PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONS 22 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

proposed infrastructure levy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONS 22 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONS 22 MARCH 2007 BACKGROUND Local Government is trustee of substantial public assets. 30 June 06, Councils financial reports revealed a WDV of infrastructure assets at


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONS 22 MARCH 2007

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BACKGROUND

  • Local Government is trustee of substantial public assets.
  • 30 June 06, Council’s financial reports revealed a WDV of

infrastructure assets at $171.54M.

  • Council values its assets by the at cost methodology.

International Accounting Standards shortly demand fair value approach. This will further exacerbate problem as it will increase value of assets, increase depreciation level & thus increase Council’s funding deficiency.

  • In Sep 05 LGSA commissioned an independent inquiry into

the Financial Sustainability of Local Gov’t in NSW.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

FINDINGS

  • Huge backlog in Infrastructure renewals in

NSW (over $6 billion) which is expected to grow to almost 21 billion within 15 years if current expenditure patterns remain static.

  • Cost shifting (out of every rate $ collected

7.5 cents goes back to State).

  • Managing rising community expect.
  • Maintaining existing services in the face of

huge infrastructure bills.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

REALITY

Quite clear that no level of government is meeting their charter re Infrastructure

  • Management. (Just look at State Gov’t in

elation to water, energy, transport, health, ducation & telecommunications) Council wants to take initiative & ensure nfrastructure receives investment it requires.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

LEVY

THE ASSETS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

AIM (Total Asset Management System)

  • Complete condition statement
  • Accurate Data
  • Categories
  • Financial System Link
  • Cost Details – Historical and Tracking
  • Prioritisation
  • Management & Maintenance Strategies
  • Adaptable & ‘Living’
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Buildings

Actual Condition

Acceptable (12) Marginal (9) Unacceptable (3)

Current Condition (25 Sites Audited)

  • Comparison between desired and actual condition shows

concern for several facilities.

  • From an analysis of the acceptable condition of facilities
  • verall half appear to be below the desired condition.

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Green Orange Red Actual Condition Remaining Useful Life Backlog

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Priority 1 Sites

  • Clifton Gardens Amenity Block - $250,000 (Replacement)
  • Rosherville Reserve Amenity Block - $150,000 (Replacement)
  • Boronia House - $64,000 (backlog)

Priority 2 Sites

  • Oval Buildings (Backlog works) - $70,000
  • Change Facilities/Toilet Block Upgrades - $75,000

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

Buildings

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Roads

NETWORK CONDITION REPORT COMPLETED 2005

  • ROUGHNESS
  • RAVELLING
  • STRUCTURAL CRACKING
  • PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
  • KERB & GUTTER

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

Roads

Funding Levels (from 2005 Pavement Assessment) Required Annually - $1,000,000 Actual Allocation (Ave. 2000-05) - $710,000 Mosman Council Community Survey (2006) identified “construction & maintenance of local roads” as one of the top 3 issues for residents

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Footpaths

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

PRIORITY ACTIONS

  • Condition surveys to be completed for new 5 year programme
  • Required Annual Expenditure Level - $350,000
  • Actual expenditure (Ave. 2000-05) - $275,000
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Marine Structures

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

  • Balmoral Baths: $250,000 works to complete
  • Clifton Gardens: Condition Audit ($10,000) & Future works of

>$100,000

  • Edwards Beach: Retain or Remove – $40,000
  • Annual Maintenance costs - $25,000 (swells, net inspections)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Parks & Reserves

Plans of Management (Upgrade to achieve AS)

  • Clifton Gardens: Shade Sail, Picnic Area Upgrade - $200,000
  • Balmoral: Floodlight Improvements - $45,000
  • Replacement Fencing to Allan Border Oval - $85,000
  • Replacement Fencing to Rawson Park - $85,000
  • Play Equipment: Rosherville Res, Hunter Park, Spit West,

Beaconsfield Road - $250,000

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

slide-14
SLIDE 14

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

Stormwater

Condition Audit analysis underway to identify standard of assets CCTV Analysis – North Sydney Total Replacement Cost - $43m New pipes in areas where none exist - $11m Present situation - $2m works identified on unfunded works list Annual maintenance costs - $100,000

slide-15
SLIDE 15

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

1653 different sections of wall in Mosman 33 rated condition 5 – Poor & in need of major work within 2 years 172 rated condition 4 – Defects & in need of major work within 5 years 281 rated condition 3 – Serviceable and inspect annually 264 rated condition 2 – Generally sound and inspect 3 yearly 903 rated condition 1 – Acceptable and inspect 5 yearly

Retaining Walls

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Refuge Islands
  • Street Signs
  • Benches
  • Fencing
  • Handrails
  • Steps & Stairs

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

Street Furniture

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Infrastructure Levy 5 year Programme

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Year % Spend of $750,000 Annual Levy Stormwater Ovals & Reserves Buildings Marine Structures Footpaths Roads Stormwater 100 100 100 100 100 Ovals & Reserves 100 50 50 50 Buildings 50 200 150 150 150 Marine Structures 150 100 50 50 50 Footpaths 100 100 150 150 150 Roads 250 250 250 250 250 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Third Party Issues Third Party Issues

Energy Australia Sydney Water Similar with Telstra Private Property/DA Connections

INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY

slide-19
SLIDE 19

THE WAY FORWARD

  • Future Mosman identified the importance of developing

& maintaining infrastructure & its future funding.

  • Nov 05 DLG undertook review-key recommendations:
  • Develop systems to provide $$ funding needed to

maintain, replace & enhance assets (actioned)

  • Complete Asset Management Plan to ensure it was in a

position to consult the community regarding any additional funding required to maintain infrastructure assets (actioned).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

RAISING FUNDS

  • Funding of Infrastructure renewal can take form
  • f grants, borrowings, partnerships & rate base

as discussed in Sustainability report.

  • Considered that best mix for Mosman is a rate

increase supplemented with grants as additional loan commitments would place too much burden

  • n Working Capital.
  • Recent community survey (18% accept a I/L of

12%)

  • User Charges-Non Rateable W’shops, Parking at

Balmoral

slide-21
SLIDE 21

DLG SUPPORT

  • DLG has encouraged applications provided they

supply detailed business cases which clearly specify targets, set priorities, provide sound management & reporting are costed & have community support.

  • In 06/07 approx 40 applications (largely based
  • n I/Renewal with an approx 85% success rate.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

$$$$/LEVY

  • Estimated 39.808M required over next 10 years.

22.118M as 1 off (above what is programmed into forward estimates).

  • 6% rate increase would provide revenue of

approx $750K.

  • 6% would equate on average to increase in

residential rate of $56 p/a & $132 p/a business rate.

  • Given scope of works applicationn would be for

unlimited time span.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

THE FUTURE

  • Much of our infrastructure is out of sight, but it

should not be out of mind. The time has come for us to work together to ensure that it receives the attention & investment necessary for it to be maintained for generations to come.

  • As a ratepayer your private investment in Mosman

is substantial & Council intends to keep it as such.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

THANK YOU THANK YOU

QUESTIONS