pf adamo g burns pf adamo g burns
play

PF Adamo, G Burns PF Adamo, G Burns Montreal, CA, ACVIM June 2009 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CERVICAL ARTHROPLASTY CERVICAL ARTHROPLASTY IN DOGS WITH DISC ASSOCIATED CAUDAL IN DOGS WITH DISC ASSOCIATED CAUDAL CERVICAL SPONDYLOMYELOPATHY AND CERVICAL SPONDYLOMYELOPATHY AND CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION. CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION.


  1. CERVICAL ARTHROPLASTY CERVICAL ARTHROPLASTY IN DOGS WITH DISC ASSOCIATED CAUDAL IN DOGS WITH DISC ASSOCIATED CAUDAL CERVICAL SPONDYLOMYELOPATHY AND CERVICAL SPONDYLOMYELOPATHY AND CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION. CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION. PRELIMINARY STUDY IN TWO CASES PRELIMINARY STUDY IN TWO CASES PF Adamo, G Burns PF Adamo, G Burns Montreal, CA, ACVIM June 2009

  2. Objectives Objectives 1. To evaluate in dogs w cervical disc To evaluate in dogs w cervical disc 1. diseases the efficacy of an artificial disc diseases the efficacy of an artificial disc designed for the dog cervical spine designed for the dog cervical spine Evaluation Evaluation a) Implant migration Implant migration a) b) Ability to maintain distraction over time Ability to maintain distraction over time b) c) Mobility at the treated vertebral unit c) Mobility at the treated vertebral unit

  3. Phase 1: design Phase 1: design Two endplates Stainless steel a. In the center of inside surface of each endplate respectively: i. Concavity and convexity acts like a ball and the socket. b. External surface of each endplate: i. convexity to prevent implant migration ii. concentric grooves to allow bone in growth into the implant . Patent # US2008/0306597 A1 Patent # US2008/0306597 A1

  4. � Two breakable fins attached to the dorsal portion of each end plate: TO FACILITATE HOLDING AND PLACEMENT OF THE IMPLANT � Breaking point of the fins at the attachment to each end plate . � Once the disc is implanted the fins are detached from the prosthesis by twisting each fin along its long axis.

  5. Phase 2: in vitro Phase 2: in vitro biomechanical testing biomechanical testing •In vitro Biomechanical Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, Ventral Slot Procedure, and Smooth Pins with Polymethylmethacrylate Fixation at Treated and Adjacent Canine Cervical Motion Units Adamo, Kobayashi et al. Vet Surgery 2007 Flexion/Extension Axial compression Lateral bending Torsion 1) 4 Groups of 6 cervical spines 2) Treated Vertebral Space C5-6 3) Prosthesis, Ventral Slot, Pin+PMMA fixation, and normal spine

  6. Effect of cervical level on the mechanical properties of each group (1-way-ANOVA) and effect of group at each cervical level (repeated measure ANOVA). Difference significant at a probability level of 95% (p<0.05). � Overall the artificial disc was better able to Overall the artificial disc was better able to � mimic the behavior of intact spine compared mimic the behavior of intact spine compared with ventral slot and Pin+PMMA groups. with ventral slot and Pin+PMMA groups.

  7. Phase 3: pilot clinical study Phase 3: pilot clinical study Titanium alloy (Ti 6AI-4V ELI) Including criteria � Two owned client dogs with cervical disc disease Two owned client dogs with cervical disc disease � � Weight Weight � • no less then 50 lb (22 kg) • no less then 50 lb (22 kg) � Diagnosis: Diagnosis: � • history, clinical signs, confirmed on MRI • history, clinical signs, confirmed on MRI � MRI: 1.5 T magnet and cervical spine array coil MRI: 1.5 T magnet and cervical spine array coil � • T1,T2 weighted images, Proton density, Flair T1,T2 weighted images, Proton density, Flair • • Sagittal and transverse plane + sagittal traction Sagittal and transverse plane + sagittal traction • � MDB: MDB: � • CBC, Chemistry panel and Thoracic radiographs • CBC, Chemistry panel and Thoracic radiographs � Consent form and study participation agreement Consent form and study participation agreement �

  8. Treatment Treatment � Spinal decompression by Ventral slot + Spinal decompression by Ventral slot + � Implantation of the prosthesis Implantation of the prosthesis � 6 wks neck brace + restricted activity 6 wks neck brace + restricted activity � Follow- -up up Follow � Serial X Serial X- -rays rays � • Time 0, 2 • Time 0, 2 - - 6 wks, 3 6 wks, 3 – – 6 months and 1 year 6 months and 1 year • VD, LL, stress views (traction, dorso/ventral flexion) • VD, LL, stress views (traction, dorso/ventral flexion) Rescue plan Rescue plan � migration of device, radiological signs of infection, migration of device, radiological signs of infection, � and persistent neurologic signs, and persistent neurologic signs, • a course of NSAID +/ a course of NSAID +/- - antibiotic therapy antibiotic therapy • • removal of the prosthesis w conversion to standard removal of the prosthesis w conversion to standard • ventral slot if medical management not effective ventral slot if medical management not effective

  9. • Sizes of the prosthesis . 6 different sizes. Disc A (mm) B (mm) C (mm) D (mm) E (mm) sm 1 9.0 10.5 7.4 6.3 4.5 sm 2 10.5 10.5 7.4 7.0 5.2 sm 3 12 10.5 7.4 7.8 5.9 Med 1 9.0 11.3 8.5 6.3 4.5 Med 2 10.7 11.3 8.5 7.1 5.4 Med 3 12 11.3 8.5 7.8 5.9 A: assembled width; B: outside diameter; C: width of the flat; D: thickness of the convex part; E: thickness of the concave side.

  10. Implant Size Selection:

  11. � Dog 1 Dog 1 � • 4 y old M intact Doberman • 4 y old M intact Doberman Pincher, 31 kg Pincher, 31 kg • Acute onset cervical pain & Acute onset cervical pain & • ataxia ataxia • Neuro Neuro- -exam exam • � Cervical pain, ataxia Cervical pain, ataxia � • MRI: MRI: • ary to � Acute myelopathy 2 Acute myelopathy 2 ary to � C6- C6 -C7 Disc Herniation C7 Disc Herniation

  12. � Dog 2 Dog 2 � • 8 y old MN Labrador Mix, 23 kg • 8 y old MN Labrador Mix, 23 kg • 4 months progressive ataxia/tetraparesis • 4 months progressive ataxia/tetraparesis • Neuro Neuro- -exam: exam: • � Cervical pain, amb. tetraparesis, CP deficits all 4 limbs Cervical pain, amb. tetraparesis, CP deficits all 4 limbs � • MRI: MRI: • ary to C5 � Chronic myelopathy 2 Chronic myelopathy 2 ary to C5- -C6 disc disease C6 disc disease � � + dorsolateral encroachment of the spinal cord + dorsolateral encroachment of the spinal cord � � �

  13. Surgical technique Ventral slot and spinal decompression

  14. Placement of Caspar cervical retractor

  15. •Maximal distraction •Milling each vertebral end-plate with burr to create a concavity shape •Placement of the prosthesis

  16. Maximal DISTRACTION

  17. Distraction released

  18. Fins are twisted and de-attached from the implant

  19. The Caspar retractor is removed before closure

  20. � time 0: immediate post time 0: immediate post- -op op � Dog 1 Dog 2

  21. � 2 weeks post 2 weeks post- -op op � Dog 1 Neutral Linear traction Dog 2 Neutral Linear traction

  22. � 3 months post 3 months post- -op op � Dog 1 Neutral Linear traction Neutral Linear traction Dog 2

  23. � 6 months post 6 months post- -op op Dog 1 � Dog 1 Neutral Linear traction Ventro-Flexion Dorso-flexion

  24. � 6 months post 6 months post- -op op Dog 2 � Dog 2 Neutral Linear traction Ventro-Flexion Dorso-flexion

  25. � 12 months post 12 months post- -op op Dog 1 Dog 1 � Neutral Linear traction Ventro-Flexion Dorso-flexion

  26. Results : clinical outcome : clinical outcome Results � Dog 1 Dog 1 � • Complete neurologic recovery, with Complete neurologic recovery, with • two occasional episodes of cervical two occasional episodes of cervical pain during the first 2 wks post- -op, op, pain during the first 2 wks post resolved with NSAID. resolved with NSAID. • up to 12 month re up to 12 month re- -check: check: • Neurologic normal Neurologic normal � � � Dog 2 Dog 2 � • Improved during the first 2 months Improved during the first 2 months • post- -op, less ataxic and less CP op, less ataxic and less CP post deficits. deficits. • 6 month post 6 month post- -op: op: • � mild ataxia without CP deficits except for mild ataxia without CP deficits except for � mild delayed in hopping reaction on left mild delayed in hopping reaction on left front limb front limb

  27. Results: X X- -Rays Rays Results: � Immediate post Immediate post- -op X op X- -rays: rays: � • implant was well seated in the slot providing implant was well seated in the slot providing • good distraction. good distraction. � In all post In all post- -op X op X- -rays: rays: � • distraction was maintained with no evidence of distraction was maintained with no evidence of • ventral bridging spondylosis at the treated ventral bridging spondylosis at the treated site. site. � Not migration and not signs of infectious Not migration and not signs of infectious � � Mild degree of mobility at the treated site 1 year Mild degree of mobility at the treated site 1 year � post- -op in Dog 1, which decreased over time op in Dog 1, which decreased over time post � �

  28. Conclusions Conclusions � Cervical arthroplasty was well tolerated in Cervical arthroplasty was well tolerated in � both dogs, maintained distraction and both dogs, maintained distraction and prevented bridging spondylosis. prevented bridging spondylosis. � Limitations: Limitations: � • Number of cases treated Number of cases treated • • Different type of discs cervical diseases treated Different type of discs cervical diseases treated • � This procedure is promising and warrants This procedure is promising and warrants � further study further study

Recommend


More recommend