Primordial Black Holes in Cosmology Lecture 3 : Constraints on their existence
Massimo Ricotti (University of Maryland, USA)
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona 23/10/2017
Primordial Black Holes in Cosmology Lecture 3 : Constraints on their - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Primordial Black Holes in Cosmology Lecture 3 : Constraints on their existence Massimo Ricotti (University of Maryland, USA) Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona 23/10/2017 Astrophysical Constraints Microlensing Macho,
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona 23/10/2017
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Carr, Bernard J. Springer Proc.Phys. 170 (2016) 23-31 arXiv:1402.1437 [gr-qc]
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
(cyan), large-scale structure (green) and accretion (orange) effects associated with PBHs. The effects are extragalactic γ-rays from evaporation (EG) [11], femtolensing of γ-ray bursts (F) [187], white-dwarf explosions (WD) [188], neutron-star capture constraints (NS) [36], Kepler microlensing of stars (K) [189], MACHO/EROS/OGLE micro- lensing of stars [27] and quasar microlensing (broken line) [190] (ML), survival of a star cluster in Eridanus II (E) [191], wide binary disruption (WB) [37], dynamical friction on halo objects (DF) [33], millilensing of quasars (mLQ) [32], generation of large-scale structure through Poisson fluctuations (LSS) [14] and accretion effects (WMAP and FIRAS) [15]. Only the strongest constraint is usually included in each mass range, but the accretion limits are shown with broken lines since they are highly model dependent. Where a constraint depends on some extra parameter which is not well known, we use a typical value. Most constraints cut off at high M due to the incredulity limit. See the original references for more accurate forms of these constraints.
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Refs: MACHO collaboration [e.g., Alcock et al. (1998, 2000, 2001); Hamadache et al. 2006]; EROS collaboration; Lacey & Ostriker 85; Moore 93; Carr 94; Afshordi, McDonald & Spergel 03; Yoo et al. 04
Physics Coll. Virginia Tech, 02-08-2008 – p.10/37
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
From Mack, Ostriker, Ricotti (2006)
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
1 5 10 50 100 500 1000 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
M M f Scenario A EROS Eridanus II WB
1015 1016 1017 1018 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
M g f Scenario C extragalactic GRBs GRB femtolensing
10 5 0.1 1000 107 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
M g f Scenario D PBH Relics Removed by inflation Relics dominate at evaporation
1019 1021 1023 1025 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
M g f Scenario B Kepler GRB femto lensing White dwarf capture Neutron star capture
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Parameter values in the red hatched area in the bottom left produce Nexp ≥ 3 microlensing events in the EROS-2 survey and are excluded at 95% confidence. The blue hatched area in the top right is excluded by the heating of ultrafaint dwarfs. The constraint from the disruption of the star cluster in Eri II is tighter and excludes a large region of parameter space. Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona
Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona