portfolio and performance review the swiss helvetia fund
play

Portfolio and Performance Review The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Portfolio and Performance Review The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc. Date: October, 2016 November 2014 | For professional investors only. This material is not suitable for retail clients Agenda The case for Swiss equities Why consider the Swiss


  1. Portfolio and Performance Review The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc. Date: October, 2016 November 2014 | For professional investors only. This material is not suitable for retail clients

  2. Agenda The case for Swiss equities  Why consider the Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc.  Performance  Portfolio positioning  Outlook  Source: Schroders 1

  3. Swiss equities The case for

  4. Swiss stocks leading in global competitiveness Very high percentage of Swiss index members are global leaders Global rank At points over the past few years, approx. Name Market within market 2/3 of large caps in the Swiss Market Index Nestle 1 Food (“SMI”) have been ranked first or second Novartis 2 Drugs within their markets on a global basis. 1 Roche 1 Diagnostics UBS 1 Wealth management Approximately 40% of Swiss mid caps, too. ABB 2 Power transmission / distribution Richemont 1 Jewelry Syngenta 1 Crop protection Swiss Re 2 Reinsurance LafargeHolcim 1 Cement Givaudan 1 Flavours / fragrance Adecco 1 Staffing Swatch 1 Watches SGS 1 Inspection / testing 1 Source: Schroder research and company websites, Forbes 2014, EvaluateMedTech October 2014, BloombergNews 17.7.2014, Chemweek 23.8.2013, GlobalCement 9.12.2013, Leffingwell 15.5.2015, Staffingindustry 16.10.2013, Reuters 19.5.2015. The views and forecasts contained herein are those of the Schroders Swiss Equities team based on information that they believe to be reliable. 3

  5. How is global leadership of Swiss stocks possible? Switzerland offers an attractive business environment The World Economic Forum has been looking into drivers of competitiveness and prosperity in 138 economies. Amongst others, the following help explain the strong position of Switzerland: - innovation - infrastructure - education - labor market efficiency - macroeconomic environment - business sophistication The latest version of the study was released on September 28, 2016 and crowned Switzerland for 8 th consecutive year, with an overall score improvement compared to 2015. Source: World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report 2016-17, rank out of 138 economies. See also: http://www.prosperity.com The Legatum Institute, a London based think tank, on November 2, 2015, published its annual global prosperity index, Switzerland ranked number 2 based on 89 variables split into 8 subindexes (economy, entrepreneurship &opportunity, governance, education, health, safety & security, personal freedom, and social capital). 4

  6. Swiss companies are innovation leaders Leading innovation score driven by high per capita patent filings 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 IN RU BR RO BG MK TR LV LT CN HR PL SK EL HU ES RS MT PT AU IT CY CZ NO EE SI EU28 AT FR BE IS IE UK LU NL DE FI JP DK SE USA SK CH • Modest Innovators • Moderate Innovators • Innovation Followers • Innovation Leaders Source: Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015 (EU) 5

  7. Leadership has led to long-term outperformance Swiss equities significantly outperformed global stocks for over 25 years Cumulative stock market return 1700% 1500% Swiss Performance Index (SPI) Swiss Equities: 10.2% p.a. in USD 1300% 1100% MSCI World All Country Total Return Index 900% 700% MSCI World All Country Total 500% Return Index: 7.0% p.a. in USD 300% 100% -100% Performance difference SPI - MSCI World All Countries TR 1000% Performance difference: 3.2% p.a. 800% 600% 400% 200% 0% -200% Source: Bloomberg, performance in USD as of September 30, 2016. Performance shown is past performance which is no guarantee of future results. 6

  8. Swiss companies are geographically diversified Swiss companies regional sales exposure 100% Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified MEA 90% MEA APAC APAC 80% APAC MEA Europe APAC 70% Americas Americas ex US 60% Americas Americas 50% Europe 40% Europe ex domestic ex domestic 30% Europe 20% ex domestic 10% Domestic Domestic Domestic Domestic 0% Switzerland Europe (E300)* UK US Source: HSBC, July 3, 2014; *UBS February 10, 2015, data based on averages. 7

  9. Why Consider The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc.

  10. The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc. Why invest in Swiss equities through a closed–end fund? Allows US investors to access to the fund management team’s capabilities  The fund has better diversification compared to the Swiss Performance Index (SPI)  A closed-end fund allows a long-term investment horizon (no unknown future in-/outflows)  Currently the share price trades at a discount to NAV  100% 80% Portfolio weight SWZ SPI 60% Swiss Performance Index Top 3 positions 35% 50% Swiss Helvetia Fund 40% Top 5 positions 44% 58% 20% Top 10 positions 59% 71% 0% Source: Schroders, Bloomberg, September 30, 2016. Views expressed reflect those of the portfolio management team as of today’s date and do not necessarily reflect the views of Schroders. These views may change. 9

  11. Performance FY 2015 and YTD 2016

  12. Performance FY 2015 and ytd 2016 NAV and price performance in USD Net Asset Value 31.12.14 – Performance in USD % FY 2015 H1 2016 Q3 2016 ytd 16 30.09.16 NAV (US GAAP) as per quarterly filings 2.96% -2.52% 3.26% 0.66% 3.64% SWZ NAV as published* 2.89% -2.76% 3.26% 0.41% 3.31% Swiss Performance Index, SPI 2.58% -3.53% 3.13% -0.51% 2.06% +0.38% +1.01% +0.13% +1.17% +1.58% Difference NAV as per quarterly filings * published on website, Bloomberg, etc. Share price 31.12.14 – Performance in USD % FY 2015 H1 2016 Q3 2016 ytd 16 30.09.16 Share price SWZ 1.41% -1.99% 5.33% 3.24% 4.69% Swiss Performance Index, SPI 2.58% -.353% 3.13% -0.51% 2.06% -1.17% +1.54% +2.20% +3.75% +2.63% Difference Source: Schroders, Citi and JPM for fund performance, Bloomberg for Index performance; year-to-date performance as at September 30, 2016. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 11

  13. Performance comment Driving factors behind relative performance Positive relative ytd 2016 (+1.2%):  small & mid cap overweight positive as they outperformed overall market positive contributions from: overweights in small and mid cap industrials and technology stocks underweight in the two large Swiss banks (UBS and Credit Suisse) Positive relative performance in 2015 (+0.4%):  small & mid cap overweight with positive performance contribution positive stock selection Source: Schroders, JPM, Bloomberg as of September 30, 2016 12

  14. positioning Portfolio

  15. Portfolio positioning As of 30 September 2016 Top ten holdings – absolute basis Top holdings - relative basis Name Absolute weight Name Relative weight Lindt & Sprüngli (Reg.) +3.4% Novartis 12.3% Logitech +2.7% Nestlé 11.9% Roche 11.1% Belimo +2.6% Syngenta Burckhardt Compression +2.0% 4.6% Tecan +2.0% UBS 4.2% Lindt & Sprüngli (Reg.) 4.0% Nestlé -7.8% Richemont 3.2% Novartis -4.3% Logitech 3.0% ABB -3.4% Belimo 2.8% Zurich Insurance -3.1% Credit Suisse 2.4% Roche -2.9% Total 59.5% Source: Schroders, JP Morgan, Bloomberg, September 30, 2016 14

  16. Portfolio positioning ICB classification SWZ SPI Rel. % Pharmaceuticals 23.3% 30.7% ‐ 7.3%* Food & Beverage 17.0% 21.5% ‐ 4.5% Industrial Goods & Services 8.4% 9.3% ‐ 0.9% Banks 10.5% 8.1% 2.4% Insurance 4.0% 6.9% ‐ 2.9% Chemicals 4.6% 5.3% ‐ 0.7% Construction & Materials 5.2% 4.7% 0.5% Personal & Household Goods 5.4% 3.6% 1.8% Biotechnology 3.5% 2.5% 1.0% Financial Services 2.5% 1.4% 1.1% Real Estate 0.0% 1.3% ‐ 1.3% Telecommunications 2.1% 1.2% 0.9% Swiss Helvetia Fund Technology 3.4% 1.1% 2.3% Medical Equipment SPI 4.5% 0.8% 3.7% Retail 0.0% 0.8% ‐ 0.8% Medical Supplies 0.0% 0.4% ‐ 0.4% Media 0.0% 0.1% ‐ 0.1% Utilities 0.0% 0.1% ‐ 0.1% Automobiles & Parts 0.0% 0.1% ‐ 0.1% Travel & Leisure 1.2% 0.1% 1.1% Basic Resources 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Health Care Providers 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Oil & Gas 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cash 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% Private Equity 3.6% 0.0% 3.6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Source: Schroders, JP Morgan, Bloomberg, September 30, 2016. * investment restrictions allowing only up to 25% of total assets to be invested in a single industry 15

  17. Portfolio positioning Most significant changes in positioning H1 2016 and Q3 2016 New Positions Increased Positions Decreased Positions Sold Positions Julius Baer Cembra Money Bank Actelion Adecco Swiss Re Forbo Basilea Dufry Valiant Sunrise Bucher Industries Evolva VAT Syngenta Kuros Biosciences Leonteq UBS Lindt & Spruengli Lonza Nestlé Actelion Aryzta Credit Suisse Swiss Life Adecco UBS Bucher Industries Source: Schroders, September 30, 2016; names in blue coloured text relate to portfolio actions in H1 2016, in orange in Q3 2016. Only changes >0.3% are shown 16

  18. Outlook

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend