Power & Control in Multi- Employer CB: The Hybridization of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

power control in multi
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Power & Control in Multi- Employer CB: The Hybridization of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Power & Control in Multi- Employer CB: The Hybridization of Israeli IR System Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University Lectures Steps 1. Few Words About my Position in the Field. 2.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Power & Control in Multi- Employer CB: The Hybridization of Israeli IR System

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Lecture’s Steps

  • 1. Few Words About my Position in the Field.
  • 2. Introduction

– Israeli IR System (Foundations, Levels

  • f

Regulation).

  • 3. IR Change in Private Sector – Industry and Services Sectors, From

Corporatist System to Hybrid System.

  • 4. Redefining

Force/Power in IR System – Introducing Some Qualitative Indicators.

  • 5. Q & A and Comments.

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Israel IR Background

  • The

General Trade-Union “Federation” – the “Histadrut” as a State-Builder.

  • Employers

Associations – Manufacturers' Association, and Service-Sectors EAs.

  • Collective Bargaining Law (1957).

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-5
SLIDE 5

IR Background – Industry Sector(s)

  • Top-Down Organization and Heterogeneous Representation.
  • Low levels of EA Density.
  • Sector-Level CBAs After Period of Rank & File Dissent.
  • High Inter-Sectoral Coordination by Peak-Level.
  • Company-Level Representation – from Restraint to Upheaval.

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Industry – IR System in Full employment (1959-1965)

  • Full-Employment + Wage Restraint = Wild Strikes.
  • Full-Employment + Wage increases at NLCA = Wild Strikes.
  • High Wage Drift – 50-100% Above Sectoral CBAs.
  • The Answer to Wild Wage-Drift –

Recession

(as a mean of centralization)

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Industry – Centralization Vs. Decentralization

  • Centralized Social-Pacts (1970-1974):
  • Equal Multi-Sector Wage Restraint in Peak-Level.
  • Subversive Breaches – in sector and company level.
  • Polarization and the Victory of Difference (1976-1995):
  • Heterogeneity of Employers, High Wage-Drift and Low Social Benefits.
  • Sector-Level Failure.
  • Recognition in Company-Level CB (1978).
  • Centralized Private-sector peak level CBAs (1976-1995).

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

Year

1948-1958 Austerity 1959-1964 Full Employment 1965-1967 Recession 1968-1969 War and Wage Freeze 1970-1978 Full Employment

Unemployment 7-15% 2-5% 9-12% 5-7% 4-5% Wage increase (decrease) 0-3% 10-25% 0-(2)% 0% 6-20%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Service Sectors – Creation of Sectoral- Level

  • Local Level Representation of (weak) workers (1940-1965).
  • Bottom-Up employers’ Organization (1965-1970):
  • From Company/Local Level CBAs to Sector-Level CBAs – Rise in

Coverage rate.

  • Creating Homogenous Sectors.
  • Centralization of TU Activity.
  • Top-Down Sector-Level CB:
  • Reproducing Low Levels of Representation.
  • Low-Level of wages + High Level of Social Benefits.

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Services Sectors – Centralization Reproduced

  • Homogenous Sectors:
  • Bottom-Up Organization (of Employers) – Legitimizing Employers’

Cooperation with Sectoral Wage-Policy.

  • Concentration

– High Level

  • f

EA Density, Concentrated TU Representation.

  • Weak-Workers CBA:
  • Low Wages (and Low Wage-Drift) & High Social Benefits.
  • Frequent Concession Bargaining.
  • No Company Level CB (!).

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Summery (1): Israeli IR System – Hybrid structure and Logic

Sectors Wage Drift Difference Dominant IR Regime Workers Menmbership- Coverage Link

Industry High Drift – Company-Level CBAs Increasing Heterogeneity and Decreasing Representativeness Pluralist/Decentrali zed CB Structure Low Membership – Decreasing Coverage. Services Medium Drift – Market Forces Reproducing Homogeneity and Low Representativeness Corporatist/Centra lized CB Structure Low Membership – High Coverage.

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Summery (2): Qualitative Indicators – Difference & Concentration

Qualitative Indicators:

  • Homogeneity/Heterogeneity:
  • Industry – The Challenges of Difference.
  • Services – The Facilitation of Cooperation.
  • Structural and Political Concentration:
  • The Declining Role of CBAs & The Rising Role of Benefits.
  • Concentration and the Control of Company/Local Level CB.

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusion

  • The Israeli IR System – Between Corporatism and Pluralism.
  • Hybrid System – Fragility or Resilience (Baking Vs. Public-Trans.)?
  • Workers’ Weakness and EA Benefits – Maintain Control Over

Constituents.

  • The Challenge of Growing Difference in Labor Market.

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank You Very Much!

Assaf Bondy - PhD Cnadidate, Department of Labor Studies, Tel- Aviv University