appeals, the original case materials and candidate’s appeal are sent to the Board Partner for Education. If candidate appeals, the original case materials and candidate’s appeal are sent to the Board Partner for Education. Board Partner may: Board Partner may:
Reverse the decision Uphold the decision Uphold the decision, with a reduction in the penalty.
16
31 31
31
32 32
32
17
http://soa.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_8CllgUxGVgwuIAs