propagators on curved spacetimes jan derezi nski in
play

PROPAGATORS ON CURVED SPACETIMES JAN DEREZI NSKI in collaboration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PROPAGATORS ON CURVED SPACETIMES JAN DEREZI NSKI in collaboration with DANIEL SIEMSSEN Dep. of Math. Meth. in Phys. Faculty of Physics University of Warsaw Consider a globally hyperbolic spacetime ( M, g ) . The KleinGordon


  1. PROPAGATORS ON CURVED SPACETIMES JAN DEREZI ´ NSKI in collaboration with DANIEL SIEMSSEN Dep. of Math. Meth. in Phys. Faculty of Physics University of Warsaw

  2. Consider a globally hyperbolic spacetime ( M, g µν ) . The Klein–Gordon operator with electromagnetic poten- tial A µ and a scalar potential (mass squared) Y is an operator acting on functions on M given by K := | g | − 1 1 | g | − 1 g µν | g | � � � � 4 ( x ) i ∂ µ + A µ ( x ) 2 ( x ) i ∂ ν + A ν ( x ) 4 ( x ) + Y ( x ) .

  3. We say that G is a bisolution of K if GK = KG = 0 . We say that G is an inverse (Green’s function or a fun- damental solution) if GK = KG = 1 l . I will discuss how to define distinguished bisolutions and inverses. I will call them propagators. (This word is often used in this context in quantum field theory).

  4. I will also discuss the problem of essential self-adjointness of the Klein-Gordon operator K on L 2 ( M ) for curved spacetimes. (Note that K is obviously Hermitian). Note that the analogous problem of the essential self- adjointness of the Laplace-Beltrami operator has a posi- tive answer for large classes of Riemannian manifolds.

  5. For generic Lorentzian manifolds the problem of self- adjointness of K seems rather difficult and is almost ab- sent from mathematical literature. It can be easily shown for static spacetimes (Siemssen and D.). Recently, a proof for asymptotically Minkowskian spaces was given (Vasy).

  6. On the other hand, in physical literature one can find many places where the authors tacitly assume that the Klein-Gordon operator is self-adjoint and write e.g. � ∞ 1 e i tK d t. K = − i 0 The method involving e i tK has a name: it is called the Fock-Schwinger proper time method.

  7. Let me summarize what every student of QFT learns about propagators on the Minkowski space R 1 ,d for the free Klein-Gordon operator K = p µ p µ + m 2 , where p µ = − i ∂ µ .

  8. We have the following standard Green’s functions: the forward/backward or advanced/retarded propagator 1 G ± := ( p 2 + m 2 ∓ i0sgn p 0 ) , the Feynman/anti-Feynman propagator 1 G F / F := ( p 2 + m 2 ∓ i0) . The former have an obvious application to the Cauchy problem. The Feynman propagator equals the expectation values of time-ordered products of fields and is used to evaluate Feynman diagrams.

  9. We have the following standard bisolutions: the Pauli-Jordan propagator G PJ := sgn( p 0 ) δ ( p 2 + m 2 ) , and the positive/negative frequency bisolution G (+) / ( − ) := θ ( ± p 0 ) δ ( p 2 + m 2 ) . The former expresses commutation relations of fields, and hence it is often called the commutator function. The positive frequency bisolution is the 2-point function of the vacuum state.

  10. It is well known that • the forward propagator G + , • the backward propagator G − , • the Pauli-Jordan propagator G PJ := G + − G − . are defined under very broad conditions on globally hy- perbolic spaces. All of them have a causal support. We will jointly call them classical propagators.

  11. We are however more interested in “non-classical prop- agators”, typical for quantum field theory. They are less known to pure mathematicians and more difficult to de- fine. They are • the Feynman propagator G F , • the anti-Feynman propagator G F , • the positive frequency bisolution G (+) , • the negative frequency bisolutions G ( − ) .

  12. There exists a well-known paper of Duistermat-H¨ ormander, which defined Feynman parametrices (a parametrix is an approximate inverse in appropriate sense). There exists a large literature devoted to the so-called Hadamard states, which can be interpreted as bisolu- tons with approximately positive frequencies. These are however large classes of propagators. We would like to have distinguished choices.

  13. It is helpful to introduce a time variable t , so that the spacetime is M = R × Σ . Assume that there are no time-space cross terms so that the metric can be written as x )d 2 t + g ij ( t, � x )d x i d x j . − g 00 ( t, � By conformal rescaling we can assume that g 00 = 1 , so that, setting V := A 0 , we have K = (i ∂ t + V ) 2 + L, L = −| g | − 1 1 2 g ij (i ∂ j + A j ) | g | − 1 4 + Y. 4 (i ∂ i + A i ) | g |

  14. We rewrite the Klein-Gordon equation as a 1st order equation given by ∂ t + i B ( t ) , where � � W ( t ) 1 l B ( t ) := , L ( t ) W ( t ) W ( t ) := V ( t ) + i 4 | g | ( t ) − 1 ∂ t | g | ( t ) .

  15. Denote by U ( t, t ′ ) the dynamics defined by B ( t ) , that is ∂ t U ( t, t ′ ) = − i B ( t ) U ( t, t ′ ) , U ( t, t ) = 1 l . Note that if � � E 11 E 12 E = E 21 E 22 is a bisolution/inverse of ∂ t + i B ( t ) , then E 12 is a bisolu- tion/inverse of K .

  16. The classical propagators can be easily expressed in terms of the dynamics: E PJ ( t, t ′ ) := U ( t, t ′ ) , E PJ 12 = − i G PJ ; E + ( t, t ′ ) := θ ( t − t ′ ) U ( t, t ′ ) , E + 12 = − i G + ; E − ( t, t ′ ) := − θ ( t ′ − t ) U ( t, t ′ ) , E − 12 = − i G − .

  17. We introduce the charge matrix � � 0 1 l Q := . 1 l 0 and the classical Hamiltonian � � L ( t ) W ( t ) H ( t ) := QB ( t ) = . W ( t ) 1 l We will assume that H ( t ) is positive and invertible.

  18. Assume now for a moment that the problem is static, so that L , V , B , H do not depend on time t . Clearly, U ( t, t ′ ) = e − i( t − t ′ ) B . The quadratic form H defines the so-called energy scalar product. It is easy to see that B is Hermitian in this prod- uct and has a gap in its spectrum around 0 . Let Π ( ± ) be the projections onto the positive/negative part of the spectrum of B .

  19. We define the positive and negative frequency bisolu- tions and the Feynman and anti-Feynman inverse on the level of ∂ t + i B ( t ) : E ( ± ) ( t, t ′ ) := ± e − i( t − t ′ ) B Π ( ± ) , E F ( t, t ′ ) := θ ( t − t ′ ) e − i( t − t ′ ) B Π (+) − θ ( t ′ − t ) e − i( t − t ′ ) B Π ( − ) , E F ( t, t ′ ) := θ ( t − t ′ ) e − i( t − t ′ ) B Π ( − ) − θ ( t ′ − t ) e − i( t − t ′ ) B Π (+) .

  20. They lead to corresponding propagators on the level of K : G ( ± ) := E ( ± ) 12 , G F := − i E F 12 , G F := − i E F 12 . They satisfy the relations G PJ = i G (+) − i G ( − ) , G F = i G (+) + G − = − i G ( − ) + G + , G F = − i G (+) + G + = − i G ( − ) + G − .

  21. Nonclassical propagators are important in quantum field theory, and they are often called 2-point functions, be- cause they are vacuum expectation values of free fields: G (+) ( x, y ) = Ω | ˆ φ ( x )ˆ � � φ ( y )Ω , G F ( x, y ) = − i � ˆ φ ( x )ˆ � � � Ω | T φ ( y ) Ω . G F is used to evaluate Feynman diagrams.

  22. It is easy to see that on a general spacetime the Klein- Gordon operator K is Hermitian (symmetric) on C ∞ c ( M ) in the sense of the Hilbert space L 2 ( M ) . In the static case, using Nelson’s Commutator Theorem one can show that it is essentially self-adjoint. 2 , the operator G F is bounded from Theorem. For s > 1 the space � t � − s L 2 ( M ) to � t � s L 2 ( M ) . Besides, in the sense of these spaces, ǫ ց 0 ( K − i ǫ ) − 1 = G F . s − lim

  23. Let 0 ≤ θ ≤ π . Suppose we replace the metric g by g θ := − e − 2i θ d t 2 + g Σ and the electric potential V by V θ := e − i θ V . This replace- The value θ = π ment is called Wick rotation. 2 corre- sponds to the Riemannian metric g π/ 2 = d t 2 + g Σ .

  24. The Wick rotated Klein-Gordon operator, which is elliptic and even invertible: K θ = e − i2 θ ( ∂ t + i V ) 2 + L, Theorem. For s > 1 2 , we have θ ց 0 K − 1 = G F , s − lim θ in the sense of operators from � t � − s L 2 ( M ) to � t � s L 2 ( M ) .

  25. Can one generalize non-classical propagators to non- static spacetimes? We will assume that the spacetime is close to being static and for large times it approaches a static spacetime sufficiently fast. In the non-static case we do not have a single energy space, because the Hamiltonian depends on time. We make technical assumptions that make possible to de- fine a Hilbertizable energy space in which the dynamics is bounded.

  26. One can define the incoming positive/negative frequency bisolution by cutting the phase space with the projections Π ( ± ) onto the positive/negative part of the spectrum of − Π (+) B ( −∞ ) . defines the vacuum state in the distant − past given by a vector Ω − . It corresponds to a prepara- tion of an experiment.

  27. Analogously, one can define the outgoing positive/negative bisolutions by using the projections Π ( ± ) onto the posi- + tive/negative part of the spectrum of B ( ∞ ) . They corre- spond to the vacuum state in the remote future given by a vector Ω + . This vector is related to the future measur- ments.

  28. The projection Π (+) −∞ can be transported by the dynamics to any time t , obtaining the projection Π (+) − ( t ) . Similarly we obtain the projection Π ( − ) + ( t ) . Using the fact that the dynamics is symplectic, one can show that for a large class of spacetimes for all t the subspaces Ran Π (+) Ran Π ( − ) − ( t ) , + ( t ) are complementary.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend