Procurement Board Presentation April 21, 2015 Allan I. Pack, Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

procurement board
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Procurement Board Presentation April 21, 2015 Allan I. Pack, Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Procurement Board Presentation April 21, 2015 Allan I. Pack, Chief Financial Officer Subramanian Muniasamy, Chief Information Officer Andrew Ratner, Marketing and Outreach Director Jonathan Kromm, Deputy Executive Director A service of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A service of Maryland Health Benefit Exchange

April 21, 2015 Allan I. Pack, Chief Financial Officer Subramanian Muniasamy, Chief Information Officer Andrew Ratner, Marketing and Outreach Director Jonathan Kromm, Deputy Executive Director

Procurement Board Presentation

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Procurement Procedures
  • Procurement Calendar
  • IDIQ RFP
  • Marketing RFP

1

Scope of Presentation

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Procurement Decision Tree
  • 2. Procurement Checklists to Accompany All New Procurements
  • 3. Procurement Document Checklists
  • 4. New Filing System

2

Four New Procurement Products

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Decision Tree (see attachment) will serve as a blueprint for prospective

contract monitors on how to proceed with prospective procurements.

  • MHBE’s procurement policy is modeled largely on the Board of Public Works’

procurement policy and procedures, and the decision tree will help contract monitors ensure they are following all necessary steps and processing all necessary documents.

  • Next Steps: Fully implementing new system and updating decision tree and

process to incorporate all procurement methods, e.g. intergovernmental cooperative purchasing agreements.

3

Procurement Decision Tree

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Bid & Proposal Checklists (see attachments) will prescribe for prospective

contract monitors exactly how to proceed for each step of the procurement process

  • The procurement process will be broken into 5 distinct stages:
  • Pre-RFP Issuance
  • RFP Issuance & Post RFP Issuance
  • Bid & Proposal Evaluation Process
  • Pre-Board Approval Process
  • Post-Approval Process
  • The Checklist will not only serve as a blueprint but will also be required to be

signed by executive management at various stages of the procurement process and retained in the procurement files, i.e. prior to Board submission.

4

Bid & Proposal Checklists to Accompany all New Procurements

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Document Checklists (see attachments) will prescribe for prospective contract

monitors what documentation is required at each stage of the procurement, following the same 5 prong procurement process as laid out in the Bid & Proposal process (i.e. Pre-RFP Issuance, RFP Issuance & Post RFP Issuance, Bid & Proposal Evaluation Process, Pre-Board Approval Process, and the Post- Approval Process)

  • The Document Checklist will also accompany the Bid & Proposals Checklist

such that it will help substantiate the attainment of required signatures by executive management at various stages of the procurement process. All documentation, even documentation not required must be addressed.

5

Procurement Document Checklist

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • In order to make all documents relevant to a particular procurement easily

and readily located and retrievable, MHBE will institute a more streamlined filing system. This new system will help facilitate and expedite the Agency’s fulfillment of reporting obligations, media requests, public information act requests, and basic inquiries.

  • The new filing system will be organized according to the original solicitation

number and will follow the same structure as laid out in the Bid & Proposal and Document Checklist processes, namely Pre-RFP Issuance, RFP Issuance & Post RFP Issuance, Bid & Proposal Evaluation Process, Pre-Board Approval Process, and the Post-Approval Process). This will ensure uniformity in filing and that all aspects of the procurement process mirror one another.

6

New System Filing System

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Procurement Calendar

7

Contract Name Vendor Name Dollar Amount Period of Performance

  • Start Date

Period of Performance - End Date Options PMO Standard Contract Extension Arkenstone Technologies $362,000.00 1/1/2015 12/31/2015 Yes PMO Staff Augmentation Support for MHBE (IDIQ) Cognizant Technology Solutions, Inc. $500,000.00 7/10/2014 6/30/2015 Yes Gap Analysis & Transfer HBX Solution Deloitte Consulting, LLP $43,967,081.00 4/2/2014 6/30/2015 No Software Licenses Deloitte Consulting, LLP $14,140,428.73 6/4/2014 6/4/2017 No Task Order 3a - M&O & Level I & II Support Deloitte Consulting, LLP $15,334,289.00 11/12/2014 6/30/2016 No Task Order 2a - Deloitte Lease Deloitte Consulting, LLP $1,673,838.00 6/27/2014 10/31/2018 No Consent To Sublease Exelon Business Service $2,665,545.85 12/21/2012 12/31/2017 No Training Curriculum and Delivery - 3rd Contract Mod GP Strategies (No Cost Extension) $5,863,225.13 1/1/2015 6/16/2015 No PMO Staff Augmentation Support for MHBE (IDIQ) Infojini, Inc. $500,000.00 7/10/2014 6/30/2015 Yes Three Party Escrow Service Agreement Iron Mountain $8,400.00 3/28/2014 3/27/2016 No PMO Contract Extension Mod 2

  • J. Cain & Company., LLC

$1,315,800.00 1/1/2015 12/31/2015 Yes

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Procurement Calendar Cont.

8

Contract Name Vendor Name Dollar Amount Period of Performance - Start Date Period of Performance - End Date Options PMO Staff Augmentation Support for MHBE (IDIQ) Koniag Services, Inc. $500,000.00 7/10/2014 6/30/2015 Yes PMO Staff Augmentation Support for MHBE (IDIQ) Libertas Consulting LLC $500,000.00 7/10/2014 6/30/2015 Yes PMO Staff Augmentation Support for MHBE (IDIQ) Matrix Ssystems & Technologies, Inc. $500,000.00 7/10/2014 6/30/2015 Yes Consolidated Service Center Maximus Health Services, Inc. $68,579,855.67 6/3/2013 12/31/2017 No Enterprise Content Management System Service Services Contract Maximus Health Services, Inc. $2,392,891.00 9/27/2013 9/30/2016 No PMO Consulting Services Contract Extension Mod 2 Navigators Management Partners $5,242,000.00 1/1/2015 12/31/2015 Yes Customer Relationship Software Oracle America, Inc. $1,562,220.00 7/17/2013 7/16/2018 No MD HBX System and Workflow Development Scan-Optics $850,000.00 7/15/2014 7/14/2015 No Outsourced Printing and Mailing Services Sir Speedy $810,000.00 7/14/2014 7/13/2015 No System and Data Security Services Support Consultant - MOD 5 TMI $298,200.00 1/1/2015 12/31/2015 Yes Full Service Communications and Marketing Services to Supports the MHBE Contract Mod 5 Weber Shandwick $4,394,039.00 7/1/2014 6/30/2015 No Production Data Center Hosting Xerox State and Local Solutions, LLC $30,232,338.65 6/1/2014 5/31/2019 Yes

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity
  • Used when the precise quantity of services cannot be

determined

  • Allows for a selected group of bidders to provide resources at

pre-determined rates, as needed

  • Services or resources are procured via task orders using very

prescriptive and precise requirements for a specific period of time

  • Only utilize the contract when specific needs arise
  • Attracts Minority Business and Women-owned Business

Enterprises

  • Limited to $500,000 Not to Exceed (NTE) annually

What is the IDIQ Contract?

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • The services performed by IDIQ would include the following

– IT Support

  • QA Testing
  • Data Analysis
  • System Development
  • Security/Network
  • Training Specialist
  • Project Management

– Operations Support

  • Data Matching
  • Process Improvement
  • Escalated Case processing

Scope of Services

10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What Positions Have We Procured So Far?

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What are the Benefits?

  • IDIQ contracts are cost-effective, as they are used on-

demand only.

  • IDIQ contracts can quickly staff positions on a short-term,

immediate basis at a pre-determined cost, creating tight spending controls.

  • IDIQ contracts are specifically defined with fixed durations

and rates / cost limits.

  • IDIQ contracts attract a variety of consulting firms, of all

sizes and designations, including local MBE / WBE entities. This variety drives costs lower for the Exchange, resulting in high quality resources at affordable rates.

12

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Next Steps

13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Original Guiding Principles for MHC Marketing Plan

1. Bring Everyone Along: Although not everyone in the State is affected by health reform, every

  • pinion matters. The campaign’s core efforts will focus on enrollment of the key target

audiences, while opinion leaders, elected officials, media and the general public also must be educated and their support cultivated 2. Leverage the Power of Partnerships: Maximize education and enrollment by leveraging existing resources, networks and channels; identify opportunities for collaboration and partnerships with common visions and missions 3. Segment Audiences and Customize Communications: Develop marketing and communications tactics based on research and evidence of how different populations can best be reached and encouraged to enroll and retain coverage; ensure materials are culturally and linguistically appropriate 4. Educate to Ensure Delivery of the Consumer Experience: Comprehensive information and education is necessary for assisters and partners to provide a seamless consumer experience 5. Evaluate and Adjust Campaign Strategies: Monitor and modify based on feedback from stakeholders, partners, ongoing research, program metrics and national indicators

14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Additional Guiding Principles for MHC Marketing Plan

  • 6. Reaching the Hard-To-Reach: Maryland has enrolled about 25% of the potential market,

ranking 10th of the 14 state exchanges. (* “Now the Hard Part: The Rate of Health Care Enrollment Seems Set to Slow,” New York Times, March 23, 2015)

  • 7. Retaining Customers: Communications and outreach are vital to help retain customers

already served through MarylandHealthConnection.gov, in part by improving information such as what to do “After You Enroll,” so consumers know how to use their policies to improve their health.

15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

OE2: Campaign Highlights

  • 289,000 enrolled 11/15/14 to 2/28/15
  • 122,000 in private Qualified Health Plans (double the total a year earlier,

10/1/13 to 3/31/15)

  • 1.7 million unique visitors to website during OE2. 500,000 users of

enrollment application on website

  • New website -- faster, easier to use, more functional. New pages

highlighted availability of financial help, post-enrollment information

  • Designed to appeal to consumers ages 18 to 35 with greater integration
  • f growing social channels
  • Advertising strategy was centered on promoting 23 major enrollment

events across Maryland with local cable, broadcast, print media

16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

“The second year of Maryland’s health insurance marketplace was much more successful than its first.” “The turnaround in Maryland since the last time may be even more striking than the improvements to HealthCare.gov.” “Maryland redeemed itself ... the ‘Comeback Kid.’” “The exchange's improvements this year extend to its data collection and analysis.”

OE2: Public Relations

“If there was a most-improved public HIX award, Maryland Health Connection certainly would be in the running for such an honor. “Maryland increases QHP enrollments by 89% over 2014 ... Holy Smokes ... This broke not

  • nly the HHS Dept's official target

for Maryland (88K) as well as my

  • wn original target (105K), but

even my recently upgraded target (115K).”

17

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18

OE2: Digital Retargeting

  • Retargeting (also known as behavioral remarketing or behavioral retargeting) is a

form of online advertising aimed at consumers based on their previous Internet actions that earlier did not result in a sale or conversion.

  • Helped drive key constituencies such as Females 34-65 (potential enrollees and

their moms), Asians, Latinos, uninsured African Americans to click into the enrollment application, sometimes days or even weeks after they first visited the website at rates 3 or 4 times higher than typically seen in the overall insurance industry.

  • 65% watched MHC testimonial videos on YouTube completely to concluding

tagline -- more than triple industry standard of 20%.

  • Online ad that was most successful in leading African Americans and Hispanics to

click "Enroll Now" depicted a black woman and her grown son with a "budget- friendly" message -- affordability is key.

  • Helped drive 41,601 to “Enroll Now” button on website, 8% of total 539,654 who
  • pened web enrollment application.
slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Paid social media

advertising on Facebook and Twitter helped reach a large audience of young invincibles and their parents.

  • Drove more than 25,000

clicks to the website (September to April)

  • Communicated major

deadlines and updates

  • Provided key info on using

your health coverage

19

OE2: Social Advertising

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

OE2: Adam Jones radio ad

Adam Jones retweet (left) to his 170,000 Twitter folllowers

  • Collaboration with the Maryland Citizens'

Health Initiative Education Fund

  • Positive media coverage in Baltimore

Sun, WBAL-TV, WJZ-TV, WMAR-TV, Baltimore Business Journal

  • Visitors to website the 1/31/15 weekend of

Jones ad/press conference increased by 2,000, or 14%, over prior weekend.

  • Website conversions from MHC ad on

Pandora spiked after Oriole ad began to 1,193, up from 228 the day prior.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The State Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC) at the University of Minnesota, DHMH and MHBE map and data professionals are analyzing enrollment and demographic data and other indices such as Maryland Health Enterprise Zones to help MHC more precisely target outreach for OE3.

21

OE3: Data Mapping

slide-23
SLIDE 23

How Maryland’s Uninsured Consume Media

  • Listen to Pandora: 95.7%
  • Heavy exposure to Internet: 180+ minutes a day
  • Mobile Internet: 87.7%
  • Home Internet: 51.2%
  • Smartphone owners: 86%
  • Cell phone texting: 86%
  • Don’t read the newspaper: 72.1%
  • Listen to weekday radio: 70.8%
  • Watch TV between 6-8 p.m.: 64.8%

(Source: The Media Audit, Weber Shandwick, 2013)

22

slide-24
SLIDE 24

OE3: Proposed Changes in Scope

23

CATEGORIES IN ORIGINAL CONTRACT CHANGES FOR OE3 CONTRACT

  • 1. MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS

STRATEGY SUPPORT Contract would run through June 30, 2016 with the

  • ption for an additional two-year extension.
  • 2. ADVERTISING CREATIVE SERVICES

Reusing TV Creative with some retagging as needed; Cut focus groups from 6 to 3

  • 3. MEDIA PLANNING AND BUYING

Smaller general media buy Targeted to align with hard-to-reach strategy

  • 4. PUBLIC RELATIONS

Cut; brought in-house

  • 5. ONLINE MARKETING/DIGITAL DESIGN

More video and graphics produced in-house

  • 6. SOCIAL MEDIA

Large reductions in contract; added staff position and production capabilities in-house

  • 7. EDUCATION AND OUTREACH -- CORPORATE

AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAMS Will work closely with in-house outreach coordinator to focus on the implementation of a statewide plan

  • 8. COLLATERAL DEVELOPMENT

Reuse basic designs from OE1 and OE2 wherever possible so less agency creative time is logged. Printing and Production not included, as before.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

OE3: Reuse/Repurpose OE2 Creative Campaign

24

slide-26
SLIDE 26

OE3: Challenges / Opportunities

25

Continued lack of awareness and confusion among the general public, especially in hard-to-reach geographies in the state farther from prime media

  • markets. Need for a tax-

related special enrollment period both in Maryland and throughout most of the country after the close of

  • pen enrollment was one

symptom of that. The remaining market has great potential. But the cost and difficulty in reaching the next group will be greater than the earlier open enrollments where people in need were most hungry for the coverage opportunity. Create/build awareness for the SHOP marketplace for employers.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

OE3: Bridging Awareness Gap

26

According to the Urban Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, in a December 2014 phone survey conducted across the country of uninsured adults, ages 18 to 64, with family incomes above 100 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) who were most likely to be subject to a penalty for lacking health coverage, 25% said they had heard nothing about a penalty. According to focus groups conducted in fall 2014 for the Maryland Citizens' Health Initiative Education Fund, awareness of MHC varied

  • greatly. Focus groups in Easton

and Suburban Baltimore exhibited “absolutely no awareness of Maryland Health Connection – nor of the impending open enrollment on

  • Nov. 15. They did have a high

awareness of the Affordable Care Act, and most were aware

  • f their obligations to enroll in

coverage or face a penalty.” In an August 2014 telephone survey of 800 Maryland residents by KRC Research for Maryland Health Connection, only 37% responded they were very or somewhat familiar with the Maryland health insurance marketplace. Respondents who said they were unfamiliar ranged as high as 54% in Western Maryland.