Presentation Title Patient Reported Outcome 36pt Arial Bold - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation title patient reported outcome 36pt arial
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Presentation Title Patient Reported Outcome 36pt Arial Bold - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Title Patient Reported Outcome 36pt Arial Bold Measures (PROMs) Sub heading 24pt Arial Presentation by: Dr Kofi Nimako, Consultant Chest Physician Dr Thayalan Kandiah, Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry An Associated


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presentation Title 36pt Arial Bold

Sub heading 24pt Arial

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

Presentation by: Dr Kofi Nimako, Consultant Chest Physician Dr Thayalan Kandiah, Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry

An Associated University Hospital of Brighton and Sussex Medical School

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What are PROMs ?

  • Standardised validated instruments used to measure a

patient’s perception of their:

  • Health
  • Functional status
  • QoL
  • Outcomes – “are my symptoms better?”
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why consider PROMs ?

  • Patient centred approach to:
  • Improving quality of care and QoL
slide-4
SLIDE 4

A new approach to PROMs

  • Incorporating into routine clinical practice
  • Driven by clinicians
  • Used to improve patient care
  • Diagnosis
  • Communication
  • Treatment response
  • Disease monitoring
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Implementation

  • Utilisation of your care matters
  • Retrospective completion of questionnaire
  • Pilot – 3 month
  • Tilgate and Tandridge
  • Dental and Maxillofacial out-patients
  • Outcomes
  • Rates of patient participation
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results

  • N = 102
  • 50% participation

Slide 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results – Physical Health

  • *A score of 50 represents average for population

Location N Physical Health (*) Dental Outpatients 18 16 (51) Tandridge Ward 33 13 (42) Tilgate Ward 51 12 (40)

Slide 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results – Mental Health

  • *A score of 50 represents average for population

Location N Mental Health Dental Outpatients 18 11 (41) Tandridge Ward 33 11 (41) Tilgate Ward 51 10 (39)

Slide 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results – Change

  • **10 = significantly improved, 0 = significantly worse

Location N How felt after hospital stay/procedure ** Dental Outpatients 18 8.2 Tandridge Ward 33 8.3 Tilgate Ward 51 7.4

Slide 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conclusion

  • Collection of PROMs data is essential to improve quality of

care

  • Feasible
  • Good participation from patients
  • Early results promising
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Challenges

  • Developing the results interface – currently not ideal
  • Roll out to other departments

Slide 11