Prospects of Prospects of combined measurements of combined - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLIDE 1

Dag Gillberg
 2016-08-31 Carleton University

Prospects of
 combined measurements of
 Higgs boson properties Prospects of
 combined measurements of Higgs boson properties

SLIDE 2

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Outline

• Outline
• LHC Schedule
• Run-1 highlights of Higgs boson measurements
• Run-2 first Higgs results
• Projections of Higgs boson results
• LHC and ATLAS detector upgrades
• Mass
• Couplings
• Rare decays
• Di-Higgs production

2

SLIDE 3

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

LHC Schedule

3

• LHC operates very well: 


current data acquisition exceeds expectation

• Higher centre-of-mass energy means larger cross sections


ggF, VBF, VH: ~ ⨉2, ttH ⨉4 (similar for associated backgrounds)

• Expect
• 30 fb-1 @ 13 TeV by end of 2016
• 120 fb-1 @ 13-13.5 TeV by end or Run-2, 2018
• ~300 fb-1 @ 13-14 TeV by end of Run-3, 2023
• ~3000 fb-1 @ 14 TeV, HL-LHC, 2026-2037

13.5 TeV?

30+120 = 150

2026-2037

SLIDE 4

• I. Run-1 highlights

based on ~25 fb-1 7-8 TeV data

SLIDE 5

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Run-1 Higgs boson highlights

5

Bertrand Laforge, ICHEP 2016

[GeV]

bb

m 50 100 150 200 250 Weighted events after subtraction / 20.0 GeV 2 4 6 8 10

Data 2012 =1.0) µ VH(bb) ( Diboson Uncertainty

ATLAS

• 1

Ldt = 20.3 fb

∫

= 8 TeV s 0+1+2 lep., 2+3 jets, 2 tags Weighted by Higgs S/B

H→bb
 1.7σ (2.7σ)

(S / B)

10

log

• 4
• 3
• 2
• 1

1 Events / bin 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

ATLAS

• 1

, 20.3 fb

= 8 TeV s

• 1

, 4.5 fb

= 7 TeV s

τ τ → H

Data =1.4) µ Background ( =0) µ Background ( =1.4) µ ( τ τ → (125) H =1) µ ( τ τ → (125) H

H→ττ
 4.5σ (3.4σ)

200 400 600 800 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 stat ± Obs syst ± Bkg Higgs WW Misid VV Top DY Bkg

• Obs

syst ± Bkg Higgs (b) Background-subtracted [GeV]

T

m Events / 10 GeV µ µ ee/ + µ e , 1 ≤

j

n (a) Events / 10 GeV

ATLAS

• 1

fb 20.3 TeV, =8 s

• 1

fb 4.5 TeV, =7 s

WW* → H

H→WW*
 6.8σ (5.8σ)

[GeV]

l 4

m 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 Events / 2.5 GeV 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Data = 1.51) µ = 125 GeV

H

Signal (m Background ZZ* t Background Z+jets, t Systematic uncertainty

l 4 → ZZ* → H

• 1

Ldt = 4.5 fb

∫

= 7 TeV s

• 1

Ldt = 20.3 fb

∫

= 8 TeV s

ATLAS

H→ZZ*
 8.1σ (6.2σ)

[GeV]

γ γ

m

110 120 130 140 150 160 weights - fitted bkg

∑

• 5

5 10

weights / GeV

∑

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Data Signal+background Background Signal = 7 TeV s ,

• 1

dt = 4.5 fb L

∫

= 8 TeV s ,

• 1

dt = 20.3 fb L

∫

S/B weighted sum Signal strength categories = 125.4 GeV

H

m

ATLAS

H→γγ
 5.0σ (4.6σ)

PRD 90 (2014) 902015 PRD 91 (2015) 012006 PRD 92 (2015) 012006 JHEP 01 (2015) 069 JHEP 04 (2015) 117

σ(H → Zγ) < 11 × SM

σ(H → µµ) < 7 × SM

Observed (expected) sign. from

JHEP 08 (2016) 045

SLIDE 6

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

h +

= 0

P

J

−

= 0

P

J

g

κ =

q

κ

+

= 2

P

J

<300 GeV

T

p =0

q

κ

+

= 2

P

J

<125 GeV

T

p =0

q

κ

+

= 2

P

J

<300 GeV

T

p

g

κ =2

q

κ

+

= 2

P

J

<125 GeV

T

p

g

κ =2

q

κ

+

= 2

P

J

q ~

• 30
• 20
• 10

10 20 30 40

ATLAS l 4 → ZZ* → H

• 1

= 7 TeV, 4.5 fb s

• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s

νµν e → WW* → H

• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s

γ γ → H

• 1

= 7 TeV, 4.5 fb s

• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s Observed Expected σ 1 ± SM

+

σ 2 ± SM

+

σ 3 ± SM

+

σ 1 ±

P

J σ 2 ±

P

J σ 3 ±

P

J

[GeV]

H

m

123 124 125 126 127 128 129

Total Stat. Syst. CMS and ATLAS Run 1 LHC

Total Stat. Syst. l +4 γ γ CMS + ATLAS 0.11) GeV ± 0.21 ± 0.24 ( ± 125.09 l 4 CMS + ATLAS 0.15) GeV ± 0.37 ± 0.40 ( ± 125.15 γ γ CMS + ATLAS 0.14) GeV ± 0.25 ± 0.29 ( ± 125.07 l 4 → ZZ → H CMS 0.17) GeV ± 0.42 ± 0.45 ( ± 125.59 l 4 → ZZ → H ATLAS 0.04) GeV ± 0.52 ± 0.52 ( ± 124.51 γ γ → H CMS 0.15) GeV ± 0.31 ± 0.34 ( ± 124.70 γ γ → H ATLAS 0.27) GeV ± 0.43 ± 0.51 ( ± 126.02

Run-1 Higgs boson results

• Precision of mass measurement: 0.2% 240 MeV
• Statistically limited, especially for ZZ*→4l : stat error ≈ 10 ⨉ syst error
• Consistent with SM spin/CP expectation 0+


Alternative models (spin 2, negative parity, etc.) excluded at at least 99.9% CL 6 Higgs boson mass Spin/CP

˜ q

EPJC 75 (2015) 476 PRL 114 (2015) 191803

SLIDE 7

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

V

κ

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

F

κ

4 − 3 − 2 − 1 − 1 2 3 4

ATLAS

• 1

= 7 TeV, 4.5-4.7 fb s

• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s = 125.36 GeV

H

m

γ γ → H ZZ* → H WW* → H τ τ → H bb → H Combined

SM 68% CL Best fit 95% CL

(a)

ggF+ttH f

µ

2 − 1 − 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

VBF+VH f

µ

2 − 1 − 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

ATLAS

• 1

= 7 TeV, 4.5-4.7 fb s

• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s = 125.36 GeV

H

m WW* → H ZZ* → H bb → H γ γ → H τ τ → H Standard Model Best fit 68% CL 95% CL

Run-1 Higgs boson results

• The Higgs boson production and decay were

studied using

• Dedicated analyses in 7 different decay

modes (γγ, ZZ*, WW*, bb, ττ, Zγ, µµ)

• Full Run-1 dataset: ~25 fb-1
• All results are consistent with the Standard

Model expectation

• “Micro-anomalies”: 


H→bb low by ~2.5σ, ttH high by ~2.3σ

7

EPJC (2016) 76:6

SLIDE 8

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Run-1 Higgs boson results

• Differential cross sections and normalized shapes of kinematic distributions

measured both in individual channels (fiducial regions of γγ, ZZ*, WW*) and combined (γγ+ZZ*), correcting for acceptances and branching ratio

• Higgs boson pT, jet multiplicity, mjj, etc.
• “Micro-anomalies”: pT,H spectrum harder and more jets (see below)


p-value for SM-agreement: 4% (8%) or better for norm+shape (shape-only)

8

• Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 091801

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 [pb/GeV]

H T

p / d σ d

2 −

10

1 −

10 1

XH +

ES

HR H b b + H t t + VH = VBF + XH

H → pp

ATLAS

data, tot. unc.

• syst. unc.
• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s

[GeV]

H T

p

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

HRes

Ratio to

2 4

| [pb] 40

1 2 3 4 5 6 [pb] σ

1 10

2

10

XH 8 +

Y

+P

NLOPS

N XH 8 +

Y

+P

MG5_aMC@NLO

XH +

HERPA 2.1.1

S XH STWZ + XH BLPTW +

H b b + H t t + VH = VBF + XH

H → pp

ATLAS

data, tot. unc.

• syst. unc.
• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s > 30 GeV

jet T

p = 0.4, R

t

k anti-

jets

N

1 ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ = 0 = 1 = 2

NNLOPS

Ratio to 2 4

SLIDE 9

• II. Current Run-2 results

H→γγ, 13.3 fb-1 H→ZZ→4l, 14.8 fb-1 See talk by Yusheng Wu for details on the individual analyses

SLIDE 10

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

[TeV]

s 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

[pb]

H → pp

σ 20 40 60 80 100 ATLAS Preliminary

= 125.09 GeV

H

m

H → pp

σ

QCD scale uncertainty

)

s

α PDF+ ⊕ (scale

• Tot. uncert.

γ γ → H l 4 → * ZZ → H

• comb. data
• syst. unc.
• 1

= 7 TeV, 4.5 fb s

• 1

= 8 TeV, 20.3 fb s *) ZZ (

• 1

), 14.8 fb γ γ (

• 1

= 13 TeV, 13.3 fb s

pp→H cross section (γγ+4l)

10

• Extracted event yields after

analysis selection (without further categorization) are converted to a production
 cross section:
 
 
 


• Profile likelihood ratio fit with

systematics implemented as ~200 nuisance parameters used

σpp→H = ndata ε L × 1 BSM ASM

Fiducial cross section BR and acc.
 Fiducial → total
 extrapolation

boson mass of 125.09 GeV [9]. Decay channel Total cross section (pp → H + X) √s =7 TeV √s =8 TeV √s =13 TeV H → 35+13

−12 pb

30.5+7.5

−7.4 pb

37+14

−13 pb

H → ZZ∗ → 4` 33+21

−16 pb

37+9

−8 pb

81+18

−16 pb

Combination 34 ± 10 (stat.) +4

−2 (syst.) pb

33.3+5.5

−5.3 (stat.) +1.7 −1.3 (syst.) pb

59.0+9.7

−9.2 (stat.) +4.4 −3.5 (syst.) pb

SM predictions [7] 19.2 ± 0.9 pb 24.5 ± 1.1 pb 55.5+2.4

−3.4 pb

SLIDE 11

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Run-2 Higgs boson couplings

• Targeting Higgs production mode with dedicated

analysis event categories: 13 for γγ, 5 for ZZ→4l.

• Combined fits for cross sections and coupling

parameters performed using these categories

• Global signal strength:


~10σ (8.6σ) significance

• Fitted production mode cross sections (below and

right) consistent with SM expectation

11

VBF vs ggF SM BR
 assumed

SLIDE 12

• III. Projected results
• 120 fb-1 @ 13-13.5 TeV by end or Run-2, 2018
• ~300 fb-1 @ 13-14 TeV by end of Run-3, 2023
• ~3000 fb-1 @ 14 TeV, HL-LHC, 2026-2037 (Runs 4&5)

SLIDE 13

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Detector upgrades

13

HL-LHC

• During the HL-LHC

beam intensity will increase to ⨉7.5 the design intensity

• Major detector detector

upgrades needed

• Main detector improvements with implications on physics:
• New all-silicon tracker with significantly improved fwd. coverage: |η|<4 (now 2.5)
• Improved granularity of forward calorimeter
• Improved triggering capabilities
• New high-granularity timing detector in the forward region
• Will improve capabilities to suppress pileup, in particular in the forward region:


→ enhanced precision to study events with VBF topology

• Projections for Run-3 (300 fb-1) and HL-LHC (3000 fb-1) derived using MC hadron-

level samples with detector smearing functions derived from full simulation of the expected upgraded detector and the correspond to the expected beam conditions

SLIDE 14

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Projections

14

Higgs boson mass Run-1 result
 γγ: ±0.43 (stat) ±0.27 (sys) GeV
 ZZ*: ±0.53 (stat) ±0.04 (sys) GeV
 ATLAS comb: ±0.36 GeV
 
 due to smaller systematics, ZZ will drive the mass measurement by the end of Run-2 (120 fb-1): ~±0.20 GeV

All H→γγ H→ZZ→4l

H→WW*→lνlν

13.3 0.75M 600 20 400 120 7M 6,000 200 4,000 300 17M 14,000 500 10,000 3000 170M 140,000 5,000 100,000

L [fb−1]

Expected event yields After full analysis selection


(rough approximation)

Goals for ATLAS Higgs physics program

• Improve precision on Higgs boson

coupling and cross section measurements

• Establish rare Higgs decays
• Study Higgs self coupling
• Search for BSM signatures

SLIDE 15

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

µ / µ ∆ 0.2 0.4

(comb.) (VBF-like) (comb.) (incl.) (comb.) (comb.) (comb.)

ATLAS Simulation Preliminary

= 14 TeV: s

• 1

Ldt=300 fb

∫

;

• 1

Ldt=3000 fb

∫

γ γ → H ZZ → H WW → H γ Z → H b b → H τ τ → H µ µ → H γ γ → H ZZ → H WW → H γ Z → H b b → H τ τ → H µ µ → H

)

Y

κ

X

κ ( ∆ =

XY

λ ∆ 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

)Z γ (Z

λ

Z γ

λ

gZ

λ

Z µ

λ

Z τ

λ

bZ

λ

tg

λ

WZ

λ

gZ

κ

ATLAS Simulation Preliminary

= 14 TeV: s

• 1

Ldt=300 fb

∫

;

• 1

Ldt=3000 fb

∫

Higgs coupling measurements

15

Precision on signal strength Precision on Higgs coupling ratios:
 λXY = κX/κY

Higgs coupling vs mass
 (PR plot) ~9% ~4% ~3.5% ~2%

Global Higgs boson signal strength/ rate precision (stat+exp. unc. only):
 → ICHEP, 13.3 fb-1, 18% (γγ+ZZ only)
 → Run-2, 120 fb-1, ~7% (γγ+ZZ)
 → Run-3, 300 fb-1, ~5%
 → HL-LHC, 3 ab-1, ~2.5%

i

y

• 3

10

• 2

10

• 1

10 1 Z W t b τ µ ATLAS Simulation Preliminary

= 14 TeV s

ν l ν l → WW* → 4l, h → ZZ* → , h γ γ → h γ Z → , h µ µ → bb, h → , h τ τ → h ]

µ

κ ,

τ

κ ,

b

κ ,

t

κ ,

W

κ ,

Z

κ [ =0

i,u

BR

• 1

dt = 300 fb L

∫

• 1

dt = 3000 fb L

∫

[GeV]

i

m

• 1

10 1 10

2

10 Ratio to SM

0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2

ATL-PUB-2014-016

SLIDE 16

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Di-Higgs and rare decays

16

HH→γγbb 1.3σ excess
 expected w. 3 ab-1 (8 events) The Higgs boson self coupling H→Zγ→eeγ, 3.9σ excess expected in 3 ab-1
 ~25% uncertainty on rate H→µµ, 7.0σ excess expected in 3 ab-1
 ~21% error on rate SM sensitivity (1σ) expected with 
 ~70 fb-1 (2018)

Combination with many other 
 decay channels will improve
 the sensitivity.


ATL-PUB-2014-006 ATL-PUB-2013-014 ATL-PUB-2014-019

SLIDE 17

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

H !ττ

· · · · · · · · ·

H ! γγ

VBF loose (MVA) high pT t VBF tight (MVA) low pT t t¯ tH leptonic VH leptonic

H !ZZ

· · · · · · · · · = 0-jet

H !W W

= 1-jet 2-jet VBF cuts

H !b¯ b

MVA high pT(V ) MVA low pT(V ) · · · · · · · · ·

σ(t¯ tH)

σ(VH)

low pV

T

high pV

T

very high pV

T

ratios of Γγγ ΓZZ ΓW W Γb¯

b Γττ

(ΓZγ Γµµ)

= 0-jet 1-jet

σ(b¯ bH) σ(tH)

Rest

σ(VBF)

2-jet VBF cuts high-q2 BSM ' 2-jet & 3-jet = 0-jet 1-jet

σ(ggF)

2-jet VBF cuts · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

µi, κi gk EFT coeffs specific BSM

Higgs cross sections

• Measurements of fiducial and differential cross sections will be done in individual channels
• Back-of-the-envelope precision of σ(pTH>100 GeV) for γγ+ZZ combination:


~40%, ~14%, ~5% with 13.3 fb-1, 120 fb-1, 3000 fb-1

• Simplified template cross sections provides natural way to combine different channels


→ cross sections extracted via global fit

• “Stage-0” measurements already performed for ICHEP 2016
• “Stage-1” measurements as outlined in Yellow Report 4 are in progress

17

Yellow Report 4

SLIDE 18

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

H !ττ

· · · · · · · · ·

H ! γγ

VBF loose (MVA) high pT t VBF tight (MVA) low pT t t¯ tH leptonic VH leptonic

H !ZZ

· · · · · · · · · = 0-jet

H !W W

= 1-jet 2-jet VBF cuts

H !b¯ b

MVA high pT(V ) MVA low pT(V ) · · · · · · · · ·

σ(t¯ tH)

σ(VH)

low pV

T

high pV

T

very high pV

T

ratios of Γγγ ΓZZ ΓW W Γb¯

b Γττ

(ΓZγ Γµµ)

= 0-jet 1-jet

σ(b¯ bH) σ(tH)

Rest

σ(VBF)

2-jet VBF cuts high-q2 BSM ' 2-jet & 3-jet = 0-jet 1-jet

σ(ggF)

2-jet VBF cuts · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

µi, κi gk EFT coeffs specific BSM

Higgs cross sections

• Measurements of fiducial and differential cross sections will be done in individual channels
• Back-of-the-envelope precision of σ(pTH>100 GeV) for γγ+ZZ combination:


~40%, ~14%, ~5% with 13.3 fb-1, 120 fb-1, 3000 fb-1

• Simplified template cross sections provides natural way to combine different channels


→ cross sections extracted via global fit

• “Stage-0” measurements already performed for ICHEP 2016
• “Stage-1” measurements as outlined in Yellow Report 4 are in progress

18

Yellow Report 4

= 0-jet

ggF

2-jet pH

T [200, 1]

BSM

pH

T [0, 60]

pH

T [60, 120]

pH

T [120, 200]

= 1-jet pH

T [200, 1]

BSM

pH

T [0, 60]

pH

T [60, 120]

pH

T [120, 200]

(+) (+) (+) (+) (+) 2-jet pHjj

T

[0, 25] pHjj

T

[25, 1]

' 2j & 3j pH

T < 200

VBF cuts

Higgs simplified template cross section, “Stage-1” ggF categorization

SLIDE 19

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Summary

• LHC Run-2 currently delivers data beyond expectation
• High-quality data being recorded by the ATLAS detector
• In ICHEP dataset, the Higgs boson was observed in the γγ+ZZ channels with

~10σ (8.6σ) observed (expected) significance

• Preliminary measurements of the Higgs boson cross section and couplings

examined in first Run-2 and are consistent with SM expectations

• Significant detector upgrades and improvements will be installed for HL-LHC

phase: 2026-2035, during with we expect to collect 3 ab-1 data

• In particular improvements will be made to the forward region:


tracking extended to |eta|<4 + improved calorimetry and timing detector
 → increase acceptance for all physics objects
 → improve ETmiss resolution
 → in particular helpful for VBF topology

• Higgs physics remains a very important part of the LHC physics program
• Improve precision of cross section and coupling measurements
• Study Higgs self coupling
• Search for rare decays and BSM signatures

19

SLIDE 20

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

References

• ATLAS Run-1 papers
• H→γγ, H→ZZ→4l, H→WW*, H→bb, H→ττ
• Mass (ATLAS+CMS), Spin/CP, couplings, differential, couplings (ATLAS+CMS)
• ATLAS Run-2 conference note for ICHEP 2016
• ATLAS-CONF-2016-067, H→γγ
• ATLAS-CONF-2016-079, H→4l
• ATLAS-CONF-2016-081, γγ+ZZ combination
• ATLAS public projection, 300 and 3000 fb-1
• ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-016, Higgs couplings
• ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-017, BSM Higgs
• ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-006, H→Zγ
• ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-019, HH→bbγγ
• Full list:


https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/HiggsPublicResults

20

SLIDE 21

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

More Run-2 coupling results

21

Parameter value norm. to SM value 4 − 2 − 2 4 6

γ γ top

B) ⋅ σ (

γ γ VHlep

B) ⋅ σ (

γ γ VHhad

B) ⋅ σ (

γ γ VBF

B) ⋅ σ (

ZZ VBF

B) ⋅ σ (

γ γ ggF

B) ⋅ σ (

ZZ ggF

B) ⋅ σ (

ATLAS Preliminary =125.09 GeV

H

m (ZZ)

• 1

), 14.8 fb γ γ (

• 1

=13 TeV, 13.3 fb s

Observed 68% CL SM Prediction

Parameter value norm. to SM value 1 2 3 4 5

ggF

σ /

VBF

σ

ZZ

/B

γ γ

B

ZZ ggF

B) ⋅ σ (

ATLAS Preliminary =125.09 GeV

H

m (ZZ)

• 1

), 14.8 fb γ γ (

• 1

=13 TeV, 13.3 fb s

Observed 68% CL SM Prediction

SLIDE 22

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Projected signal strengths uncertainties

22

∆µ/µ 300 fb−1 All unc. No theory unc. H → γγ (comb.) 0.13 0.09 (0j) 0.19 0.12 (1j) 0.27 0.14 (VBF-like) 0.47 0.43 (WH-like) 0.48 0.48 (ZH-like) 0.85 0.85 (ttH-like) 0.38 0.36 H → ZZ (comb.) 0.11 0.07 (VH-like) 0.35 0.34 (ttH-like) 0.49 0.48 (VBF-like) 0.36 0.33 (ggF-like) 0.12 0.07 H → WW (comb.) 0.13 0.08 (0j) 0.18 0.09 (1j) 0.30 0.18 (VBF-like) 0.21 0.20 H → Zγ (incl.) 0.46 0.44 H → b¯ b (comb.) 0.26 0.26 (WH-like) 0.57 0.56 (ZH-like) 0.29 0.29 H → ττ (VBF-like) 0.21 0.18 H → µµ (comb.) 0.39 0.38 (incl.) 0.47 0.45 (ttH-like) 0.74 0.72 3000 fb−1 All unc. No theory unc. 0.09 0.04 0.16 0.05 0.23 0.05 0.22 0.15 0.19 0.17 0.28 0.27 0.17 0.12 0.09 0.04 0.13 0.12 0.20 0.16 0.21 0.16 0.11 0.04 0.11 0.05 0.16 0.05 0.26 0.10 0.15 0.09 0.30 0.27 0.14 0.12 0.37 0.36 0.14 0.13 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.12 0.18 0.14 0.27 0.23

ATL-PUB-2014-016

SLIDE 23

Dag Gillberg (Carleton)

Expected precision on Higgs couplings

23

Nr. Coupling 300 fb−1 3000 fb−1 Theory unc.: Theory unc.: All Half None All Half None 1 κ 4.2% 3.0% 2.4% 3.2% 2.2% 1.7% κV = κZ = κW 4.3% 3.0% 2.5% 3.3% 2.2% 1.7% 2 κF = κt = κb = κτ = κµ 8.8% 7.5% 7.1% 5.1% 3.8% 3.2% κZ 4.7% 3.7% 3.3% 3.3% 2.3% 1.9% 3 κW 4.9% 3.6% 3.1% 3.6% 2.4% 1.8% κF 9.3% 7.9% 7.3% 5.4% 4.0% 3.4% κV 5.9% 5.4% 5.3% 3.7% 3.2% 3.0% 4 κu 8.9% 7.7% 7.2% 5.4% 4.0% 3.4% κd 12% 12% 12% 6.7% 6.2% 6.1% κV 4.3% 3.1% 2.5% 3.3% 2.2% 1.7% 5 κq 11% 8.7% 7.8% 6.6% 4.5% 3.6% κl 10% 9.6% 9.3% 6.0% 5.3% 5.1% κV 4.3% 3.1% 2.5% 3.3% 2.2% 1.7% 6 κq 11% 9.0% 8.1% 6.7% 4.7% 3.8% κτ 12% 11% 11% 9.2% 8.4% 8.1% κµ 20% 20% 19% 6.9% 6.3% 6.1% κZ 8.1% 7.9% 7.8% 4.3% 3.9% 3.8% κW 8.5% 8.2% 8.1% 4.8% 4.1% 3.9% 7 κt 14% 12% 11% 8.2% 6.1% 5.3% κb 23% 22% 22% 12% 11% 10% κτ 14% 13% 13% 9.8% 9.0% 8.7% κµ 21% 21% 21% 7.3% 7.1% 7.0% κZ 8.1% 7.9% 7.9% 4.4% 4.0% 3.8% κW 9.0% 8.7% 8.6% 5.1% 4.5% 4.2% κt 22% 21% 20% 11% 8.5% 7.6% κb 23% 22% 22% 12% 11% 10% 8 κτ 14% 14% 13% 9.7% 9.0% 8.8% κµ 21% 21% 21% 7.5% 7.2% 7.1% κg 14% 12% 11% 9.1% 6.5% 5.3% κγ 9.3% 9.0% 8.9% 4.9% 4.3% 4.1% κZγ 24% 24% 24% 14% 14% 14% √

ATL-PUB-2014-016