project development challenges and strategies
play

Project Development: Challenges and Strategies Northwest Gas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Project Development: Challenges and Strategies Northwest Gas Association 2016 Annual Energy Conference Molly Lawrence Mona Tandon Emily Pitlick Mallen June 10, 2016 1 AGENDA Challenges Facing FERC


  1. Project Development: 
 Challenges and Strategies 
 � Northwest Gas Association � 2016 Annual Energy Conference � Molly Lawrence � Mona Tandon � Emily Pitlick Mallen � � June 10, 2016 � 1

  2. AGENDA � ◘ Challenges Facing FERC Projects � ◘ Challenges under Federal Environmental Laws � ◘ Public Perception: Strategies and Solutions � 2

  3. Challenges Facing FERC Projects 
 � � Emily Pitlick Mallen � (202) 298 – 1859 � erp@vnf.com � � June 10, 2016 � 3

  4. 4

  5. The Role for FERC: Economic v. Environmental Oversight – A Brewing Conflict? � ◘ Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), 15 U.S.C. § 717f(c), provides authority to grant a authorize a pipeline project that is required by the public convenience and necessity. � ◘ Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4332(C), directs executive level Federal agencies to assess the environmental impact of a proposed major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. � 5

  6. Challenges to FERC’s Regulatory Role: 
 Tactics & Disruption � ◘ Interventions and Protests � • “Swamping” the FERC process through an unprecedented number of interventions and protests in virtually every FERC NGA § 7 certificate proceeding over the last year or more. � ◘ Litigation � • Repeated filing of judicial appeals and petitions for stay of NGA § 7 certificate by anti-fossil fuel advocates and landowners in order to prevent condemnation or construction � ◘ Petition for Rulemaking � • Environmental and consumer groups filed a petition asking FERC to implement 16 USC § 825q–1 by initiating a rulemaking to establish an Office of Public Participation. � ◘ Congressional Action � • Environmental groups want senators to issue a formal request to GAO to investigate FERC. Members of the New Hampshire Congressional Delegation sent a request to the Inspector General of the Department of Energy. � ◘ Obstruction and Civil Disobedience � • See pictures above � 6

  7. Legal Challenges to Pipeline Projects � ◘ Direct legal challenges to FERC certificates � • Myersville Citizens for a Rural Cmty., Inc. v. FERC, 783 F.3d 1301 (D.C. Cir. 2015). � ◘ Opposition to FERC NEPA process � • Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. FERC, 753 F.3d 1304 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (remanded on NEPA segmentation grounds). � • Gunpowder Riverkeeper v. FERC, 807 F.3d 267 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (NEPA claims dismissed). � 7

  8. Legal Challenges to Pipeline Projects � ◘ Procedural attacks on FERC � • In re Stop the Pipeline , No. 15-926 (2d Cir. Apr. 21, 2015) (writ of mandamus denied). � • In re: Clean Air Council , No. 15-2940 (3d Cir. Aug. 13, 2015) (writ of mandamus denied). � ◘ State permit challenges/State veto � • Constitution Pipeline Co. v. N.Y. State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation , No. 16-1568 (2d. Cir. filed May 16, 2016). � • Dominion Transmission, Inc. v. Town of Myersville Town Council, 982 F. Supp. 2d 570 (D. Md. 2013). � • Bosley v. Md. Dep’t of the Env’t , No. 03-C-14-5417, et. al . (Cir. Ct. Balt. Cnty. Apr. 30, 2015). � 8

  9. Legal Challenges to Pipeline Projects � ◘ Local opposition � • Minisink Residents for Environmental Preservation and Safety, et al. v. FERC , No. 12-1481 (D.C. Cir., Aug. 15, 2014). � • Millennium Pipeline Co ., 140 FERC ¶ 61,045, reh’g denied , 141 FERC ¶ 61,198 (2012) (two Comm’rs dissented on location of compressor station). � ◘ Post-certificate delay tactics � • See Constitution Pipeline proceeding (state permitting; tree clearing issues). � 9

  10. Challenges Under Federal Environmental Laws 
 � � Molly Lawrence � Partner � (206) 802-3836 � mol@vnf.com � � June 10, 2016 � 10

  11. NEPA Environmental Review Process �� • Project Description / Purpose and Need � • Level of Review (Cat Ex, EA or EIS) � • Reasonable Range of Reasonable Alternatives � • Connected Actions, Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts �� • Public Participation � • “Hard Look” Standard of Review � 11

  12. T&E Species and Critical Habitat � • ESA Section 7 and Section 9 Obligations � • Section 7 Consultation � Requirements � • Emerging Issues � • Candidate Species Reviews & Listing � • Trend toward voluntary conservation efforts to avoid listing � • Migratory Bird Treaty Act � • Bald and Golden Eagle Act � 12

  13. Crossing Waters � • Clean Water Act 404 Permits � • NWP or Individual Permit � • Use of multiple NWPs � • Trigger one IP and . . . � • Cumulative impacts � • General and Regional Permit Conditions � • 401 Water Quality Certification � • Pending change to WOTUS � • Floodplain crossings � • Executive Order 13690 � • ESA Compliance � 13

  14. Cultural Resources � • National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultations � • Integrate with NEPA? � • Identifying cultural resources � • Resolving “Adverse Effects”: Memorandums of Agreement and Programmatic Agreements � • Crossing “Tribal Lands” � • Inadvertent Discovery Plans � 14

  15. Public Perception: 
 Strategies & Solutions 
 � Mona Tandon � Partner � (202) 298-1886 � mxt@vnf.com � � June 10, 2016 � 15

  16. Public Opposition � 16

  17. Public Opposition � 17

  18. Public Perception: Reasons To Oppose Pipelines � ◘ 1. Safety standards don’t protect people. � � ◘ 2. Accidents are inevitable. � ◘ 3. Pipelines = lower property values. � ◘ 4. Difficulties selling homes and property. � ◘ 5. Fracking accelerates climate change. � 18

  19. Public Perception: Reasons To Oppose Pipelines (cont) � ◘ 6. Gas is not for America. � ◘ 7. Exporting shale gas = increased energy bills. � ◘ 8. Fracking blocks transition to renewable energy. � ◘ 9. Pipelines do not create many local jobs. � ◘ 10. Pipelines don’t bring tax-revenue windfalls. � 19

  20. Strategies & Solutions � ◘ BE PROACTIVE! � • Political campaign approach � ◘ Routing � ◘ Early Outreach � • Be the first to create your story � • Understand your stakeholders � ◘ Information � • Statistics � • Project benefits � • Social Justice � ◘ What is the stakeholders’ stake in the project? � ◘ Social media � ◘ Partner with different industries � 20

  21. Independent Petroleum Association of America’s � Energy In Depth Campaign � www.energyindepth.org � 21

  22. Questions? � 22

  23. For more information: � www.vnf.com � � � � Molly Lawrence � Emily P. Mallen � Mona Tandon � 206-623-9372 � 202-298-1859 � 202-298-1886 � erp@vnf.com � mol@vnf.com � mxt@vnf.com � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend