POLI 120N: Contention and Conflict in Africa Professor Adida - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

poli 120n contention and conflict in africa professor
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

POLI 120N: Contention and Conflict in Africa Professor Adida - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POLI 120N: Contention and Conflict in Africa Professor Adida Electoral Violence Democratization in Africa 0 -2 avgpolity -4 -6 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 year Polity Score Country experts code countries on Executive recruitment


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Electoral Violence POLI 120N: Contention and Conflict in Africa Professor Adida

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

avgpolity 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 year

Democratization in Africa

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Polity Score

  • Country experts code countries on
  • Executive recruitment
  • Constraints on executive authority
  • Political competition
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

avgpolity 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 year

Sub-Saharan Africa

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

avgpolity 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 year

Democratization in Africa

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Democratization Factors

  • External influence

✓ Changes in WB model of development ✓ End of Cold War ✓ New technologies for mass communication ✓ French model (bicentennial) ✓ US aggressively promoting democracy by 1990

  • Internal influence

✓ Backlash against WB SAPs ✓ Legitimacy crisis ✓ Mandela’s release

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Q: True or False, according to the Polity project, Africa today is more autocratic than any other region of the world

  • a. True
  • b. False
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Democratization = Stability?

.8 .9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 avggdp 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 year

Democracy

2 4 6 8 GDP per capita (thousands) 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Year africagdp asiagdp lagdp menagdp

Growth

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Council on Foreign Relations

Democratization = Stability?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Arriola and Johnson 2012

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Arriola and Johnson 2012

1985-2005

slide-13
SLIDE 13

“... the crude simplicity of multiparty elections, which allows some

  • f the world’s most notorious autocrats to parade democratic

credentials without reforming their repressive regimes.”

Claude Ake (1991)

The electoral fallacy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

theguardian.com aviewfromthecave.com globalpost.com

slide-15
SLIDE 15

salon.com allafrica.com theguardian.com

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Electoral violence (Straus and Taylor)

  • Definition: physical violence and coercive intimidation

directly tied to an impending electoral contest or to an announced electoral result

  • Universe of cases: elections in SSA 1990-2007
  • Dimension variations
  • Who: incumbents vs. challengers
  • When: pre-vote vs. post-vote
  • Level of violence: high vs. low
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Broad patterns (S&T)

Dimensions Statistics

Incumbents perpetrate

85% of violent cases

Challengers perpetrate

19% of pre-election violent cases 40% of post-election violent cases

Pre-vote violence

94% of violent cases, 76% of high-violent cases

Post-vote violence

30% of violent cases; 37% of high-violent cases

High electoral violence

19% of elections

Harassment

39% of elections

No violence

42% of elections

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Determinants of electoral violence (S&T)

✓Smaller margin of victory ✓Less consolidated democracy ✓More migration; more group competition

  • ver resources

✓Middle-income ✓Past pathways to power

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Côte d’Ivoire, an example

www.revue-medias.com

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Côte d’Ivoire: prototype

✓Small margin of victory ✓Young democracy ✓Competition over resources, migrants/locals ✓Middle-income ✓Past pathways to power: coups and coercion

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Electoral Violence (A&J)

  • Politicians rely on patronage systems (corruption)

to lower stakes of office and reduce uncertainty associated with elections. When they no longer have access to corruption, the stakes of office go up, leading to electoral violence

  • Contrasts with Structural argument

Incumbent Opposition Business

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Determinants of electoral violence (A&J)

  • Test argument in 596 national elections held worldwide

1985-2005

slide-23
SLIDE 23

But Kenya?

Isn’t Kenya highly corrupt? Didn’t it experience violence?

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Useful to identify broad patterns (Straus and Taylor)
  • But when it comes to explaining electoral violence,

need to think about (Arriola and Johnson)

  • Actors
  • Preferences
  • Strategies
  • Political elites want to stay in power and employ a

menu of options to do so

  • Trade-off between corruption and electoral violence

In sum

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Q: Political scientists like to explain things like conflict and violence as the outcomes

  • f trade-offs leaders face. Which of the

following is not a trade-off we have discussed in this class?

  • a. Trade off between rebellions and coups
  • b. Trade off between winning a primary election

and winning a national election

  • c. Trade off between corruption and electoral

violence

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Electoral Violence POLI 120N: Contention and Conflict in Africa Professor Adida