1
Procurement Division Evaluation by Best Value for Money Methodology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Procurement Division Evaluation by Best Value for Money Methodology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Procurement Division Evaluation by Best Value for Money Methodology 1 Best Value for Money Best value principle as per UN Financial Regulations & Rules: 5.12 Due consideration when exercising the procurement function Move from
2
Best Value for Money
- Best value principle as per UN Financial Regulations &
Rules: 5.12
– Due consideration when exercising the procurement function
- Move from a principle to a method to apply best value in
procurement
- Best value in procurement is a practice used world wide in
public and international procurement operations
- Best value method involves all procurement stakeholders
– Requisitioner – Procurement Staff – LCC – HCC – Contract Approving Authority
3
Best Value for Money
- Requisition must describe the goods and/or service in
terms of functionality, deliverable, business solution
– No specification or “how to do it” – Must be outcome based
- Procurement under best value for money method is
based on pre-established criteria for evaluation with weighted scores assigned to technical and commercial evaluation
- Information about criteria is communicated to the
vendors at the solicitation phase
- Range assigned to technical evaluation varies from 40-
50-60% and 60-50-40% is assigned to financial / commercial evaluation
– Allocation is determined by market structure, objectives to achieve, professional judgment and risk assessment
4
Best Value for Money
- After receipt of proposal, technical
evaluation is conducted by a team of staff from the requisitioning office(s)
- Based on the pre-established criteria,
technical offers are rated with points assigned to each category of criteria
- The best technical offer receives the
highest score
5
Best Value for Money
- For example, technical evaluation of specific
equipment may include evaluation criteria such as:
- Pass or Fail (ISO certification)
- Delivery lead time (15 points)
- Fuel consumption rate (20 points)
- Warranty conditions (15 points)
- Noise level (10 points)
- Power capacity output (15 points)
- Global support for spare parts (25 points)
- Total = 100 pts and will count for 60% of the overall
evaluation
6
Best Value for Money
- Financial evaluation is conducted by the
Procurement Division upon completion of technical evaluation
- Lowest priced offer is given the maximum
number of points. All other financial and commercial elements receive points in inverse proportion
- Total = 100 pts and will count for 40% of
the overall evaluation
7
Best Value for Money
- For example, in the scenario below, company
A offering the second lowest price is the best value based on the combination of technical and financial evaluation having the highest total score
Technical Evaluation (60%) Commercial Evaluation (40%) Total Score Score (A) Adjusted Score (B) Price (C) Score (D) (B) + (D) A 90.0 54.0 $230,000 38.3 92.3 B 70.0 42.0 $280,000 31.4 73.4 C 85.0 51.0 $220,000 40.0 91.0 D 88.0 52.8 $240,000 36.7 89.5
8
Best Value for Money Statistic
- In 2004 and 2005, a total of 117 tenders were
processed under the best value for money evaluation method for a total contract value of $738 million
- Corrigendum to paragraph 66 of A/60/846/Add.5 will be
issued
- 117 tenders represents approximately 13% of
total number of tenders issued in 2004 and 2005
- Note of caution:
– Difference in contract award value and actual expenses (system contract)
- Certain contract value do not expense 100%
9
Conclusion
- Best value for money is a principle set in
FR&R
- Best value for money, for the procurement