phishing detection using semi supervised methods with new
play

Phishing Detection Using Semi-Supervised Methods with New Features - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ReDAS Lab Phishing Detection Using Semi-Supervised Methods with New Features Victor Zeng Advisor: Rakesh M. Verma COMPUTER SCIENCE Motivation Phishing is the act of sending fake emails to trick a user into doing something.


  1. ReDAS Lab Phishing Detection Using Semi-Supervised Methods with New Features Victor Zeng Advisor: Rakesh M. Verma COMPUTER SCIENCE

  2. Motivation • Phishing is the act of sending fake emails to trick a user into doing something. • Beachhead for 95% of attacks on enterprise networks • Average cost: $1.6 Million • Cannot depend on user to identify phishing emails • Creating labeled training data is expensive Source: Eitan Katz. Phishing statistics: What every business needs to know, May 2019

  3. Goal • Improve upon the current state-of-the-art THEMIS model • Publish a paper based on my results

  4. Objectives • Identify new features which can be used for phishing detection • Use semi-supervised methods to detect phishing emails

  5. Expected Impact • Improve performance of phishing detection methods • Decrease the amount of labeled data required to train phishing detection models

  6. Deliverables • Code + Documentation • Poster • Report • Paper • Final Presentation

  7. Methods: Objective 1 Perform exploratory Implement feature in analysis on proposed PhishBench 2.0 feature Evaluate multi-feature Evaluate single-feature performance with performance with PhishBench 2.0 PhishBench 2.0

  8. Results: Objective 1 • Spellcheck ratio feature • Statistically different between phish and legit emails (p-value: 1.512e-22) • Random Forest identifies 54% of phish emails in single feature test

  9. Conclusions • Spellcheck ratio is a promising feature for phishing detection

  10. Methods: Objective 2 Extend PhishBench 2.0 to support semi-supervised methods Implement semi-supervised methods in PhishBench 2.0 Evaluate performance of semi-supervised methods against pre-existing supervised methods

  11. Remaining Work • Evaluate features from Statement Analysis • Acquire additional datasets • Work for Objective 2

  12. Acknowledgements The REU project is sponsored by NSF under award NSF-1659755. Special thanks to the following UH offices for providing financial support to the project: Department of Computer Science; College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics; Dean of Graduate and Professional Studies; VP for Research; and the Provost's Office. The views and conclusions contained in this presentation are those of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the sponsors.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend