Pitfalls and Promises BJ Brew and T Burdo October 26, 2016 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pitfalls and promises
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pitfalls and Promises BJ Brew and T Burdo October 26, 2016 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HAND Peripheral and CSF Biomarkers: Pitfalls and Promises BJ Brew and T Burdo October 26, 2016 Disclosures BJ Brew Relationships with commercial interests Grants: NIH, NHMRC; Research support: Biogen Idec, Viiv Patent: QUIN mAB


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HAND Peripheral and CSF Biomarkers: Pitfalls and Promises

BJ Brew and T Burdo October 26, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • BJ Brew
  • Relationships with commercial interests
  • Grants: NIH, NHMRC; Research support: Biogen Idec,

Viiv

  • Patent: QUIN mAB
  • Speakers Honoraria: Biogen Idec, Viiv, AbbVie
  • Employee of St Vincent’s Health Australia, University of

New South Wales, and University of Notre Dame

  • Tricia Burdo:
  • No relationships with commercial interests
  • No conflicts of interest
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview

  • Introduction
  • Principles and Pitfalls
  • Individual biomarkers
  • How each biomarker fits into a practical

framework

slide-4
SLIDE 4

INTRODUCTION

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ART has reduced the severity of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders

Pre ART

Adapted from: McArthur, J. C. et al. (2016) Nat. Rev. Neurol.

Post ART (after 1996)

The Therapeutic Paradox

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Cysique (C-S) Robertson ( C-S) Robertson ( L) Sevigny (L)

21

  • 59

319

  • 807

276

  • 717

15

  • 40

36 39 38 37.5

Neuropsychological impairment rates in those with plasma VL<50 cpml

21

  • 59

15

  • 40
slide-7
SLIDE 7

HIV comorbidities are associated with chronic low-grade inflammation

Adapted from: Freund. et al. (2010) Trends Molecular Med

Chronic Inflammation/ immune activation Cardiovascular disease Bone diseases Cancers Frality Metabolic diseases, diabetes HAND

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Monocyte and macrophages are important targets of HIV

Campbell, J. H. et al. (2014) AIDS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Changes of monocytes during HIV infection

Campbell, J. H. et al. (2014) AIDS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Overview of HAND pathogenesis pre cART

Adapted from Gonzalez-Scarano F et al. Nat Rev Immunol 2005;5:69-81

1 3 2 5 4

  • Autophagy*
  • ubiquitin

proteosome system

  • Immunoproteosome**

*Gougeon ML et al. Apoptosis 2009;14:501-508 **Nguyen TP, et al. Am J Pathol 2010;176:893-902

Neurotropism: CCR5 > CXCR4

Migration of microbial translocation products

slide-11
SLIDE 11

HAND Cellular Pathogenesis

Macrophages:

  • Critical to HIV mediated

neuropathogenesis

  • Serve as viral reservoirs within

the CNS

  • Release inflammatory mediators

and neurotoxic viral and host proteins

  • Central to HIV-associated

neuroinflammation and neurocognitive dysfunction Astrocytes are also crucial but monocytes/macrophages are important from a systemic perspective

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Possible causes of sustained CNS inflammation during ART

  • Latent and low level infection in the brain (CSF viral escape)
  • Microglia priming (circulating products translocated from gut)
  • Macrophages- harbors HIV, produce virions and are long-lived
  • Disturbed cellular energy (infected macrophages release ATP)
  • Neuronal and synaptic protein dynamics are altered
  • Contributions from cerebrovascular dysfunction, metabolic

alterations, ART regimens

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PRINCIPLES AND PITFALLS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Principles

  • 1. HAND has a unitary pathogenesis:

– HAND with viral suppression = HAND without viral suppression? – HAND with HIV encephalitis = HAND without HIV encephalitis (just less inflammation)? – ANI/MND have the same pathogenetic pathway?

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Principles

  • HAND has a unitary pathogenesis:

– HAND with viral suppression = driven by viral components eg tat nef etc? – HAND without viral suppression = driven by whole virus especially env?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

HAND + HIVE = HAND – HIVE?

Modified from Desplats et al Neurol 2013

12

  • 59

12

  • 32

10

  • 32

10

  • 32

12

  • 32

12

  • 32

10

  • 32

10

  • 32

10

  • 32

10

  • 32

Neuropsychological impairment

Severe 6/6 Severe 6/6 Severe 6/6 Mild/mod 5/9 6/8 Mild/mod 5/9 6/8 Mild/mod 5/9 6/8

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Gelman et al PLoS One 2012

HAND + HIVE = HAND – HIVE?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

ANI/MND have the same pathogenetic pathway?

  • 3 cases of ANI = HIVE (Cherner et al J Nvirol 2007)
  • 10 cases of mild/moderate neuropsychological

impairment = latent HIV only (Desplats et al Neurol 2013)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

HAND NEUROVIROLOGY BRAIN

Latent infection Productive infection ANI/MND HAD

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Principles

  • 2. HAND is driven by systemic and CNS

(CSF/brain) disease (HIV/inflammation)

  • But:

– Systemic and CNS equally? – To differing extents at different time points in HIV disease course?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Mild HAND is prevalent It is driven by compartmentalized brain viral latency burden/activity Mild HAND is Relatively uncommon It is driven by peripheral viral latency burden/activity It is driven by latency burden/activity Relatively uncommon latency burden/activity HIV-associated dementia BBB disrupted Peripheral & CNS viral latency

Cysique and Brew unpublished

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Principles

  • 3. Activity of HAND:

– Progressing – Regressing – Stable but subclinically active: “simmering pot” – Stable inactive: “legacy” ?evidence

  • 4. Reparative and remodelling aspects:

emerging evidence

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Modified from Cysique et al Neurology 2009 Differing Biomarker effects

EFFECT OF RECENT ARV CHANGE ON BIOMARKER INTERPRETATION

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Cysique et al under review

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Principles

  • 5. Account for confounds:

– Substance misuse – Hepatitis C – Overlap with other conditions associated with aging:

  • Vascular disease
  • Degenerative: Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s
slide-27
SLIDE 27

H I V

A G E

Pathogenesis of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Pathogenic insult misfolded protein stress/toxic proteins mitochondrial dysfunction inflammation transcription dysregulation excitotoxicity Oxidative/Nitrosative stress cell dysfunction/death Defence failure: Hsps, ER chaperones, Ubiquitin-proteasome, autophagy, Pic, ?PgP inflammation Modified from Brew et al J Neuroimm Pharm 2009 proteasome, autophagy, Pic, ?PgP mitochondrial dysfunction Defence failure: proteasome, autophagy, Pic, ?PgP

A R V

slide-28
SLIDE 28

CSF Biomarkers and Age Effect

De Oliveira et al Sci Rep 2015

slide-29
SLIDE 29

A new model of chronic HAND pathogenesis?

HIV HIV duration

Age CVD cART

↓NAA ↓NAA ↑ mIo ↓NAA ↑ mIo

  • Inflammation

Inflammation

Inflammatio n ~ ↑ neopterin ~ ↑ Cr

Cysique et al PLoS One 2014

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Principles

  • 6. Universality-Selectivity:
  • all patients are vulnerable?
  • It is now clear that only some patients are

susceptible – –The principle of selectivity

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Principles

  • Biomarkers must developed within latter

framework accounting for concepts of activity and repair

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Principles: Approach

Price et al Neurology 2007

Metabolic Vascular Trophic S1oob neopterin

Marcotte et al JNIP 2013

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Suggested Solutions

  • “Clean” large data sets (not a “wash out”

strategy)

  • Well characterised:

– Presence and duration of viral suppression – ARV history – CD4 history – HAND history – Neuropathology

slide-34
SLIDE 34

PERIPHERAL BIOMARKERS

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Tricia Burdo, Ph.D. Associate Professor Neuroscience 215-707-1618 (office) burdot@temple.edu (email)

Peripheral biomarkers in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Biomarkers of HIV-associated dementia (HAD) before ART

Decrease CD4+ T cells: current if naïve - permissive effect when <200 cells/μl, even <350 cells/μl (Bhaskaran K et al Ann Neurol 2008) Nadir if experienced (Cysique LA et al. Neurology 2006, Valcour V et al. J

Neurovirol 2006, Robertson et al 2007)

Anaemia Low Platelets Impaired glucose tolerance esp diabetes (Valcour V et al JAIDS 2005) Plasma viral load CSF viral load CCL2 IL-6 sCD14 Neopterin Kynurenine Quinolinic acid

But none is specific for HAND

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Elevated CD16+ monocytes [Pulliam Lancet 1997,Williams Clin Invest 2005,

Campbell Plos One 2011]

Elevated sCD14 (receptor for LPS) [Lyons 2011, Ancuta 2008, Royal 2016] Elevated sCD163 (Burdo 2013, Royal 2016)- increased in MND Neither correlate with npsych/HAND but none on cART (McGuire JNvirol 2015) Loss of CCR2+ CD14loCD16hi monos (Ndhlovu 2015) CCR2+ on CD14+CD16+ (increased in HAND, not differentiate between ANI, MDN, HAD)

(Williams 2014 Neurology)

High HIV DNA levels in CD16+ monocytes [Kusao 2012, Valcour et al 2013, Cysique et al 2015] Vascular disease: HT, CVD, hypercholesterolaemia (Wright et al 2010)

Peripheral biomarkers of HAND

CCR2+ on CD14+CD16+ (increased in HAND, not differentiate between ANI, MDN, HAD) Monocyte related

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Micro RNAs

  • HAND associations:

miR-3665 > miR-4516 > miR-4707–5p

  • But: small n, no ANI, not virally suppressed

Asahchop et al AIDS 2016

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Plasma NFL elevated in HAD

Gisslen, 2016

But NFL is quickly hydrolysed – cannot use stored samples

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Insights from the SIV-infected rhesus macaque model

CD16+ monocytes peak during acute infection and with AIDS

Williams K., J Clin Invest 2005 Burdo T., PLoS Pathogens 2010 Monocyte expansion in the first weeks of infection predicts the rate

  • f disease progression
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Burdo et al. PLos Pathogens, 2010

Monocyte expansion from bone marrow correlates with rapid AIDS, severity of SIVE and sCD163 levels sCD163 plasma is the best correlate of BrdU monocytes

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Shedding of the scavenger receptor CD163

CD163 exclusively expressed on monocytes and M2 macrophages (Zwadlo, Exp Cell Bio, 1987, Pulford,

  • Immunol. 1992, Backe, J. Clin. Pathol. 1991)

CD14+CD16+ monocytes have the highest expression

  • f CD163 (Buechler, JLB 2000)

CD163 is a receptor for bacteria, CD163 on tissue macrophages acts as an innate immune receptor and inducer of local inflammation (Fabriek Blood 2009) Shedding of sCD163 occurs following activation of TLR- 4 by LPS; crosslinking of the Fcg receptor; oxidative stress, PMA or thrombin stimulation (Hintz, J Leukoc

Biol 2002; Weaver, J Leukoc Biol 2006; Sulahian, J Leukoc Biol 2006; Chung, Thromb Res 2011).

The simultaneous release of CD163 and TNF-α is mediated by the enzyme ADAM17/TACE under inflammatory stimuli (Etzerodt, J Leukoc Biol 2010)

Moller, Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2012

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Burdo et al. JID 2011

sCD163 plasma is elevated in chronic and early HIV- infected subjects and monocyte activation persists with ART

slide-44
SLIDE 44

sCD163 is elevated in plasma of impaired HIV- infected patients

Burdo et al. AIDS, 2013

slide-45
SLIDE 45

sCD163 decreased in patients that remained unimpaired

sCD163 levels dropped in patients who were stably GDS- unimpaired across visits Levels remained elevated in those who remained GDS- impaired

Burdo et al. AIDS, 2013

slide-46
SLIDE 46

CSF BIOMARKERS

slide-47
SLIDE 47

NEURAL BIOMARKERS

slide-48
SLIDE 48

CSF NFL

  • Correlates with HAND severity (Gisslen et al 2005)
  • Decreases with cART (Mellgren et al Neurol 2007)
  • Predicts HAND (Gisslen et al JID 2007) SIVE (Beck et al Eur J

Pharmacol 2015)

  • Not correlated with plasma sCD14 or

sCD163 at least in ARV naïve pts (McGuire et al J

Nvirol 2015) Brown et al Mol Neurodegen 2014

slide-49
SLIDE 49

CSF NFL

Gisslen et al EBioMedicine 2016

slide-50
SLIDE 50

?sensitive enough for ANI/MND in suppressed pts

Peterson et al 2015

slide-51
SLIDE 51

CSF NFL

McGuire et al JNvirol 2015

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Tau

  • Microtubule associated protein largely

found in the CNS

  • Inflammation can phosphorylate tau
  • The major reasons for discordant results in

HIV relate to:

– Differing ages of patient – Differing ARV history

Brown et al Mol Neurodegen 2014

slide-53
SLIDE 53

CSF S100b

  • Mainly a marker of astrocytes
  • Pro-inflammatory
  • Inhibits GFAP
  • Neurotoxic
  • Correlates with HAND severity (Pemberton Brew 2001,

Woods et al JCEN 2010)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

CSF GFAP

  • Mainly a marker of fibrillary astrocytes
  • Variable and limited data on rel’p to HAND

(Sporer 2001) (Andersson 2006)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

CSF Neopterin

  • Macrophage/microglia marker
  • Correlates with HAND severity in ART naïve

(Brew et al Ann Neurol 1990) and SIV (Beck et al Eur J Pharmacol 2015)

  • Predicts HAND (Pemberton JID 1996)
  • Common for mild elevation despite suppressive

cART (Yilmaz et al 2013)

  • ?Evidence for neurotoxicity
  • Correlates with plasma sCD163

Brown et al Mol Neurodegen 2014

slide-56
SLIDE 56

CSF BBB

Calcagno et al J Nvirol 2016

slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58

IMMUNOLOGICAL BIOMARKERS

slide-59
SLIDE 59

CSF sCD14

  • Soluble form of the monocyte

lipopolysaccharide (LPS) receptor which is cleaved and released from the membrane following the activation of monocytes

  • Correlates with HAND severity (Lyons et al 2011)

Brown et al Mol Neurodegen 2014

slide-60
SLIDE 60

CSF sCD163

McGuire et al JNvirol 2015

slide-61
SLIDE 61

CSF Neopterin and NFL and sCD14

Jespersen et al BMC inf Dis 2016

slide-62
SLIDE 62

CSF Kynurenine Pathway and cART in SIV

Drewes et al J Nvirol 2015

slide-63
SLIDE 63

CSF QUIN/TRP Predicts SIVE

slide-64
SLIDE 64

CSF CCL2

  • Correlates with HAND Severity and risk

(Sevigny et al 2004) (Anderson et al J Nvirol 2015) (Thames et al AIDS 2015)

  • Correlates with neopterin (Price 2007 Neurology)
slide-65
SLIDE 65

CSF YKL-40

  • Human cartilage glycoprotein 39
  • Expressed on chondrocytes, synoviocytes,

neutrophils, and monocytes in several chronic inflammatory and neoplastic conditions (Bonneh-Barkay et al, 2008).

  • Correlated with SIVE and increased CSF

viral load (Bonneh-Barkay et al, 2008).

  • Emerging data on correlation with HAND

severity

slide-66
SLIDE 66

CSF microRNAs

  • miR125b (MMPs and cell-death proteins)

and 146a (microglial infection)

  • Correlate with HIVE (Pacifici J Cell Physiol 2013) but:

– Small study (10 pts: 9 HAND – 4 with HIVE) – No data on ARVs or viral suppression

slide-67
SLIDE 67

CSF microRNAs

Pacific et al J Cell Physiol

slide-68
SLIDE 68

CSF MicroRNAs

slide-69
SLIDE 69

VIRAL BIOMARKERS

slide-70
SLIDE 70
slide-71
SLIDE 71

CSF HIV DNA

  • Insensitive – even with digital droplet PCR:

2 of 44 pts (de Oliveira et al Sci Rep 2015)

  • ?related to insufficient volume of CSF
  • Issue of practicality….
slide-72
SLIDE 72

TROPHIC FACTOR BIOMARKERS

slide-73
SLIDE 73

CSF Progranulin

  • Expressed by both neurons and microglia
  • Neuronal growth factor and modulator of

neuroinflammation

  • Lowered in HAND on suppressive cART

(Suh et al PLoS One 2014)

  • ?through lack of neurotrophic support
  • Elevated in HIVE off cART (Suh et al PLoS One 2014)
slide-74
SLIDE 74

CSF Insulin Like Growth Factors

  • Pathway is disturbed but ?significance for

HAND (Suh et al J Neuroinflamm)

slide-75
SLIDE 75

CSF Growth Factors and HAND with cART

(HIVE: defects in adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus (Avraham et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2013)

slide-76
SLIDE 76

METABOLIC BIOMARKERS

slide-77
SLIDE 77

CSF Sphingolipids and Ceramide

  • Sphingolipids elevated in mild-moderate

HAND

  • Ceramide elevated in more severe HAND
  • Similarity to lysosomal storage diseases
  • Shift from single to mutiple lipid specis with

HAND progression (Bandaru et al Neurol 2013)

slide-78
SLIDE 78

CSF Lipids in HAND

Rahman and He Prog Neurobiol 2015

slide-79
SLIDE 79

LATENCY BIOMARKERS

slide-80
SLIDE 80

HAND BIOMARKERS

Desplats et al Neurol 2013

slide-81
SLIDE 81

PRACTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR BIOMARKERS

slide-82
SLIDE 82

How Can CSF Biomarkers Help?

  • Diagnosis:

– Presence – Severity – Activity

  • Prediction:

– HAND development – HAND treatment response: balance of “drivers”

  • Immunological > viral?
  • Identify and quantify latency
slide-83
SLIDE 83

+ CART Sensitivity Activity Devlpmnt Response Latency NFL yes Excellent Very good Very good Very good ? Tau No Very good Very good ? Very good ? S100b ? Yes Very good ? ? ? ? GFAP ? ? ? ? ? ? Neopterin Yes Very good Very good ?yes yes ? BBB ?no Good ? ? ? ? sCD14/sCD163 ? Very good ? ? ? ? QUIN/TRP Yes (SIV) Very good ? ? ? ? CCL2 ?yes Very good ? ? ? ? YKL-40 ? Good ? ? ? ? MicroRNA ? Good ? ? ? ? HIV DNA ? Poor ? ? ? ? HIV RNA (SCA) Yes Good ? ? ? ? Growth Factors ? ? ? ? ? ? Lipids Yes Good yes ? ? ? BCL11b ? ? ? ? ? ?yes

More work needed

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Collaborators and funding

Steve Grinspoon Markella Zanni Sara Looby Janet Lo Mabel Toribio Katie Fitch Suman Srinivasa

Ken Williams Patrick Autissier

TB’s Funding: R01 NS082116 (PI) U01 HL123336 (PI, sub) R01 AI123001 (PI, sub) R01 NR015738 (PI, sub)

  • Dr. Burdo has no disclosures

Burdo Lab: Jessica Lakritz Jake Robinson

Ron Ellis Scott Letendre Xavier Alvarez Cecily Midkiff Andrew Miller Walter Royal

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Acknowledgements

  • Lucette Cysique

UNSW

  • Melissa Churchill

RMIT

  • Louise Pemberton

CSU

  • Edwina Wright

Burnet Centre

  • Magnus Gisslen

Sahlgrenska University

  • Richard Price

UCSF