1
Presentation to Second International Congress on Controlled - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presentation to Second International Congress on Controlled - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presentation to Second International Congress on Controlled Environment Agriculture Panama City, Panama May 2017 1 Urban / Indoor Agriculture Overview Urban / indoor agriculture is on trend with was so many dynamics we like to see:
2
CONFIDENTIAL
2
Urban / Indoor Agriculture Overview
- Urban / indoor agriculture is on trend with was so many dynamics we like to see:
- Local, sustainable, healthy, environmentally-friendly, at times organic / non-GMO
- Local – massively reduces the supply chain
– The average head of lettuce travels 1,200 miles from field to store, and is grown for travel durability rather than
taste
- Sustainable and environmentally-friendly – depending on the model, water usage is a fraction of traditional agriculture and
can take advantage of under-utilized warehouse space in urban areas, etc.
- Healthy – produce is healthy in general, and can be organic and / or non-GMO
- Millennials – plays into Millennials’ preferences (healthy, clean label, less loyal to large CPG companies’ packaged
brands)
- Urban / indoor agriculture also addresses global issues with regards to decreasing safe fresh water, decreasing arable land,
diminishing fossil fuels and increasing associated transport costs, climate change, and burgeoning world populations
- Segment is projected to increase at a CAGR of 24.8% through 2022 (1)
(1) Source: Markets and Markets, Research and Markets
3
CONFIDENTIAL
3
Early Stage Dynamics, Challenges, and Solutions
- The urban / indoor agriculture industry, while growing rapidly is still very much in its infancy
- While attracting substantial attention, there has not, to-date, been an overabundance of true institutional capital flowing
into the space (at least in the U.S.)
- Given the need for growth capital, and the more so magnified by the capital intensity of the space, where do operators initially
look for capital?
- 1. Personal funds, friends, and family
- 2. Friendly investor
a) High net worth individual b) Former, retired executive in the agriculture, food and beverage, and / or retail space, etc. c) Socially conscious investor (e.g. someone who “wants to make the world a better place”) d) Alternative forms of financing – vendor financing i.
Construction
ii.
Electric utility
4
CONFIDENTIAL
4
Traction Technology Management Branding
(In Certain Cases)
Ability to Scale
Steps Required to Attract Institutional Capital
5
CONFIDENTIAL
5
Traction
- Market adoption / validation as demonstrated by:
- Several quarters of rapidly increasing sales
- Expanding customer list
- Average sales per order and increasing frequency of customer orders
- Supply agreements (volume with larger, sophisticated customers)
Traction Technology Management Branding
(In Certain Cases)
Ability to Scale
6
CONFIDENTIAL
6
Technology
- Technology:
- Differentiation, sustainable competitive advantage, etc.
- Patents, "know how"
- Producing and selling a commoditized product
– Cost will ultimately be a large component of whether you succeed or fail – Access to engineers, quant types - either as employees, or that the company has
access to through a local university, etc.
- Technology and its applications can range from:
- Hardware (equipment) and its configuration
– Lighting – grow lights, grow light reflectors, grow light ballasts – Hydroponic components – pumps and irrigation, meters and solutions, water filters – Climate control sensors – HVAC
- Software
- Automation of planting, pruning, and harvesting
- Species varietals
Traction Technology Management Branding
(In Certain Cases)
Ability to Scale
7
CONFIDENTIAL
7
Management
- Human capital talent is mission critical
- Great management teams can adapt a business model. Fundamentally, the skill set
needed in the indoor agriculture space is not all that much different than that needed in any other dynamic, evolving business
- Leadership needs to be able to attract and retain personnel, implement processes and
reporting
- Inherently commoditize product
- Need management teams that are able to wring inefficiencies out of a system,
bring costs down, replicate both within a given facility (or factory, or box) and amongst different facilities
ILLUSTRATIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM ROSTER
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer / Controller Engineer Grower Chief Operating Officer / Day-to-Day Operations (General Manager) Sales Founder / Visionary
Traction Technology Management Branding
(In Certain Cases)
Ability to Scale
8
CONFIDENTIAL
8
Branding (In Certain Cases)
- Brand drives premium positioning, and every grocer and retailer in the
U.S. is desirous of "premiumizing"
- Margin in the U.S. is made on the periphery of the store – to the extent
grocers can drive margin these areas, in what is overall a very low margin business, any improvement can have at outsized impact
REPRESENTATIVE BRANDED COMMODITIZED PRODUCTS
Traction Technology Management Branding
(In Certain Cases)
Ability to Scale
9
CONFIDENTIAL
9
Ability to Scale
- The single largest obstacle to any smaller urban / indoor agriculture
- peration
- Urban / indoor agriculture models ultimately come down to unit economic
and portability of the model
- Unit economics:
- Production yields per a given space metric, grow season, and how to
scale (get yields into place, drive cost down, expand market, supply agreements with big players)
- Portability of model:
- Function of grow system and its resultant yields, the processes in
place to ensure consistency, institutionalized / codified standard
- perating procedures (“SOP”) and processes that allow operation
across different geographies, external environments, markets, and labor conditions
- Ability to drive yields, bring costs down, replicate, and expand addressable
market (channels, geographies, supply agreements with large players) will determine ability to scale
- Access to capital
Traction Technology Management Branding
(In Certain Cases)
Ability to Scale
10
CONFIDENTIAL
10 10
Pros Cons EQUITY DEBT Market Terms
SENIOR DEBT
- Equity-holders retain the
upside benefits of growth in the business
- Advantageous from a tax
perspective
- May be used to cash out
current equity-holders
- Requires a lien on assets
- Imposes operating covenants
- n the business that can be
restrictive
- May be sensitive to volatility in
market rates
- Approx. LIBOR +250-600 bps
- Approx. 2.0-2.5x EBITDA
JUNIOR DEBT OR COMBINATION
- Equity-holders retain the
upside benefits growth in the business
- Payments can be interest-
- nly, or PIK
- Less restrictive than senior
debt
- May be used to cash out
current equity-holders
- Investors may provide
incremental expertise to support growth
- Debt characteristics but senior
to equity
- Higher cost than senior debt
- Lenders may insist on equity
upside
- May require a second lien on
assets
- Approx. LIBOR + 1200-1400
bps
- Approx. 1.0-1.5x EBITDA (if
applicable)
- Warrants
- Capital injection while current
- wnership maintains majority
control
- Allows for ongoing
involvement and participation
- f key managers
- Limits disruption to employee
culture and customer relationships
- Investors provide incremental
expertise to support future growth
MINORITY RECAPITALIZATION
- Doesn’t provide complete
liquidity
- Introduces additional
stakeholders to decision making processes
- May introduce lender reporting
requirements and lender due diligence
- May increase administrative
burden
- Request for preferred security
- Request for board seat or
visitation rights
MAJORITY RECAPITALIZATION
- Provides significant liquidity
and capital for growth
- Allows for ongoing
involvement and participation
- f key managers
- Investors provide incremental
expertise to support future growth
- Current ownership does not
maintain majority control
- Introduces additional
stakeholders to decision making processes
- May introduce lender reporting
requirements and lender due diligence
- May increase administrative
burden
- Buyer may request a preferred
security
- Portion of proceeds (5%) may
be held in escrow
Financing Growth
11
CONFIDENTIAL
11
Financing Growth (Continued)
- Construction
- Electric utility
- Supply agreement
- Royalty
NON-TRADITIONAL FINANCING:
12 12
Appendix
13
CONFIDENTIAL
13 13 13
Craig Lawson
Co-Founder & Managing Director San Francisco clawson@mhtpartners.com Office: (415) 446-9435
Speaker
Craig Lawson Managing Director / Co-Founder – MHT Partners
Craig has over 20 years of sell-side and buy-side financial experience, including dedicated public and private company M&A experience spanning buy-side and sell-side transactions, LBOs, going private transactions, joint ventures, cross border transactions, and fairness
- pinions. He brings deep experience with consumer products, business services, and
technology and leads MHT Partners’ Consumer Growth industry practice. Within the Consumer Growth practice, he has a particular focus on the environmental services / sustainability space (including the urban / indoor agriculture space), having closed several deals over the past few years and presently working with several others. Prior to co-founding MHT Partners, Craig served as a senior banker in the San Francisco office of Harris Williams & Co. Additional experience also includes time in the mergers and acquisitions groups at Banc of America Securities, where he was a senior banker, and Bear Stearns, as well as serving as a securities analyst at Fidelity Investments. Craig holds an MBA from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and graduated cum laude with a BA in Economics and History from Tufts University. He also holds the CFA designation.