probabilistic and
play

Probabilistic and Model Fusion: . . . Model Fusion: . . . Interval - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Data Fusion under . . . Data Fusion under . . . New Problem: . . . Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion Probabilistic and Model Fusion: . . . Model Fusion: . . . Interval Uncertainty Model Fusion: Interval . . . Model Fusion:


  1. Data Fusion under . . . Data Fusion under . . . New Problem: . . . Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion Probabilistic and Model Fusion: . . . Model Fusion: . . . Interval Uncertainty Model Fusion: Interval . . . Model Fusion: Interval . . . of the Results Model Fusion: Interval . . . Preliminary Experiments Acknowledgments of Data Fusion, Home Page with Application Title Page to Geosciences ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Christian Servin 1 , Omar Ochoa 1 , Page 1 of 13 and Aaron A. Velasco 2 1 Department of Computer Science Go Back 2 Department of Geological Sciences Full Screen University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, TX 79968, USA Close contact christians@miners.utep.edu Quit

  2. New Problem: . . . 1. Data Fusion under Interval Uncertainty: Re- Why This Is Important minder New Idea: Model Fusion Model Fusion: . . . • Frequent practical situation: Model Fusion: . . . – we are interested in a quantity u ; Model Fusion: Interval . . . – we have several measurements and/or expert esti- Model Fusion: Interval . . . mates u 1 , . . . , u n of u . Model Fusion: Interval . . . Preliminary Experiments • Objective: fuse these estimates into a single more ac- Acknowledgments curate estimate. Home Page • Interval case: each u i is known with interval uncer- Title Page tainty. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Formal description: for each i , we know the interval ◭ ◮ u i = [ u i − ∆ i , u i + ∆ i ] containing u . � n Page 2 of 13 def • Solution: u belongs to the intersection u = u i of Go Back i =1 these intervals. Full Screen Close

  3. New Problem: . . . 2. Data Fusion under Probabilistic Uncertainty: Why This Is Important Reminder New Idea: Model Fusion Model Fusion: . . . def • Probabilistic uncertainty: each measurement error ∆ u i = Model Fusion: . . . u i − u is normally distributed w/0 mean and known σ i . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • Technique: the Least Squares Method (LSM) Model Fusion: Interval . . . n � ( u − u i ) 2 Model Fusion: Interval . . . → min . 2 σ 2 Preliminary Experiments i i =1 Acknowledgments • Resulting estimate: is Home Page � n u i · σ − 2 Title Page i i =1 u = . � n ◭◭ ◮◮ σ − 2 i i =1 ◭ ◮ • Standard deviation: Page 3 of 13 1 σ 2 = with σ 2 ≪ σ 2 , i . � Go Back n σ − 2 i Full Screen i =1 Close

  4. New Problem: . . . 3. New Problem: Different Resolution Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Traditional data fusion: fusing measurement results Model Fusion: . . . with different accuracy. Model Fusion: . . . • Additional problem: different measurements also have Model Fusion: Interval . . . different resolution. Model Fusion: Interval . . . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • Case study – geosciences: estimating density u 1 , . . . , u n at different locations and depths. Preliminary Experiments Acknowledgments • Examples of different geophysical estimates: Home Page – Seismic data leads to higher-resolution estimates Title Page u n of the density values. � u 1 , . . . , � ◭◭ ◮◮ – Gravity data leads to lower-resolution estimates, ◭ ◮ i.e., estimates � u for the weighted average Page 4 of 13 � n u = w i · u i . Go Back i =1 Full Screen Close

  5. New Problem: . . . 4. Why This Is Important Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Reminder: there are many sources of data for Earth Model Fusion: . . . models: Model Fusion: . . . – first-arrival passive seismic data Model Fusion: Interval . . . (from the actual earthquakes), Model Fusion: Interval . . . – first-arrival active seismic data Model Fusion: Interval . . . (from the seismic experiments), Preliminary Experiments – gravity data, Acknowledgments Home Page – surface waves, etc. Title Page • At present: each of these datasets is processed sepa- rately, resulting in several different Earth models. ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • Fact: these models often provide complimentary geo- physical information. Page 5 of 13 • Idea: all these models describe the properties of the Go Back same Earth, so it is desirable to combine them. Full Screen Close

  6. New Problem: . . . 5. New Idea: Model Fusion Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Objective: to combine the information contained in Model Fusion: . . . multiple complementary datasets. Model Fusion: . . . • Ideal approach: it is desirable to come up with tech- Model Fusion: Interval . . . niques for joint inversion of these datasets. Model Fusion: Interval . . . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • Problem: designing such joint inversion techniques is an important theoretical and practical challenge. Preliminary Experiments Acknowledgments • Status: such joint inversion methods are being devel- Home Page oped. Title Page • Practical question: what to do while these methods are ◭◭ ◮◮ being developed? ◭ ◮ • Our practical solution: fuse the Earth models coming from different datasets. Page 6 of 13 Go Back Full Screen Close

  7. New Problem: . . . 6. Model Fusion: Statistical Case Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Objective: find the values u 1 , . . . , u n of the desired quan- Model Fusion: . . . tity in different spatial cells. Model Fusion: . . . • Geophysical example: u i is the density at different Model Fusion: Interval . . . Model Fusion: Interval . . . 1 km × 1 km × 1 km cells . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • Input: we have Preliminary Experiments Acknowledgments – high-resolution measurements, i.e., values � u i ≈ u i Home Page with st. dev. σ i ; u ( k ) cor- Title Page – lower-resolution measurements, i.e., values � responding to blocks of neighboring cells: ◭◭ ◮◮ � u ( k ) ≈ w ( k ) · u i , with st. dev. σ ( k ) . ◭ ◮ � i i Page 7 of 13 • Additional information: a lower-resolution measure- Go Back ment result is representative of values within the block. Full Screen Close

  8. New Problem: . . . 7. Model Fusion: Statistical Case (cont-d) Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Formal description: when w ( k ) u ( k ) ≈ u i , � = 0, we have � i Model Fusion: . . . with st. dev. δ ( k ) . Model Fusion: . . . • How to estimate δ ( k ) : as the empirical st. dev. within Model Fusion: Interval . . . the block. Model Fusion: Interval . . . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • High-resolution values (reminder): � u i ≈ u i w/st. dev. σ i . Preliminary Experiments • Lower-resolution values (reminder): Acknowledgments � u ( k ) ≈ w ( k ) · u i , with st. dev. σ ( k ) . � Home Page i i Title Page • LSM Solution: minimize the sum ◭◭ ◮◮ u ( k ) − � w ( k ) · u i ) 2 ( � � � � � i u i ) 2 u ( k ) ) 2 ◭ ◮ ( u i − � ( u i − � i + + . σ 2 ( δ ( k ) ) 2 ( σ ( k ) ) 2 Page 8 of 13 i i i k k • How: differentiating w.r.t. u i , we get a system of linear Go Back equations with unknowns u 1 , . . . , u n . Full Screen Close

  9. New Problem: . . . 8. Model Fusion: Interval Case Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Quantities of interest: values u 1 , . . . , u n of the desired Model Fusion: . . . quantity in different spatial cells. Model Fusion: . . . • Objective: find the ranges u 1 , . . . , u n of possible values Model Fusion: Interval . . . of u 1 , . . . , u n . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • High-resolution measurements: values � u i ≈ u i with Model Fusion: Interval . . . bound ∆ i : Preliminary Experiments u i − ∆ i ≤ u i ≤ � � u i + ∆ i . Acknowledgments Home Page u ( k ) correspond- • Lower-resolution measurements: values � ing to blocks of neighboring cells: Title Page � u ( k ) ≈ w ( k ) · u i , with bound ∆ ( k ) . ◭◭ ◮◮ � i i ◭ ◮ • Resulting constraint: Page 9 of 13 � u ( k ) + ∆ ( k ) . u ( k ) − ∆ ( k ) ≤ w ( k ) � · u i ≤ � Go Back i i Full Screen Close

  10. New Problem: . . . 9. Model Fusion: Interval Case (cont-d) Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Additional information: a priori bounds on u i : Model Fusion: . . . u i ≤ u i ≤ u i . Model Fusion: . . . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • Additional information: a priori bounds on the changes Model Fusion: Interval . . . between neighboring cells: Model Fusion: Interval . . . − δ ij ≤ u i − u j ≤ δ ij . Preliminary Experiments Acknowledgments • High-resolution measurements (reminder): Home Page � u i − ∆ i ≤ u i ≤ � u i + ∆ i . Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ • Lower-resolution measurements (reminder): � u ( k ) − ∆ ( k ) ≤ u ( k ) + ∆ ( k ) . ◭ ◮ w ( k ) � · u i ≤ � i Page 10 of 13 i • Objective: minimize and maximize each u i under these Go Back constraints. Full Screen Close

  11. New Problem: . . . 10. Model Fusion: Interval Solution Why This Is Important New Idea: Model Fusion • Problem. Minimize (Maximize) u i under the following Model Fusion: . . . constraints: Model Fusion: . . . • u i ≤ u i ≤ u i . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • − δ ij ≤ u i − u j ≤ δ ij . Model Fusion: Interval . . . Model Fusion: Interval . . . • � u i − ∆ i ≤ u i ≤ � u i + ∆ i . u ( k ) − ∆ ( k ) ≤ � u ( k ) + ∆ ( k ) . w ( k ) Preliminary Experiments • � · u i ≤ � i Acknowledgments i Home Page • Current solution method: linear programming. Title Page • Objective: provide more efficient algorithms for specific geophysical cases. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Preliminary results: some such algorithms have been ◭ ◮ developed. Page 11 of 13 Go Back Full Screen Close

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend