Personalised medicine: a view from drug discovery John Whittaker 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

personalised medicine a view
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Personalised medicine: a view from drug discovery John Whittaker 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Personalised medicine: a view from drug discovery John Whittaker 1 Plan Definition Drug discovery context and implications Enablers Personalised medicine 2 Right patient, right medicine, right time Is this just medicine?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Personalised medicine: a view from drug discovery

John Whittaker

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plan

– Definition – Drug discovery context and implications – Enablers

Personalised medicine 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

– Often equated with diagnostic biomarker eg academy of medical sciences 2013 report, MRC 2016 framework paper – AMS report has 8 examples, all DNA/RNA biomarkers.

– 6 are oncology, 1 HIV (abacavir and HLA B*57:01), one rare disease (CF, kalydeco and G551D CFTR mutation). – Only 2 discovered during development, others foundational parts of therapeutic hypothesis

– Too narrow?

– Eg Asthma sub-populations

– Vaguely: large effect in a selected group – True personalised medicine?

– eg cell therapy

Is this just “medicine”?

Right patient, right medicine, right time

Personalised medicine 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Eroom’s Law

Context

4

Probability of success at target selection 3%

Personalised medicine

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Stratifying during development is hard

Germline only

5

  • Genetic variants affecting safety/efficacy exist
  • We expect 10% of drugs to have ‘detectable’ genetic predictors of

efficacy

  • We do PGx routinely in development

Pros:

  • Trial programs are underpowered for PGx
  • Very unlikely that genetics/genomics will rescue failed trials

Cons

  • EHR/registries + biobanks
  • Polygenic scores?
  • Likely best to stratify disease before medicines: start in the right

place

  • Oncology???

Future

Personalised medicine

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Precise therapeutic

hypothesis

  • Eg, via genetics

Stratify disease

  • Define by genetics,
  • ther biomarker, or

classic phenotypes

  • Doesn’t need to be

that generating hypothesis

Choose test population to maximise POS

  • Eg, go from specific

mutation to a mechanism

  • Eg, lower threshold

Is there a rationale to expand?

How do we derisk?

90% of clinical programs fail

Personalised medicine 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

– Increased causal understanding of etiology

– Genetics – Refined phenotypes

– Ability to recruit stratified populations into trials

– Biobanks with appropriate consent for recontact?

– And prospective biomarker measurement?

– Embedding of trials into healthcare systems? – Platform trials with ability to build in stratification?

– Discoveries during development

– Trials need to collect appropriate data

– Trials that allow expansion of study population?

Enablers

Personalised medicine 7