SLIDE 1
Presentation Outline
- Project Team
- Study Background
- Disparity Results
- Anecdotal Information
- Commendations and
Recommendations
- Questions and Answers
Presentation Outline Project Team Study Background Disparity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presentation Outline Project Team Study Background Disparity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
H ILLSBOROUGH C OUNTY A VIATION A UTHORITY 2015 Disparity Study Update Public Forum September 3, 2015 Presentation Outline Project Team Study Background Disparity Results Anecdotal Information Commendations and
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Disparity Project Team
MGT of America
- Reggie Smith
Executive Partner- in-Charge
- Vernetta Mitchell
Project Manager
- Dr. Vince Eagan, J.D.
Technical Advisor
- Marilyn Wiley Data
Manager
- Thomas Huggins Ariel
Business Group
- Anneliese Oppenheim
Oppenheim Research Hillsborough County Aviation Authority
- Elita Cobbs-McMillon,
- Esq. Director of Ethics,
Diversity, & Administration
- Cheryl Hawkins DBE
Program Manager
- Bonnie Yauilla DBE
Manager
SLIDE 4
Study Background
Study Parameters
- Payments made
between October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2012
- Includes payments
to firms located in the Tampa-St. Petersburg- Clearwater Metropolitan Statistical Area (Tampa MSA) MSA
- Separate analysis
for Federally-funded spending and non- Federally-funded spending
- General contracting
- Runway expansions
- Architecture/Engineering
Construction
- Financial Services
- Legal
- Information Technology
Professional Services
- Janitorial/Maintenance
- Uniformed guard services
- Vehicle repair
Non-Professional Services
- Office goods
- Equipment
- Vehicles
Goods & Supplies
SLIDE 5
Utilization & Availability: Federally Funded Spending
Total Federally- funded spending in Construction with firms inside
- f the Tampa
MSA was $56,804,628
BUSINESS OWNERSHIP CLASSIFICATION % OF DOLLARS % OF AVAILABILITY
CONSTRUCTION African American 1.51% 5.83% Native American 0.00% 0.34% Asian Pacific American 0.54% 2.06% Subcontinent Asian American 0.00% 0.46% Hispanic Americans 6.13% 14.51% Nonminority Women 3.18% 21.60% Non-W/M/DBE Firms 88.63% 55.20%
SLIDE 6
Utilization & Availability: Non- Federally Funded Spending
Total Non- Federally- funded spending in Construction with firms inside
- f the Tampa
MSA was $140,513,431
BUSINESS OWNERSHIP CLASSIFICATION % OF DOLLARS % OF AVAILABILITY
CONSTRUCTION African American 2.46% 5.83% Native American 0.16% 0.34% Asian Pacific American 0.28% 2.06% Subcontinent Asian American 0.00% 0.46% Hispanic Americans 8.27% 14.51% Nonminority Women 3.17% 21.60% Non-W/M/DBE Firms 85.65% 55.20%
SLIDE 7
Utilization & Availability: Non- Federally Funded Spending
Total Non- Federally- funded spending in Professional Services with firms inside of the Tampa MSA was $1,671,063
BUSINESS OWNERSHIP CLASSIFICATION % OF DOLLARS % OF AVAILABILITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES African American 1.08% 15.35% Native American 0.00% 1.40% Asian Pacific American 0.00% 1.40% Subcontinent Asian American 0.00% 1.40% Hispanic Americans 5.68% 8.84% Nonminority Women 1.79% 18.14% Non-W/M/DBE Firms 91.45% 53.49%
SLIDE 8
Utilization & Availability: Non- Federally Funded Spending
Total Non- Federally- funded spending in Non- Professional Services with firms inside of the Tampa MSA was $49,212,228
BUSINESS OWNERSHIP CLASSIFICATION % OF DOLLARS % OF AVAILABILITY
NON-PROFESSIONAL SERVICES African American 0.00% 6.31% Native American 0.00% 0.90% Asian Pacific American 0.09% 0.90% Subcontinent Asian American 0.00% 0.00% Hispanic Americans 0.60% 9.01% Nonminority Women 0.26% 8.11% Non-W/M/DBE Firms 99.05% 74.77%
SLIDE 9
Utilization & Availability: Non- Federally Funded Spending
Total Non- Federally- funded spending in Goods & Supplies with firms inside of the Tampa MSA was $7,224,710
BUSINESS OWNERSHIP CLASSIFICATION % OF DOLLARS % OF AVAILABILITY
GOODS & SUPPLIES African American 3.06% 7.73% Native American 0.00% 0.45% Asian Pacific American 0.00% 0.00% Subcontinent Asian American 0.00% 0.45% Hispanic Americans 3.43% 7.27% Nonminority Women 4.81% 8.64% Non-W/M/DBE Firms 88.79% 75.45%
SLIDE 10
Disparity: Non-Federally- funded Spending
- Construction
– Substantial underutilization for all W/M/DBE Groups
- Professional Services
– Substantial underutilization for all W/M/DBE Groups
- Non-Professional Service
– Substantial underutilization in all W/M/DBE groups except Subcontinent Asian American due to mathematical constraint of division by zero.
- Goods and Supplies
– Substantial underutilization for all W/M/DBE Groups
SLIDE 11
Anecdotal Data Collection
With respect to disparate treatment W/M/DBE respondents reported:
- Seldom or never being solicited when there were no DBE
goals - 42.1% or 131 firms
- An informal network precluded their firms from obtaining
work in the private sector - 26.0% or 81 firms
- Being dropped from a project after being included to
satisfy good faith efforts requirements - 12.9% or 40 firms
- Discrimination faced as a prime contractor - 2.6% or 8
firms
- Discrimination faced in the private sector - 5.22% or 28
firms
- Discrimination faced as a subcontractor - 1.9% or 6 firms
One Public Hearing One Focus Group 31 One-on-one interviews 536 completed surveys
SLIDE 12
Commendations & Recommendations
- Commendations
– Subcontractor Project Goals – W/MBE Program for Non-Federally funded spending – SBE Program – Outreach – Vendor Rotation
- Recommendations
– Performance Evaluations – Program Staffing
SLIDE 13
Public Forum Guidelines
- Limit your comments to 5 minutes
- Questions should be related to the
2015 Disparity Study Update
- Comments are accepted until
October 2nd at
http://www.tampaairport.com/hillsborough- county-aviation-authority-disparity-study- update
SLIDE 14