pramea probabilistic risk assessment method development
play

PRAMEA Probabilistic risk assessment method development and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PRAMEA Probabilistic risk assessment method development and applications Presentation at the SAFIR2018 research programme final seminar, Hanasaari 21.3.2019 1 25.3.2019 VTT beyond the obvious HRA and advanced control rooms


  1. PRAMEA – Probabilistic risk assessment method development and applications Presentation at the SAFIR2018 research programme final seminar, Hanasaari 21.3.2019 1 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

  2. HRA and advanced control rooms § Accepted review manuscript about the effect of digitalization of NPP control rooms, in RESS (Reliability Engineering and System Safety) • Digital systems provide operator with more information but also with secondary tasks, compared with analogue systems • With digital UI, operator is not self-evidently aware of activities of other operators • Digital systems are more often updated, causing pressure to plant design and training § User study among Finnish hybrid main control room operators about possible human errors in an emergency; comparison of errors • Operator interviews related to PRISE procedures in a hybrid control room (analogue for controlling, digital for monitoring the system) about possible errors • In practice, less possible errors in digital UI (user interface) • In principle, in most cases the same error could take place in both types of UIs § The cause behind digitally originating/analogue originating error may be different � may affect error probability BUT the mere digitality/analogueness does not does not dictate the amount or level of human errors 2 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

  3. Site risk analysis • Current PRAs are unit-specific • Inter-unit dependencies taken into account in a limited manner • Operational experience world-wide shows that multi-unit disturbances are not uncommon • No international consensus yet with regard to • Applicable risk criteria for a site • Method 3

  4. Site PRA developments and findings: NKS project SITRON, report NKS-419 • Site risk analysis has two purposes • Complement single-unit PSAs • Provide multi-unit risk metrics • Safety goals are still connected to units, not at site level • SITRON method provides a practical and cost-effective way of performing a site risk analysis based on unit-specific PRAs • Multi-unit initiating events can be limited to external hazards • Loss-of-offsite power, Loss-of-ultimate heat sink 4

  5. FinPSA level 2 § Tool based on dynamic containment event trees (CETs) developed further § Risk integrator combines results of different CETs and calculates total results § Tight integration of PRA levels 1 and 2 implemented • Contributions of basic events and initiating events in level 2 results • Level 1 results can be utilised in level 2 modelling 5 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

  6. Level 2 PRA modelling § A simplified BWR plant PRA model has been developed • Five containment event trees • Levels 1 and 2 tightly integrated • Model can be utilised in further research, demonstrations, trainings and FinPSA testing § Uncertainty analysis • Problems and good practises identified and demonstrated • In dynamic modelling, proper handling of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties is important 6 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

  7. Time-dependent analysis in FinPSA § Can be used for maintenance planning, risk follow-up and analysis of seasonal variations § Time-dependent task file • User specifies events to a time line • e.g. maintenance activities, tests, parameter changes, configuration changes • FinPSA calculates time-dependent risk curve, using existing PRA results 7 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

  8. Level 3 PRA 8,00E+02 Population dose (M anSv) Improvements to an analysis method 6,00E+02 • Developed earlier by VTT 4,00E+02 • Systematic analysis of scenarios with event trees 2,00E+02 • Improvements: no discretization of continuous factors (e.g. wind speed) needed, source term 0,00E+00 0 10 20 30 40 uncertainty taken into account Rain intensity (mm/ hour) Nordic guidance document on level 3 PRA 1,00E+00 exceed the cancer The probability to • Uses, benefits, regulations, analysis steps etc. 1,00E-01 deaths 1,00E-02 Seasonal and contextual factors in level 3 1,00E-03 1,00E-04 • Groundwork for systematic incorporation in 1,00E-05 analyses 1,00E-06 0 50 100 150 200 The number of cancer deaths 8 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

  9. Portfolio optimization in PRAMEA § Pipe inspections (c.f. RI-ISI) • Problem : Which pipes should be inspected based on incomplete information about failure probabilities and failure impacts? • Large-scale optimization of inspections of the sewerage network in Espoo § Defence-in-depth • Problem : Which combinations of safety measures are cost-efficient in a system with event dependencies and multi-state failures? • Optimization of safety measures for the airlock system of a CANDU Nuclear Power Plant 9 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

  10. Portfolio optimization in PRAMEA § Dynamic systems • Problem : Which combinations of safety measures are cost-efficient in preventing time-dependent accident scenarios? • Real case study on the vapour cloud ignition of an industrial system § Cybersecurity • Problem : Which mitigation strategies minimize the risks of cyber threats to cyber physical systems? • Case study on the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) of an electric power system § Four papers in leading international journals (2 published in RESS, 1 revised for RESS, 1 submitted) 10 25.3.2019 VTT – beyond the obvious

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend