properties of the automorphism group and a probabilistic
play

Properties of the automorphism group and a probabilistic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Properties of the automorphism group and a probabilistic construction of a class of countable labeled structures Dragan Ma sulovi c and Igor Dolinka Department of Mathematics and Informatics University of Novi Sad, Serbia AAA 83 Novi


  1. Properties of the automorphism group and a probabilistic construction of a class of countable labeled structures Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka Department of Mathematics and Informatics University of Novi Sad, Serbia AAA 83 Novi Sad, 17 Mar 2012 Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 1 / 23

  2. Automorphism groups of Fra¨ ıss´ e limits Questions: Probabilistic construction Simplicity of the automorphism group Small index property Bergman property Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 2 / 23

  3. Automorphism groups of Fra¨ ıss´ e limits Questions: Probabilistic construction Simplicity of the automorphism group Small index property Bergman property A helpful assumption: Aut ( F ) is oligomorphic Contrast: rational Urysohn space Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 2 / 23

  4. Automorphism groups of Fra¨ ıss´ e limits We would like to consider some of these questions but in the setting where Aut ( F ) is not oligomorphic. Our starting point: labeled graphs The requirement that Aut ( F ) be oligomorphic will be replaced by other types finiteness requirements. Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 3 / 23

  5. Labeled structures L = { R i : i ∈ N } — countable relational language Ar ( L ) = { ar ( R ) : R ∈ L } A relational language L has bounded arity if there is an n ∈ N such that Ar ( L ) ⊆ { 1 , 2 , . . . , n } . Definition. An L -structure A is labeled if for every n ∈ Ar ( L ) and every a ∈ A n there exists exactly one R ∈ L n such that A | = R ( a ) . An L -structure A is partially labeled if for every n ∈ Ar ( L ) and every a ∈ A n there exists at most one R ∈ L n such that A | = R ( a ) . Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 4 / 23

  6. Labeled structures Definition. A labeled L -structure A ∗ is a filling of a partially labeled L -structure A if they have the same base set and A � A ∗ . A class A of partially labeled L -structures has uniform fillings in a class B of labeled L-structures if there is a mapping ( · ) ∗ : A → B such that for all A , B ∈ A : A ∗ is a filling of A , and if f is an isomorphism from A onto B , then f is also an isomorphism from A ∗ onto B ∗ . Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 5 / 23

  7. Labeled structures Our labeled structures may implement certain restrictions expressed by means of special Horn clauses over L ∪ {� = } . A Horn restriction over L is a Horn clause of the form Φ = ¬ ( R 1 ( v 1 ) ∧ . . . ∧ R n ( v n )) where R 1 , . . . , R n ∈ L ∪ {� = } and R i ∈ L for at least one i . Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 6 / 23

  8. Labeled structures – The setup Condition (A) L — a countable relational language of bounded arity Σ — a set of Horn restrictions over L Σ | L 0 is finite for every finite L 0 ⊆ L P Σ — the class of all finite partially lbld L -structures satisfying Σ K Σ — the class of all labeled structures in P Σ for all A , B ∈ K Σ : A ⊔ B ∈ P Σ for all A , B , C ∈ K Σ : B ⊔ A C belongs to P Σ ; P Σ has uniform fillings in K Σ . Fact. K Σ is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class. Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 7 / 23

  9. Example: Graphs L = { R 0 ( · , · ) , R 1 ( · , · ) } Σ : ¬ R 1 ( x , x ) ¬ ( R 1 ( x , y ) ∧ R 0 ( y , x ) ∧ x � = y ) Uniform fillings: if ( a , a ) is not labeled in G , label it by R 0 ; if R 1 ( a , b ) but ( b , a ) is unlabeled, label ( b , a ) by R 1 ; if neither ( a , b ) nor ( b , a ) are labeled, label both by R 0 . Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 8 / 23

  10. Example: K m -free graphs L = { R 0 ( · , · ) , R 1 ( · , · ) } Σ : ¬ R 1 ( x , x ) ¬ ( R 1 ( x , y ) ∧ R 0 ( y , x ) ∧ x � = y ) �� �� � ¬ x i � = x j ∧ R 1 ( x i , x j ) ∧ R 1 ( x j , x i ) 1 � i < j � m Uniform fillings: if ( a , a ) is not labeled in G , label it by R 0 ; if R 1 ( a , b ) but ( b , a ) is unlabeled, label ( b , a ) by R 1 ; if neither ( a , b ) nor ( b , a ) are labeled, label both by R 0 . Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 9 / 23

  11. Example: Edge-colored graphs I — a nonempty countable set 0 ∈ I — arbitrary but fixed L I = { R b ( · , · ) : b ∈ I } Σ I : ¬ R b ( x , x ) for all b ∈ I \ { 0 } ¬ ( R b ( x , y ) ∧ R c ( y , x ) ∧ x � = y ) for all b , c ∈ I s. t. b � = c Uniform fillings: symmetrize, label every unlabeled tuple by R 0 . Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 10 / 23

  12. Example: Metric spaces with rational distances L met = { D q : q ∈ Q � 0 } Σ met : ¬ ( x � = y ∧ D 0 ( x , y )) ¬ D q ( x , x ) for every q ∈ Q s. t. q > 0 ¬ ( D p ( x , y ) ∧ D q ( y , x )) for all p , q ∈ Q � 0 s. t. p � = q ¬ ( D q 1 ( u 1 , v 1 ) ∧ . . . ∧ D q n ( u n , v n ) ∧ D q 0 ( u 0 , v 0 )) , for all q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n ∈ Q s. t. q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n > 0 and q 0 > q 1 + . . . + q n , and all possible choices ( u i , v i ) ∈ { ( x i − 1 , x i ) , ( x i , x i − 1 ) } where 1 ≤ i ≤ n and ( u 0 , v 0 ) ∈ { ( x 0 , x n ) , ( x n , x 0 ) } Uniform fillings: nontrivial, but obvious Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 11 / 23

  13. A negative example ( Q , < ) [up to 1-dim bi-interpretability] Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 12 / 23

  14. The small index property G = Aut ( F ) has the small index property if, for every H � G : H is open if and only if ( G : H ) < 2 ω Theorem. Assume that (A) holds and let K Σ be the Fra¨ ıss´ e limit of K Σ . Then K Σ has ample generic automorphisms, and therefore it has the small index property. cf. A. S. Kechris, C. Rosendal: Turbulence, amalgamation, and generic automorphisms of homogeneous structures, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 94 (2007) 302–350. Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 13 / 23

  15. The small index property Consequently, the following Fra¨ ıss´ e limits have the small index property: the random graph R (proved by W. Hodges, I. Hodkinson, D. Lascar, S. Shelah 1993), the Henson graph H m , m � 3 (proved by Herwig 1998), the edge-colored random graph over a countable set of colors I (if I is finite, the strong small index property was proved by Cameron and Tarzi), the random deterministic transition system over a countable set of transitions I , the random I -fuzzy graph, where I is a countable bounded meet-semilattice, the rational Urysohn space, and the Urysohn sphere of radius 1 (follows from the results of Kechris and Rosendal 2007, Solecki 2005). Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 14 / 23

  16. The Bergman property An infinite group G has the Bergman property if for any generating subset E ⊆ G such that 1 ∈ E = E − 1 we have G = E k for some positive integer k . Droste, G¨ obel 2005: strong uncountable cofinality ⇒ Bergman property Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 15 / 23

  17. The Bergman property Condition (A+) Assume that (A) holds, and that there is a uniform filling ( · ) ∗ : P Σ → K Σ such that: for all A , B , C , D ∈ K Σ such that C ∩ D = ∅ , if f : C ֒ → A and → B , then f ∪ g : ( C ⊔ D ) ∗ ֒ g : D ֒ → ( A ⊔ B ) ∗ ; and for all pairwise disjoint A , B , C ∈ K Σ we have (( A ⊔ B ) ∗ ⊔ C ) ∗ = ( A ⊔ ( B ⊔ C ) ∗ ) ∗ . Example. Metric spaces with rational distances do not fulfill (A+), but if the distances are bounded by 1, then (A+) holds. Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 16 / 23

  18. The Bergman property ıss´ Theorem. Assume that (A+) holds and let K Σ be the Fra¨ e limit of K Σ . Then Aut ( K Σ ) has [strong uncountable cofinality, and consequently] the Bergman property. cf. C. Rosendal: A topological version of the Bergman property, Forum Math. 21 (2009) 299–332. Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 17 / 23

  19. The Bergman property The automorphism groups of the following Fra¨ ıss´ e limits have the Bergman property: the random graph R (Kechris and Rosendal 2007), the Henson graph H m , m � 3 (Kechris and Rosendal 2007), the edge-colored random graph over a cntbl set of colors I , the random deterministic transition system over a countable set of transitions I , the random I -fuzzy graph, where I is a countable bounded meet-semilattice, and the Urysohn sphere of radius 1 (Rosendal 2009). Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 18 / 23

  20. A general probabilistic construction Recall: K Σ is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, so let K Σ be its Fra¨ ıss´ e limit. µ n ( · ) — prob measure on L n s. t. µ n ( R ) > 0 for all R ∈ L n We start with Φ 0 = ∅ ∈ P Σ Given a labeled L -structure Φ n ∈ P Σ with the base set { a 1 , . . . , a n } we construct Φ n + 1 ∈ K Σ ⊆ P Σ with the base set { a 1 , . . . , a n , a n + 1 } as follows. Dragan Maˇ sulovi´ c and Igor Dolinka (UNS) Labeled structures 17 Mar 2012 19 / 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend