**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool A Companion Tool of the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ppr monitoring and assessment tool
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool A Companion Tool of the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dr Giancarlo Ferrari (FAO) Dr Nadge Leboucq (OIE) Members of the GFTADs PPR Working Group **** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool **** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool A Companion Tool of the Global Strategy for the PPR MONITORING and


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Dr Giancarlo Ferrari (FAO) Dr Nadège Leboucq (OIE)

Members of the GF‐TADs PPR Working Group

**** PPR Monitoring

and Assessment Tool

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • A Companion Tool of the

Global Strategy for the Control and Eradication of PPR to monitor its proper implementation and assess progress

  • (Can be used as a standalone

Tool)

3

PPR MONITORING and Assessment TOOL (PMAT) A Companion Tool of the

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • 3 components
  • PPR control and eradication
  • Reinforcement of VS
  • Combined control of other

TADs

  • 3 levels of

intervention

  • National
  • Regional
  • Global

PMAT focus **** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • is based on four different stages identified in the

PPR Global Strategy

5

The Stages correspond to a combination of decreasing levels of epidemiological risk and increasing levels of prevention and control

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • is based on five technical elements identified in

the PPR Global Strategy

6

Diagnostic Surveillance Prevention and control Legal framework Stakeholder involvement

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • is based on the Enabling Environment concept,

whereby efficient VS are indispensable for the successful and sustainable implementation of PPR (and other major TADs) prevention and control activities

7

Therefore, VS capacity must be reinforced as the country moves along the PPR Stages (‘progressive institutionalisation of PPR prevention and control’)

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

PPR Stage

Epidemio- logical situation Focus of the

Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage)

Specific

  • bjectives

linked to the 5 technical elements

PPR Outcomes

and Activities

Tools

(focused use in the specific context of the stage)

Enabling environment

and

Prevention & control of

  • ther SR

diseases

Each Stage is described by the following aspects:

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

PPR Stage

Epidemio- logical situation Focus of the

Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage)

Specific

  • bjectives

linked to the 5 technical elements

PPR Outcomes

and Activities

Tools

(focused use in the specific context of the stage)

Enabling environment

and

Prevention & control of

  • ther SR

diseases

Each Stage is described by the following aspects:

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

PPR Stage

Epidemio- logical situation Focus of the

Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage)

Specific

  • bjectives

(main features)

PPR Outcomes

and Activities linked to the 5 technical elements

Tools

(focused use in the specific context of the stage)

Enabling environment

and

Prevention & control of

  • ther SR

diseases

Each Stage is described by the following aspects:

—Relates the five main elements (diagnostic, surveillance, prevention and control, legislation, stakeholders’ involvement) —Activities in a given Stage are appropriate to mitigate the risk in accordance with the evidence provided in the preceding Stage —Activities and their impacts are measurable in each Stage — The implementation of ALL activities should enable countries to achieve the progressive decrease in the incidence of PPR to the point at which the disease can be eliminated from the domestic animal populations (and wildlife if relevant).

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

PPR Stage

Epidemio- logical situation Focus of the

Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage)

Specific

  • bjectives

(main features)

PPR Outcomes

and Activities linked to the 5 technical elements

Tools

(focused use in the specific context of the stage)

Enabling environment

and

Prevention & control of

  • ther SR

diseases

Each Stage is described by the following aspects: Activities Outcomes

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

PPR Stage

Epidemio- logical situation Focus of the

Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage)

Specific

  • bjectives

(main features)

PPR Outcomes

and Activities linked to the 5 technical elements

Tools

(focused use in the specific context of the stage)

Enabling environment

and

Prevention & control of

  • ther SR

diseases

Each Stage is described by the following aspects:

Critical competencies (for effective performance and good governance of national VS) 33 are of particular relevance to the control and eradication of PPR However, they are also relevant according to the focus of the stage

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

  • CC I.2.A
  • CC I.3
  • CC II.1.A
  • CC II.1.B
  • CC II.3
  • CC. II.5.B
  • CC III.2
  • CC III.3
  • CCIII.4
  • CCIII.5.A
  • CCIII.5.B
  • CC IV.1
  • CC I.1.A
  • CC I.1.B
  • CC I.2.B
  • CC I.6.A
  • CC I.6.B
  • CC I.7
  • CC I. 8
  • CC I.11
  • CC. II.5.A
  • CC II.7
  • CC II.8.B
  • CC III. 1
  • CC III.6
  • CC IV.2
  • CC IV.7
  • CC II.2
  • CC II.12.A
  • CC II.4
  • CC II.6
  • CC I.9
  • CC IV.6

Stage 1 focus

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ To gain a better epidemiological understanding of the presence of PPR Risk analysis Active surveillance Consultation with stakeholders Preparation of legislation and regulations

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Objective of the PMAT
  • To qualify countries at the appropriate stage along the

step‐wise approach for the control and eradication of PPR

  • To monitor progress within a given Stage and provide an

indicative list of activities to implement in the year to come (annual PPR Roadmap)

14

Where? How? [assessment tool] [monitoring tool]

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

Description part Questionnaire part ‘Way forward’ part

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT (descriptive part)
  • ‘Logical framework approach’

16

Outcome X Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity n Indicator 1 Indicator 2.1 Indicator 2.2 Target Means of verification GCES PMAT

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

Target /

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

A5  Train veterinary officers from central and peripheral level on value chain and risk analysis I5  Number of Veterinarians at central, regional (Province, Directorate, district….) level involved in value chain and risk analysis trained (target: 75% of the staff has received training before 12 months after entering into Stage 1, 100% before 2 years )

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT (questionnaire part)

18

Outcome X Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity n Indicator 1 Indicator 2.1 Indicator 2.2 Target GCES PMAT Questions

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Questionnaire

List of questions: ‐ ‘white’ = PPR specific ‐ ‘yellow’ = VS specific Each question relate to a list of activities (and indicators) Level of achievement ‐ Fully ‐ Partially ‐ Not ‐ (not applicable)

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Q2  Value chains and risk analysis studies have provided a good understanding of hotspots and transmission pathways to an extent that those can be specifically targeted and mitigated (basis for implementing a Risk based strategic plan to move to stage 2) [A5 – I5; A6 – I6] Q7  The VS compile and maintain data and have the capability to carry out risk analysis. The majority of risk management measures are based on risk assessment [CC II.3 level 3]

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Fully achieved Partially achieved Not achieved Not applicable

Comments

Q2  Value chains and risk analysis studies have provided a good understanding of hotspots and transmission pathways to an extent that those can be specifically targeted and mitigated (basis for implementing a Risk based strategic plan to move to stage 2) [A5 – I5; A6 – I6]

A5  Train veterinary officers from central and peripheral level on value chain and risk analysis I5  Number of Veterinarians at central, regional (Province, Directorate, district….) level involved in value chain and risk analysis trained (target: 75% of the staff has received training before 12 months after entering into Stage 1, 100% before 2 years ) A6  (VS) Identify risks hotspots and transmission pathways using the value chains and risk analysis principles I6  Number of meetings organized by the Veterinary Services to identify and involve stakeholders along the value chain. Evidence

  • f meetings should be available through

minutes of the meetings (target: at least one meeting per year at national level and if possible one meeting during the first two years at each regional level)Number of hotspots identified (no specific targets)

x

A5 and A6 achieved (targets)

x

A5 not achieved (target) or A6 not achieved (target) or Neither A5 nor A6 achieved

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fully achieved Partially achieved Not achieved Not applicable

Comments

Q7  The VS compile and maintain data and have the capability to carry out risk

  • analysis. The majority of risk management

measures are based on risk assessment [CC II.3 level 3]

x

‐ Addressing PVS results confidentiality issue ‐ No PVS Assessment or Assessment older than 3 years  request for a PVS Assessment mission

If level  3  Fully achieved If level < 3  partially achieved

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • ‘Organisation’ of the PMAT (‘Way forward ’ part)

23

Outcome X Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity n Indicator 1 Indicator 2.1 Indicator 2.2 Target GCES PMAT Questions Roadmap Table

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

  • PPR Roadmap Table for Stage 1 Outcome 2

Please report in this Table the activities above that have been partially or Not achieved at all Activity Timeframe Responsible staff

Activity 1  Activity 2  Activity 3 ‐

Fully achieved Partially achieved Not achieved Not applicable Comments

Q2  Value chains and risk analysis studies have provided a good understanding of hotspots and transmission pathways to an extent that those can be specifically targeted and mitigated (basis for implementing a Risk based strategic plan to move to stage 2) [A5 – I5; A6 – I6]

x

Neither A5 nor A6 achieved

Train veterinary officers from central and peripheral level on value chain and risk analysis (VS) Identify risks hotspots and transmission pathways using the value chains and risk analysis principles

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

September 2015 March 2016 Mrs xxx Mr xxx

slide-25
SLIDE 25

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • How to use the PMAT?

26

[monitoring tool]

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

 To monitor progress within a given Stage and provide an indicative list of activities to implement in the year to come (annual PPR Roadmap)

 ‘Self‐assessment mode’

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • How to use the PMAT?

27

[assessment tool]

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

 To qualify countries at the appropriate stage along the step‐wise approach for the control and eradication of PPR  ‘External assessment mode’ (GF‐ TADs Acceptance involving a Regional Advisory Group)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

‘Gateway’ to enter the step‐wise approach Stage 2 ‘Gateway’ Stage 3 ‘Gateway’ Stage 4 ‘Gateway’

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

  • How to use the PMAT?

‘Gateway’  To fulfill: ‐ The requirement of the preceding Stage + Requirements to enter the next Stage (GCES) ‘Gateway’  To fulfill: ‐ The requirement of the preceding Stage + Requirements to enter the next Stage (GCES)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

  • How to use the PMAT?
slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

To move to the next stage, all ‘mandatory’ questions (Q1, Q2, Q3) must be achieved; this is not the case in this example, the country cannot move to Stage 2 (if external assessment, it can be granted with a ‘provisional status 1 or 2’ until all documents are provided and compliant)

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Finalizing the Tool

Expert meeting planned before the end of 2015 Objectives: ‐ Refine the indicators ‐ Refine the targets ‐ Refine the questionnaire ‐ (means of verifications?)

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Dr Giancarlo Ferrari Dr Nadège Leboucq

**** Thank you

GF‐TADs PPR Working Group members

Giancarlo.ferrari@fao.org n.leboucq@oie.int

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • To monitor progress within a given Stage and provide an

indicative list of activities to implement in the year to come (annual PPR Roadmap)

33

[monitoring

tool]

How?

**** PPR Monitoring and Assessment Tool