Perspectives on Sustainable Transport Lew Fulton Director, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

perspectives on sustainable transport
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Perspectives on Sustainable Transport Lew Fulton Director, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Perspectives on Sustainable Transport Lew Fulton Director, Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways (STEPS) Program ARPA-E Vehicle Energy Storage Technologies Annual Program Review March 25, 2016 To cover today The climate imperative


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lew Fulton

Director, Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways (STEPS) Program

ARPA-E Vehicle Energy Storage Technologies Annual Program Review March 25, 2016

Perspectives on Sustainable Transport

slide-2
SLIDE 2

To cover today

  • The climate imperative – COP-21
  • Challenges – Oil
  • Challenges – biofuels and NG
  • Challenges – electric drive vehicles
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Fuel Cell Vehicle Modeling Program 1998-2002

FCV Technology

Hydrogen Pathways 2003-2006

FCVs & H2 Fuel Pathway

STEPS 2007-2010

Fuel/Vehicle Pathway Analyses & Comparisons

NextSTEPS 2011-2014

Scenarios & Transition Strategies

1998-----------------------------------------------------------------2014-------------------2018 STEPS is the leading global forum of low-carbon transportation stakeholders

STEPS3 2015-2018

Critical Transition Dynamics

3

We generate visions of fuel and vehicle futures grounded in technical and economic realities, a strong knowledge base for companies making long- term technology investments, and sophisticated analyses of future policies.

  • Modeling and analyzing alternative fuel transitions
  • Preparing scientific analysis and convening policy and business decision makers
  • Training next generation leaders in transportation and energy
slide-4
SLIDE 4

We use our STEPS research framework to analyze and compare alternative fuel and vehicle transitions

4

Hydrogen

Fuel Cell Vehicles

Biofuels

Bio-ICE Vehicles 2nd Gen Biofuels

Electricity

Battery-electric Plug-in hybrids

Fossil Fuels

BAU Natural Gas Low-carbon fuels (incl. CCS)

Transition Dynamics

  • Consumer Demand & Behavior
  • Innovation & Business Strategy

Models & Analyses

  • Infrastructure System Analysis
  • Env./Energy/Econ. Cost Analyses
  • Vehicle Technology Evaluation
  • Mobility, VMT, Travel Behavior

Policy Analysis

  • Market instruments
  • Fuel requirements
  • Sustainability standards

Integrative Scenarios & Transition Strategies

Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways (STEPS) Program at ITS-Davis

slide-5
SLIDE 5

STEPS has world’s top leaders on alternative fuels, transportation, oil and gas, EVs, and scenarios modeling

Joan Ogden, Professor/STEPS Director: world’s top expert on economic assessment of fuels, esp. hydrogen Lew Fulton, STEPS Director: leading analyst on global sustainable transport scenarios, formerly at IEA Dan Sperling, Professor/STEPS Co-Director/ITS-Davis Founding Director: leading global expert on sustainable transportation and policy Amy Myers Jaffe, Exec. Dir., Energy & Sustainability: leading global expert on oil and gas and sustainable energy Andy Burke, Research Engineer: leading expert on vehicle technology evaluations, esp. batteries and supercapacitors Sonia Yeh, Research Engineer: leading energy modeling known for innovative strategies on big data, GIS mapping and national policy Tom Turrentine, Dir., PH&EV Research Center: consumer response to alternative vehicles, esp. PEV market

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

STEPS 2015-2018 Consortium Members

6

California Air Resources Board

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Observations on the Climate Conference (COP-21) in Paris, Dec 2015

www.steps.ucdavis.edu Lew Fulton, Co-Director, Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways (STEPS), UC Davis

H2

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Two degrees: mostly unburnable carbon

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Outcomes from Paris COP-21

  • 195 Nations signed an agreement on a new post-2020

framework with targets and mechanisms

  • The 2 degree goal was retained, with much text around the

need for a 1.5 degree target.

  • Financing mechanisms were strengthened
  • Nationally determined commitments were announced
  • Adaptation/resiliency plans were strengthened

Worst acronym award: CBDRRCILNDC- “Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities In the Light of Different National Circumstances”

  • Slightly better is “INDC” – Intended Nationally Determined

Contributions

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The U.S. INDC

  • 26-28% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2025, compared to

2005

  • Commitments across sectors not specified, but key elements

include: – Clean Power plan – 30% reduction in CO2 by 2030 – Buildings, appliance standards – Transportation also expected to play a major role:

  • Fuel economy/CO2 standards for cars and trucks
  • Alternative fuel initiatives
  • Travel-related policies?

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

INDC Commitments for Selected Countries

All energy-related CO2 emissions per capita for selected countries, for 2014 and explicit or implied targets for 2030 (based on analysis conducted by climateactiontracker.org, using national INDC reports; for 2030 approximate midpoints are used where a range of targets or uncertainty in targets may exist; these are meant to be indicative and are not official numbers). Full blog describing this is located at: http://its.ucdavis.edu/blog-post/paris-climate-accord-a-strong-call-to-action-including-transportation/ Target data is based on: http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china.html

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Transportation Measures Mentioned in INDC plans

Typology of Transport Mitigation Strategies in Intended Nationally- Determined Contributions (SLOCAT, 2015)

http://its.ucdavis.edu/blog-post/an-american-transportation-researcher-in-paris-report-from-cop21-the-global-climate-conference/

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Paris Declaration on Electro-Mobility and Climate Change & Call to Action

Released in Paris during COP21, signed by 20+ organizations including UN, auto manufacturers and NGOs (and groups representing them). http://newsroom.unfccc.int/lpaa/transport/the-paris-declaration-on-electro-mobility-and-climate- change-and-call-to-action/ Key clauses:

With varying mandates, capabilities, and circumstances, we commit to advance our work individually as well as collectively wherever possible to increase electro- mobility to levels compatible with a less-than 2-degree pathway….We also call on governments at all levels, businesses, cooperative initiatives, and others to commit to this Declaration, take action, and advance global momentum for electro-mobility. According to the International Energy Agency, this transition will require… at least 20 percent of all road transport vehicles globally to be electrically driven by 2030 If warming is to be limited to 2 Degrees or less. Of this, light vehicles would primarily contribute: more than 400 Million two and three-Wheelers in 2030, Up from roughly 230 Million today; and more than 100 Million cars in 2030,

Up from 1 Million today.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

One global 2oC Transport Scenario

  • Transport part of a global effort; electricity and hydrogen key for cars and trucks

Fulton et al, 2015, in Biofuels, Biorefining and Bioproducts”

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2010 2030 2050 2075 2010 2030 2050 2075 2010 2030 2050 2075 2010 2030 2050 2075 2010 2030 2050 2075 2010 2030 2050 2075 2010 2030 2050 2075 PLDV Bus Rail Air Road freight Rail Water Passenger transport Freight transport EJ Electricity Hydrogen CNG/LPG GTL/CTL Biofuel Kerosene HFO Diesel Gasoline

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CARB Scenario to Achieve 2030 & 2050 GHG Targets (-40% and -80%)

Air Resources Board

ICEVs

→ 90% ZEV/PHEV sales by 2050 (2/3 of on-road vehicles)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

‹#›

Disruptive Factors and Obstacles

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2002–2015 up-end of the price cycle was mainly driven by three characteristics that no longer prevail:

  • “Peak Oil” theory
  • Steady, rapid Chinese “demand” based on industrial

growth

  • Rising upstream services costs

“Three major linchpins to high oil price psychological exuberance have dissipated“

  • Amy Jaffe, UC Davis
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Potential disruptors in the supply&demand balance of oil are mostly driven population growth and economic development, new technological developments on both production and consumption, and regulatory restrictions to carbon emissions.

Potential disruptors in the supply & demand balance of oil

slide-19
SLIDE 19

We’ve looked at factors outside of policies that could result in flatter oil demand trends

19

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Oil Consumption (million bbl/day)

Range of Oil Projection Scenarios Business as Usual "Kitchen Sink"

  • Possible stagnation of oil demand through 2035 before growth

resumes

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What is available to achieve a two degree scenario?

  • A very quick look at:

– Biofuels – Natural gas – Fuel cells/hydrogen

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Rise and Fall of Biofuels in the Minds of the EIA

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Projected Volumes (Billion Gallons of Gasoline Equivalent) Corn Ethanol Cellulosic Ethanol Biodiesel Other Biofuel Net Imports

2013 2020 2030

AEO 2005 AEO 2006 AEO 2007 AEO 2008 AEO 2009 AEO 2010 AEO 2011 AEO 2012 AEO 2013 AEO 2014 AEO 2006 AEO 2007 AEO 2008 AEO 2009 AEO 2010 AEO 2011 AEO 2012 AEO 2013 AEO 2014 AEO 2005 AEO 2007 AEO 2008 AEO 2009 AEO 2010 AEO 2011 AEO 2012 AEO 2013 AEO 2014 AEO 2006

Actual 2013 Volume

21

Projections in successive AEO’s, 2004-2014

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Natural gas and Renewable Natural Gas (RNG)

22 Further Barriers Uncertainty: Credit prices are variable, Carbon Intensities subject to change, long-term contracts unavailable Credit price ceiling may not be high enough to encourage RNG requires support unless carbon intensities change or compliance target falls beyond 2020 goal Fossil natural gas prices are low and projected to remain low into the future

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11 Jan-13 Jan-15 Jan-17 Jan-19 Jan-21 Jan-23 Jan-25 $/mmBTU

Natural Gas Prices

Actual Prices Futures Prices

RNG is expensive to produce

$- $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 $/mmBTU BCF/yr (millions of mmBTUs)

Total RNG Supply by Source

MSW +WWTP +Dairy +Landfill +Fossil

slide-23
SLIDE 23

And much of the limited RNG is already being used

10 bcf/yr

Manure

14.6 bcf/yr 2012 CA vehicular NG consumption 14.7 bcf

Landfill Gas

55 bcf/yr 9.6 bcf/yr

WWTP MSW (food waste)

Technical Potential Existing capacity (all end uses) 2022 projection Based on Williams (2014)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Fuel Cell Vehicles are here, but it’s early days

FCV Market Intro. Dates Announced by Automakers

slide-25
SLIDE 25

DOE: Progress in FC Technologies

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Trucks will need to transition, and their path is very unclear

Two possible scenarios to cut long-haul CO2 by 80% in 2050 (STEPS Freight White Paper, June 2015)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What is available to achieve a two degree scenario?

  • And finally…

– Electric vehicles

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Data from insideevs.con

US Annual PEV Sales slowing in 2015

  • Total LDV vehicles in USA > 250 million
  • USA LDV sales 2015 = 17.5 million
  • Total PEVs registered in USA > 450,000

BEVs PHEVs

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The slowing of the market might suggest a “chasm” between early & more economic minded buyers

Main market consumers Development of market Chasm

Motivated by difference & willing to pay extra Motivated by sameness & want good price

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2025

Early core market: 6-15%

2020

3-5% of market

1st generation policy, “innovators” & infrastructure 200,000 PEVs

2010 2015

1-2%

2nd generation batteries, vehicles, “followers” 500,000 PEVs 3rd generation: batteries, vehicles, “core market” 800,000 PEVS

A plausible California scenario based on laws, incentives & history of previous technology rollouts

4th generation 3 - 4 million???

Curve based on rollout of HEVs in Japan & California 1997-2015

Main market 15-25%

2030

California 2025 ZEV goal = 15% / 1.5 million BEVS, FCV & PHEVs 700 300 200 150 Lithium pack prices per

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS PER THOUSAND PEOPLE BY STATE, 2014 National Renewable Energy Laboratory analysis, R.L. Polk,

Why is California doing well?

  • 1. ZEV laws & success with regulation of clean air 2. High

income car culture 3. “Tech” industry

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

The technology industry in the San Francisco Bay Area creates strong markets for new technology

Tesla land San Jose – about 10% of LDV sales in 2015 were PEVs

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

The longer drives in Los Angeles has encouraged PHEVs, which have been very popular for HOV lanes

More PHEVs in Los Angeles region

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Challenges & opportunities in US PEV market development

  • Slow turnover of fleet - 20 years.
  • Low cost of gasoline; shift to larger vehicles
  • High Cost of ZEV & PEV technologies
  • Rate of product rollout into many vehicle classes
  • Development rate of consumer awareness,

knowledge, experience & product valuation

  • Uneven development of charging infrastructure

(congestion at chargers)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

In US C segment, HEVs and PEVs are at top of price structure (2013)

35

100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 Less than $10.9k $11k-$14.9k $15k-$18.9k $19k to $22.9k $23k to $26.9k $27k to $30.9k $31k to $34.9k $35k to $38.9k $39k to $42.9k $43k to $46.9k $47k to $50.9k $51k to $54.9k $55k to $58.9k $59k to $62.9k $63k to $66.9k $67k to $70.9k $71k + Number of Registered Vehicles Other Hybrid Plug-in

slide-36
SLIDE 36

We’ll need it all to hit this 2oC Transport Scenario

2 4 6 8 10 12 20 40 60 80 100 120 2010 2030 2050 2075 All modes GT CO2 EJ Electricity Hydrogen Biofuel GTL/CTL Kerosene HFO CNG/LPG Diesel Gasoline 2DS Emissions

Fulton et al, 2015, in Biofuels, Biorefining and Bioproducts”