Under supervision
1 Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan 2 National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu 509-5292, Japan
Presented By
Presented By Under supervision 1 Department of Physics, Nagoya - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presented By Under supervision 1 Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan 2 National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu 509-5292, Japan Content Introduction Aim Hypothesis Method Results and
Under supervision
1 Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan 2 National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu 509-5292, Japan
Presented By
Copper Dt = 100 fs d = 40 mm l = 800 nm Intensity ~ 1013 W/cm2
Interspaces of LIPSS were in the range of 0.5λL – 0.85λL
Courtesy to Prof. M. Hashida ? cm
Φ=30 [mm] SCM415(alloy steel) 25% reduction
Laser Research 37,510 (2009) A.Vorobyev, et al., Laser Photonics B. Rev. 1-23 (2012)
effect of relativistic and nonrelativistic laser beam is the second major duty.
structure is the keywords of the thesis work.
experimental work is about I = = 10 1013
13– 10
1015
15 W/cm2. Our simulati
ation
dyin ing g case contain ined ed two cases es with h relativ ivist istic ic and nonrelat ativi ivistic stic laser r beam of intensity ity I = = 10 1018
18 W/cm2 - μm2 and
I = 10 1016
16 W/cm2 - μm2.
structure but without any evidences. Within in this s simulati ation
dy we can get a c clear eviden ence ce to existen ence ce of surface ce plasm sma wave and explain ain its role in formation ion mechan anism. ism.
first trial in this field. We could d expla lain in this s case by using relativi ivist stic ic laser r intensi sity.
❖ Computer Physics Communications 204 (2016) 141–151
Metal Pre-formed plasma Target Plasma Mimic plasma Laser Laser
Sample Sample
❖ Plasma Parameter:
✿ Target plasma – X = 2.0 〜12.0 µm – Y = -3.6 〜3.6 µm – ntarget = 10 ncr ✿ Mimic plasma – X = 0〜2.0 µm – Y = -3.6〜3.6 µm – nthin = 0.7 ncr
❖
Laser Parameter: λL = 800 nm incidence angle = 0° τrise = 15 fs, p-polarized, plane wave IL= 1018 W/cm2-µm2 continuously irradiated beam The Max experim rimen ental tal I= 10 1013
13 ~10
1015
15 W/cm2
✿ simulation Time : 0 ~ 500 fs
plane at snapshot t = 250 fs. The periodic nanograting structure
along the boundary between mimic plasma and target plasma at t = 250
from -3.0 to 3.0 µm, and the average interspace size of 0.46 µm is shorter than the laser wavelength of 0.8 µm.
t =150 0 fs fs t =200 0 fs fs
Electron Density Profile x-component of electron current density z-component of magnetic field
Current density ( Jxe) and magnetic field ( Bz) in a relation with time development.
: The maximum amplitude of Jxe and Bz : The minimum amplitude of Jxe and Bz
Current density (J/encrc)
Weibel Instability can be understood simply as the result of the superposition of two counter-streaming beams
❖ Plasma Parameter:
✿ Target plasma – X = 2.0 〜12.0 µm – Y = - 10.0 〜 10.0 µm – ntarget = 10 ncr ✿ Vacuum is surrounded target plasma everywhere.
❖
Laser Parameter: λL = 800 nm incidence angle = 0° τrise = 5 fs, p-polarized
10
Y X 2 12 Target Plasma
flattop shape (f = 10 µm) IL= 1016 W/cm2 - μm2 continuously irradiated beam The Max experimental I= 1013 ~ 1015 W/cm2 ✿ simulation Time: 0~500 fs
The electron density profile in the x-y plane in snapshots taken at (a) t =150 fs, (b) t =200 fs, (c) t = 250 fs, (d) t = 300 fs,(e) t = 350 fs,(f) t = 400 fs, (g) t = 450 fs, and (h) t = 500 fs.
t = 150 0 fs fs t = 200 0 fs fs t = 250 0 fs fs t = 300 0 fs fs t = 350 0 fs fs t = 400 0 fs t = 450 50 fs t = 500 0 fs fs
t = 300 fs Intermediate area Sparse area Y [micron]
Average electron density (ne/ncr) versus distance x (µm) with different density at (a) t = 200, (b) t = 300, (c) t = 400, and (d) t = 500 fs.
ninter~ 5 5 ncr
cr
nsparse~ 0.1 ncr
cr
The used relation to calculate wavelength of SPW is depend on nsparse and ninter
𝜇𝑡𝑞 𝜇𝑀 = 2 − (𝑜𝑡𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑓 + 𝑜𝑗𝑜𝑢𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑑𝑠 ) (1 − 𝑜𝑡𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑓 𝑜𝑑𝑠 )(1 − 𝑜𝑗𝑜𝑢𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑑𝑠 )
The used relation to calculate wavelength of SPW is depend on nsparse and ninter 𝜁 = 1 −
𝜕𝑞𝑓
2
𝜕𝑀
2 = 1 −
𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑑𝑠,
𝜁: is the permittivity of medium 𝑙𝑡𝑞 = 𝑙𝑀 𝜁𝑗𝑜𝑢𝑓𝑠. 𝜁𝑡𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑓 𝜁𝑗𝑜𝑢𝑓𝑠 + 𝜁𝑡𝑞𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑓
𝜕𝑡𝑞 = 𝜕𝑀 Wavelength of SPW with different density values. The graph is drawn for the range nsparse = 0 ~ 0.9 ncr and ninter = 1 ~ 5 ncr
generation is based on the collective behavior of the excited electrons in the y-direction due to the electric field component of the laser beam.
bidirectional collective behavior
the electrons in both positive and negative y-axis, leads to SPW propagation near to the interface, producing the so- called standing wave. The ponderomotive force of standing wave plays a major role in forming seeds or tips for the development of periodic nanograting structures at early stages since it is repeated each 𝛍sp/2 .
e e
x y EL 𝜕𝑡𝑞 = 𝜕𝑀
Define the position of pressure balance PL=Pp. 𝑄𝑀 = 2𝐽𝑀 𝑑 = 6.67𝐽𝑀 𝑋/𝑑𝑛2 𝑁𝑐𝑏𝑠 , 𝑄
𝑞 = 1.79 𝑜 𝑈𝑓 𝑙𝑓𝑊 /𝜇𝑀 2[𝜈𝑛][𝑁𝑐𝑏𝑠].
The position at which the pressure got balanced is at density n = 2.384 ncr is the interface position.
➢ Specify nsparse and ninter as the first local minima on the left hand side and x1,2 (µm) as the first local maxima on the right hand side of x1,2 (µm). ➢ We can calculate wavelength of SPW from the previous relation.
Comparison graph between the simulation and theoretical interspace.
Time (fs) Theoretical Interspace 𝛍sp/2 (µm) Simulated Interspace (µm)
intermediate area of the plasma due to the Fp of SPW and because the system is under the effect of the laser electric field EL , the surface electrons will continue oscillate and move in a direction opposite to the EL producing an electric field E1 .
scale of 𝝏L and density ripples causes a charge separation.
OTS FnL governs the total field EL+E1 as pointed
density and enlarge their sizes.
L
The Oscillating two stream instability can be calculating after using ninter according to the following relation:
Where: Q = ω2, Since ω = ωreal + iγoTs ao: laser parameter and depend on laser intensity. ෝ 𝜕𝑞𝑓
2 : is the electron density in the intermediate area and equal 𝒐𝒋𝒐𝒖𝒇𝒔 𝒐𝒅𝒔 .
𝒍𝑞𝑓
2 : is the normalized wavenumber of the surface plasma wave. 𝑛𝑓 𝑁𝑗 : is electron to ion mass ratio.
This graph has been drawn at 𝒍𝒕𝒒
𝟑 =1, 𝒃𝒑 𝟑 =0.5
𝑅3 − 2 + ෝ 𝜕𝑞𝑓
2
𝑅2 + 1 + 2 ෝ 𝜕𝑞𝑓
2 − 2
𝑙𝑡𝑞
2 𝑏𝑝 2 𝑛𝑓
𝑁𝑗 𝑅 − ෝ 𝜕𝑞𝑓
2 + 2
𝑙𝑡𝑞
2 𝑏𝑝 2 𝑛𝑓
𝑁𝑗 = 0
The growth rate of oscillating two stream instability in a relation with time enhancement.
2
2
If 𝛿𝑃𝑈𝑇𝑈 = 1, then T = 100 fs is required to grow up growth rate of value = 0.004 This proof the existence of
instability within our simulation time ( from 0 to 500 fs). 𝑏𝑝 = 0.85 𝜇𝑀[𝜈𝑛] 𝐽 [1018 𝑋/𝑑𝑛2]= 0.085
Plasma Simulation Analysis for Formation Mechanism of Periodic Nanograting Structures by Laser Pulses
❑
Number of Scholarships: JASSO: 91306004993 and MEXT: 144104 .