privacy expectations and preferences in an iot world
play

Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World Pardis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World Pardis Emami-Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Martin Degeling, Hana Habib, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Norman Sadeh PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 1 PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT


  1. Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World Pardis Emami-Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Martin Degeling, Hana Habib, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Norman Sadeh PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 1

  2. PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 2

  3. Do you know: § What are they collecting? § Who are they sharing your data with? § For how long are they keeping your data? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 3

  4. Now imagine the future § What are they collecting? § Who are they sharing my data with? § For how long are they keeping my data? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 4

  5. Design questions § Informing people about data collections • What should we notify people about? § Giving some choices to control privacy • What factors make people comfortable? • What factors make people allow/deny a data collection? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 5

  6. Design questions § Making the system automated • How well can we predict people preferences? PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 6

  7. Vignette study § Capture wide range of scenarios § Stories about individuals, situations and structures which can make reference to important points in the study of perceptions, beliefs and attitudes (Hughes 1998) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 7

  8. Scenarios varied by 8 factors • Type of data collected • Location of data collection • Device collecting data • Retention time • Purpose of data collection • Who benefits from data collection • Whether or not data is shared • Whether more info could be inferred PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 8

  9. Example scenario § You are at [work] . This building has [cameras] that are recording [video of the entire building] . The video is [shared with law enforcement] to [improve public safety] and they [will not delete it] . PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 9

  10. Example scenario § You are at a [department store] . This store has an [iris scanner] that scans customers' irises automatically as they enter the store in order to [remotely identify returning customers] . Your iris scan will be kept for [one week] . PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 10

  11. Studied 380 IoT scenarios 14 126,720 380 No nonsense 14 scenarios scenarios 14 PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 11

  12. Our participants § 1007 Mechanical Turk participants § From the United States § Avg. age: 35.3 § ~15 minutes to complete PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 12

  13. Questions per scenario § I would want my mobile phone to notify me [every time / only the first time / every once in a while] this data collection occurs. • five point scale from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree” PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 13

  14. Questions per scenario § How would you feel about the data collection in the situation described above if you were given no additional information about the scenario? • five point scale from “very comfortable to “very uncomfortable” § If you had the choice, would you allow or deny this data collection? • Choices: allow, deny PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 14

  15. Model selection § GLMM + random intercept § Backward elimination PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 15

  16. Model: Every time notification § Most impactful explanatory factor: • Biometrics for an unspecified purpose (coef: 0.88, 61%) • Presence for a not beneficial purpose (coef: -0.49, 27%) § Least impactful explanatory factor: • data collected at a department store (coef: -0.69, 42%) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 16

  17. Model: Comfort level § Most impactful explanatory factor: • Video collection happening today (coef: 1.39, 69%) • Biometrics (coef: -1.45, 28%) § Least impactful explanatory factor: • Data being kept forever (coef: 0.10, 48%) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 17

  18. Model: Desire to Allow/Deny § Most impactful explanatory factor: • Video collected at department store (coef: -0.9, 66%) • Presence collected at work (coef: 2.11, 36%) § Least impactful explanatory factor: • Data being shared (coef: 0.52, 45%) PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 18

  19. Prediction accuracy § Comfort level: • ~81% § Desire to allow or deny: • ~79% PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 19

  20. Preferences in a nutshell § Anonymous data types “I’d be fine with data that doesn’t identify me.” § Public vs. private “[I would be] comfortable with public spaces, absolutely not comfortable in my home.” PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 20

  21. Preferences in a nutshell § Ranked 1 st = Type of data + X • Notification X = user perceived benefit • comfort X = happening today • allow/deny X = location PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 21

  22. Our results design § Design personalized privacy systems § In progress: experience sampling More info: www.privacyassistant.org Pardis Emami-Naeini , Sruti Bhagavatula, Martin Degeling, Hana Habib, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Norman Sadeh PERSONALIZED PRIVACY ASSISTANT PROJECT 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend